Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 435 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 665-671

Clinicopathological characteristics and metabolic profiles of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Indian patients with normal body mass index: Do they differ from obese or overweight non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?


1 Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pathology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jun-2013

Correspondence Address:
Ramesh Kumar
Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Sector D1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110 070
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.113758

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Obesity is an important risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); however, NAFLD does occur in lean subjects. This study was aimed to evaluate the magnitude, clinical, pathological, and metabolic profiles of NAFLD in normal body mass index (BMI) subjects (defined as lean NAFLD) in comparison to overweight or obese NAFLD and lean healthy control. Materials and Methods: 336 subjects (205 consecutive NAFLD, and 131 healthy controls) were studied. Results: Among 205 NAFLD patients, 27 (13.2%) were lean, while 141 (68.8%) and 37 (18%) patients were obese and overweight, respectively. The lean NAFLD compared to obese NAFLD had significantly lesser degree of fasting hyperinsulinemia ( P < 0.001), homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR, P < 0.001), and lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.01) and metabolic syndrome ( P < 0.001). The profiles of serum lipids were similar between all 3 BMI categories, and 89% of lean NAFLD were dyslipidemic. Compared to obese subjects, patients with lean NAFLD had less hepatic necro-inflammation ( P = 0.05) and fibrosis ( P < 0.001). However, the proportion of steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis were similar between all BMI categories. The profiles of overweight NAFLD were similar to those of lean NAFLD, except for higher HOMA-IR, uric acids and male gender in overweight group. Despite being lean, the mean BMI of lean NAFLD were still higher than unselected lean healthy controls ( P = 0.02). Conclusions: Lean NAFLD patients have less severe disease, minor, or no insulin resistance, but are frequently dyslipidemic and have BMI higher than lean healthy control.

Keywords: Dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease


How to cite this article:
Kumar R, Rastogi A, Sharma MK, Bhatia V, Garg H, Bihari C, Sarin SK. Clinicopathological characteristics and metabolic profiles of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Indian patients with normal body mass index: Do they differ from obese or overweight non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?. Indian J Endocr Metab 2013;17:665-71

How to cite this URL:
Kumar R, Rastogi A, Sharma MK, Bhatia V, Garg H, Bihari C, Sarin SK. Clinicopathological characteristics and metabolic profiles of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Indian patients with normal body mass index: Do they differ from obese or overweight non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Jan 22];17:665-71. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2013/17/4/665/113758


   Introduction Top


Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. [1],[2] The prevalence of NAFLD in Indian population ranges from 5 to 28%, which is comparable to the West. [3] The spectrum of NAFLD ranges from simple steatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), to cirrhosis. Although NAFLD is more common in subjects with obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM), it does occur in lean and non-diabetic subject. [2],[4],[5] Furthermore, compared to the West, Indians are known to develop NAFLD at lower degree of adiposity. [2],[6],[7] In a recent population-based epidemiological study in India, 75% of individuals with NAFLD were non-obese and 54% were neither overweight nor had central obesity. [2] Another recent study revealed that lean, non-alcoholic, non-diabetic, non-smoking ethnic Asian Indians in comparison to matched Caucasians, Hispanics, Black and Eastern Asians had 2- to 3-fold increase in insulin resistance (IR) and 2-fold increase in hepatic triglyceride content. [7] Recent concepts also suggest that the magnitude of adipose tissue dysfunction may have more metabolic impact than the severity of adiposity. [8]

Obesity is not only a risk factor for NAFLD but also determine severity of NAFLD. [9],[10] The recommended body mass index (BMI) cutoff values for Asians for defining overweight (23-25 kg/m 2 ) and obesity (>25 kg/m 2 ) are lesser than those of Western populations. [11] Also, the Asians are known to develop central obesity at lower BMI. Also, lower preponderance of adiposity in Indian NAFLD is well-documented, [2],[6],[7] ; however, data on clinical characteristics, metabolic profiles, and histopathological severity in patients with lean NAFLD in comparison to the overweight or obese NAFLD patients is scant. It is not clear what proportion of lean NAFLD in India has abdominal obesity, IR, and features of metabolic syndrome (MS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and clinical profiles, metabolic profiles, and histopathological severity of patients with lean NAFLD in comparison to overweight or obese NAFLD, and lean healthy control without fatty liver.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was conducted between 2009 December to 2011 November. During study period, 205 consecutive patients with NAFLD were included in this study. The diagnosis of NAFLD was made on the basis of characteristics real time ultrasonography features, presence of IR or features of MS, and histologic confirmation whenever possible. NAFLD with BMI of less than 23 kg/m 2 were defined as lean NAFLD. Patients using alcohol >20 g ⁄ day, patients with liver diseases of other known causes, patients on certain medications known to induce fatty liver such as estrogens, amiodarone, methotrexate, and tamoxifen were excluded. For comparing characteristics of lean NAFLD patients, we also included 131 lean healthy subjects with normal liver on ultrasonography as control subjects. The consent for including data for the purpose of study was obtained from each patient at the time of enrollment.

Definitions

Patients with BMI of more than 23 kg/m 2 were defined as overweight and those with a BMI of >25 were labeled as obese according to Asian standards. [11] Patients having at least 3 of the following 5 components: Hyperglycemia (fasting Blood sugar >110 mg%), central obesity (waist circumference >90 cm for males and >80 cm for females), hypertension (BP >130/85), hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride >150 mg %), and low HDL cholesterol levels (<50mg/dl for women and < 40mg/dl for men) were labeled to have the metabolic syndrome as per modified Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. [12] Dyslipidemia was defined by presence of one or more than one abnormal serum lipid concentration.

Patients evaluation and procedure

A thorough clinical history and examinations including anthropometric measurements were done in all patients at the initial visit. After an overnight fast, blood sample were collected for a complete blood count and biochemical investigations including a liver function test, lipid profile, fasting serum insulin, and fasting blood glucose. Serum sample from each patient was tested for markers of viral hepatitis A, B, C, and E. Serum ferritin, copper study, thyroid function tests, and autoantibody tests were done using conventional techniques. IR was measured as homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Value of HOMA-IR more than 2.0 was taken as the presence of insulin resistance. [13]

Liver biopsy

Liver biopsy was performed a day after performance of blood tests. The biopsy was performed using an 18-gauge biopsy gun, after obtaining informed consent and knowing that the coagulation profile was normal. Liver biopsy specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. All biopsy specimens were analyzed by two experienced hepatopathologists (A.R. and C.B.) blinded to clinical data. The classification given by Kleiner et al. was used to grade and stage NAFLD. [14] Grade of steatosis was defined: 0 = steatosis <5%, 1 = steatosis 5% to 33%, 2 = steatosis >33%-66%, 3 = steatosis >66%. Fibrosis was staged from 0 to 4: Stage 0 = absence of fibrosis; stage 1 = perisinusoidal or portal; stage 2 = perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; stage 3 = septal or bridging fibrosis; and stage 4 = cirrhosis. NAFLD activity score was calculated in each patient as sum of the scores for steatosis (0-3), lobular inflammation (0-3), and ballooning (0-2); which ranged from 0 to 8. Patients with activity score 5 or more were labeled having NASH. The biopsy sample was assessed independently by both pathologists. The consensus between them was good. In case of discrepancies, histological sections were simultaneously reviewed to reach a consensus.

Non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis and FibroScan

The aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) was calculated as AST (/upper limit of normal)/platelet count (×10 9 /L) × 100. [15] FIB-4 was calculated as age × AST U/L)/platelet count (×10 9 /L) × √ALT (U/L). [16] The NAFLD fibrosis score was calculated according to the following formula: −1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m 2 ) + 1.13 × impaired fasting glycemia/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio-0.013 × platelet (×10 9 /L) − 0.66 × albumin (g/dL). [17] Transient elastography (TE) was performed using FibroScan (Echosens, France). As suggested by the manufacturer, 10 successful acquisitions were performed on each patient. The results were expressed in kilopascal (kPa). Median value of the successful measurements was kept as representative of liver stiffness. Only TE-results obtained with 10 valid measurements with a success-rate of at least 60% and an interquartile range ≤ 30% were considered reliable.

Data analysis

Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD), and the continuous variables with skewed distribution were expressed as median (range). Categorical data was presented as proportions. For the comparison of normal covariates between BMI categories, one way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as a post-hoc test was used. Similarly, the comparisons between these groups for skewed data were performed by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann Whitney test with adjusted P values. Comparisons for categorical variables were done using x2 or Fishers test for discrete variables, wherever applicable. Data were analyzed by using SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), and a P < 0.05 was taken as significant.


   Results Top


Demographic and metabolic characteristics

Among 205 NAFLD patients, obesity was present in 141 (68.8%) patients, 37 (18%) patients were overweight, and 27 (13.2%) patients were lean (BMI < 23 Kg/m 2 ). The baseline demographic and metabolic profiles of all NAFLD patients in all 3 BMI categories are summarized in [Table 1]. Majorities (70% to 95%) of the patients were male, and the mean ages at presentation were similar in all 3 BMI groups. Compared to obese NAFLD, patients with lean NAFLD had lower degree of fasting hyperinsulinemia (6.7 2.3-11.6 vs. 11.9 3.9-81.6, P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (1.7 [0.5-2.7] vs. 2.72 [0.9-20.1], P < 0.001). The IR as indicated by HOMA-IR > 2 was present in only 7.4% ( n = 02) patients of lean NAFLD, which was significantly lower than that in overweight (40%, P = 0.05), or obese NAFLD (61%, P = 0.001). Interestingly, 89% ( n = 24) of lean NAFLD patients were dyslipidemic, and compared to overweight or obese, lean NAFLD patients had the similar serum levels of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. The mean waist circumference of lean NAFL patients was 80.1 ± 5.8, and as per definition, only 2 (7.4%) patient satisfied the criteria for abdominal obesity. The metabolic syndrome tended to be less common in lean NAFLD patients compared to obese NAFLD (22% vs. 64%, P < 0.001), but was similar to those with overweight NAFD (22% vs. 27%, P = 0.77). However, at least one criterion of metabolic syndrome was seen in majority (89%, 24/27) of lean NAFLD patients. The profiles of lean and overweight NAFLD were similar in terms of the metabolic variables such lipid profiles, levels of fasting blood glucose, and insulin.
Table 1: The baseline demographic and metabolic profi les of NAFLD patients in all 3 BMI categories

Click here to view


Disease severity in lean NAFLD compared to obese and overweight

Laboratory parameters

The median levels of serum transaminases, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase were similar between all 3 BMI categories [Table 2]. The lean compared to obese or overweight NAFLD patients had lower levels of serum uric acid.
Table 2: The biochemical parameters and disease severity (histopathology and non-invasive markers of NAFLD patients in all 3 BMI categories)

Click here to view


Histopathology

Liver biopsy was available in 110 NAFLD patients (18 lean, 19 overweight, and 73 obese patients). The mean NAFLD activity score (NAS) in lean patients (3.3 ± 1.5) was significantly lower in comparison to mean NAS (4.1 ± 1.4) in obese NAFLD patients ( P = 0.01). However, 28% (5 of 18) lean NAFLD patients met criteria for NASH (NAS > 4), which was statistically similar to the prevalence of NASH in overweight (47%) and obese (38%) patients with NAFLD. The proportion of patients with liver fibrosis was significantly lower in lean compared to obese NAFLD (50% vs. 84%, P = 0.01), and advanced fibrosis tended to be lower in lean than in obese NAFLD, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (5.6% vs. 27%, P = 0.06).

Non-invasive markers

Because liver biopsy could not be done in all patients, various non-invasive parameters (AST/AST ratio, APRI, FIB-4, and NAFLD fibrosis score) were also used to assess severity of NAFLD in all patients. However, none of parameters were significantly different between patients of 3 BMI categories [Table 2]. Liver stiffness values by measured FibroScan were also similar between lean, overweight, and obese NAFLD patients.

Lean NAFLD versus lean healthy subjects

The characteristics of lean patients with NAFLD were compared to 131 non-selected lean healthy control subjects without ultrasonographic evidence of fatty liver [Table 3]. Despite being in normal range, the mean BMI of lean NAFLD were still higher than of lean healthy controls (21.3 ± 0.9 vs. 22.0 ± 0.76 kg/m 2 , P = 0.02). Also, the prevalence of dyslipidemia and MS were significantly higher in lean NAFLD than the lean healthy controls.
Table 3: Characteristics of lean NAFLD patients with non-selected lean healthy control subjects

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The lean NAFLD comprised approximately 13.2% ( n = 27) of total NAFLD ( n = 205) patients coming to our tertiary liver care center. In various study from India, the proportion of lean NAFLD has been reported to vary from 11% to 31.7% [Table 4]. The most important metabolic risk factor among lean NAFLD patients was dyslipidemia, which was present in nearly 90% of them. The IR as indicated by HOMA-IR > 2 was present in only 7.4% ( n = 2) patients of lean NAFLD, which was significantly lower than that in overweight ( P = 0.05), or obese NAFLD ( P = 0.001). Only 2 (7.4%) of lean NAFLD patients had abdominal obesity. However, the mean BMI, hypertension, serum lipids, fasting blood sugar, and MS among lean NAFLD patients were significantly higher than those in lean healthy control.
Table 4: Body mass indices of NAFLD patients in Indian studies

Click here to view


Compared to obese NAFLD, the severity of liver histopathology was significantly lower in patients with lean NAFLD in terms of mean NAS ( P = 0.01) and liver fibrosis ( P = 0.01). Although not statistically significant [Table 2], the proportion of patients with NASH and advanced fibrosis tended to be lower in lean NAFLD compared to obese NAFLD. This may be because of smaller number of patients in lean NAFLD. However, the effect size of difference in disease severity may not be large because histopathology were not available in all patients, and severity based on non-invasive parameters were similar different between patients of 3 BMI categories. The serum level of uric acid, one of the markers of NAFLD severity, [18] was significantly lower among lean NAFLD compared to obese NAFLD. The levels of serum transaminases were similar between all 3 BMI categories. However, transaminases are the poor marker of severity in NAFLD patients. [19]

Although obesity is an important risk factor, NAFLD has been reported in non-obese subjects from developing as well as developed countries. [2],[4],[5] Furthermore, NAFLD in India had been reported to develop at lower BMI. [2],[6],[7] In a population-based study from rural India, 52% of individuals with NAFLD were lean (BMI < 23). [2] However, majority (87%) of screened population in this study were lean, and only 7% were obese. The lower preponderance of lean NAFLD (13.2%) in our hospital-based cohort suggests that many of lean NAFLD patients do not seek medical advice. Interestingly, Das et al. [2] also found that individuals with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 Kg/m 2 ) had two-fold increases in risk for NAFLD than those with a BMI < 18.5 Kg/m 2 . In our study also, the mean BMI of lean NAFLD patients were higher than 131 non-selected healthy lean subjects without fatty liver (21.3 ± 0.9 vs. 22.0 ± 0.76 kg/m 2 ), P = 0.02). Also, the prevalence of dyslipidemia and MS were significantly higher in lean NAFLD than the controls. Thus, although obesity is clearly a risk factor for NAFLD, this appears to be modified strongly by ethnicity, genetic predisposition, or environmental factors, which may explain risk of NAFLD in lean subjects. The substantial variability of hepatic fat content varies among individuals with equivalent adiposity supports this view. A study revealed that lean, non-alcoholic, non-diabetic, non-smoking Asian Indians in comparison to similar age, sex, BMI-matched Caucasians, Hispanics, Black and Eastern Asians had 2- to 3-fold increase in IR and 2-fold increase in hepatic steatosis. [8]

Asians are known to have abdominal (visceral) obesity at lower BMI. However, in our study, abdominal obesity measured as waist circumference was not increased in patients with lean NAFLD. This may be explained by the fact that central obesity, which also includes subcutaneous abdominal fat which is relatively inert metabolically, doesn't exactly correspond to visceral adiposity. Another study has also found a poor association of abdominal adiposity with NAFLD in Asian Indian. [20] It is possible that patients with lean NAFLD can have subtle measures of increased adiposity. A study has revealed that lean NAFLD patients have higher subcutaneous skin-fold thicknesses and higher body fat percentage on bioelectric impedance analysis compared to control subjects. [2] Else, the adipose tissues of lean NAFLD may be metabolically more active. There is a growing concept that the quality rather than quantity of adipose tissue may be more important in conferring metabolic risks leading to NAFLD. [8] Under normal condition, adipose tissues are the primary source (70%) of free fatty acids for hepatic triglyceride. Thus, adipose tissue IR may trigger excess release of fatty acids leading to development of hepatic "lipotoxicity" in NAFLD. A study has reported that patients with NASH have severe adipose tissue IR independent of the degree of obesity, and amelioration of adipose tissue IR by pioglitazone is closely related to histological improvement. [21] The lean NSH may have accelerated lypolysis due to IR, mainly at adipose tissues. Notably, majority of lean NAFLD patients in our cohort had dyslipidemia.

In general, IR is believed to be an important trigger for initiation of NAFLD. NAFLD has been shown to be associated with IR independently of BMI, [22] and studies have reported that IR is frequently present in lean NAFLD patients, even without other metabolic disorders. [23],[24] However, IR as indicated by HOMA-IR > 2 was present in only 7.4% ( n = 2) patients of lean NAFLD, and such patients had lower degree of fasting hyperinsulinemia ( P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR ( P < 0.001) compared to obese NAFLD. Thus, lean NAFLD patients have minor or no hepatic insulin resistance. A recent study on effect of vitamin E in patients with NAFLD has shown a significant improvement in liver histology without any change in the degree of IR. [25] Furthermore, various genetic factors are known to confer susceptibility to NAFLD in individuals without increasing the level of IR. Patients with mutations in either adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) or comparative gene identification-58 (CGI58) have severe steatosis but no IR. [26] Individuals with inactivating mutations in apolipoprotein B (APO B) gene have increased levels of hepatic triglyceride yet no IR. [27] A genetic variant in patatin-like phospholipase 3 gene (PNPLA3) that is associated with hepatic steatosis is not associated with IR. [28] Also, it must be noted that we estimated IR by HOMA, which is an indirect method and has limitation that it reflects only hepatic insulin sensitivity. In lean NAFLD, peripheral (adipose tissues and skeletal muscles) IR may be more important than hepatic IR. [21] Regarding environmental factors, an increased intake of dietary fat has been suggested to lead to increased accumulation of lipids in the liver of lean subjects. [29] A higher intake of soft drinks and meat is associated with an increased risk of NAFLD, independently of age, gender, BMI, and total calories. [30],[35]


   Conclusion Top


The lean subjects with NAFLD are frequently dyslipidemic. Compared to obese or overweight NAFLD, patients with lean NAFLD have minor or no insulin resistance, and appear to have less severe histological disease at presentation. They do not have abdominal obesity, but their BMI was higher than lean healthy control.

 
   References Top

1.McCullough AJ. Pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenteol 2006;40(Suppl 1):S17-29.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Das K, Das K, Mukherjee PS, Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Mridha AR, et al. Nonobese population in a developing country has a high prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and significant liver disease. Hepatol 2010;51:1593-602.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.AmarapurkarDN, Hashimoto E, Lesmana LA, Sollano JD, Chen PJ, Goh KL. Asia-Pacific Working Party on NAFLD. How common is non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region and are there local differences? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22:788-793.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Bellentani S, Saccoccio G, Masutti F, Crocè LS, Brandi G, Sasso F, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatic steatosis in Northern Italy. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:112-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Madan K, Batra Y, Gupta SD, Chander B, Rajan KD, Tewari MS, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may not be a severe disease at presentation among Asian Indians. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:3400-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Duseje A, Das A, Das R, Dhiman RK, Chawla A, Bhansali A, et al. The clinicopathological profile of Indian patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is Different from that in the west. Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:2368-74.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Petersen KF, Dufour S, Feng J, Befroy D, Dziura J, Man CD, et al. Increased prevalence of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Asian-Indian men. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2006;103:18273-27.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Succurro E, Marini MA, Frontoni S, Hribal ML, Andreozzi F, Lauro R, et al. Insulin secretion in metabolically obese, but normal weight, and in metabolically healthy but obese individuals. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:1881-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Fabbrini E, Sullivan S, Klein S. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Biochemical, metabolic, and clinical implications. Hepatol 2010;51:679-89.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Parekh S, Anania FA. Abnormal lipid and glucose metabolism in obesity: Implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol 2007;132:2191-207.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Heng D, Ma S, Lee JJM, Tai BC, Mak KH, Hughes K, et al. Modification of the NCEP ATP III definitions of the metabolic syndrome for use in Asians identifies individuals at risk of ischemic heart disease. Atherosclerosis 2006;186:367-73.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, Bonadonna RC, Saggiani F, Zenere MB, et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: Studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 2000;23:57- 63.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol 2005;41:1313-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol 2003;38:518-26.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatol 2006;43:1317-25.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: A noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatol 2007;45:846-54.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Petta S, Cammà C, Cabibi D, Di Marco V, Craxì A. Hyperuricemia is associated with histological liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:757-66.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, Sargeant C, Fisher RA, Luketic VA, et al. Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatol 2003;37:1286-92.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Bajaj S, Nigam P, Luthra A, Pandey RM, Kondal D, Bhatt SP, et al. A case-control study on insulin resistance, metabolic co-variates and prediction score in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Indian J Med Res 2009;129:285-92.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
21.Gastaldelli A, Harrison SA, Belfort-Aguilar R, Hardies LJ, Balas B, Schenker S, et al. Importance of changes in adipose tissue insulin resistance to histological response during thiazolidinedione treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol 2009;50:1087-93.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Bugianesi E, Lenzi M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes 2001;50:1844-50.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Bugianesi E, Gastaldelli A, Vanni E, Gambino R, Cassader M, Baldi S, et al. Insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Sites and mechanisms. Diabetologia 2005;48:634-42.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Lee KE, Kim DJ, Kim SK, Ahn CW, et al. Metabolic significance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese, nondiabetic adults. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2169-75.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, Kowdley KV, McCullough A, Diehl AM, Bass NM, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. New England J of Med 2010;362:1675-85.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Hooper AJ, Adams LA, Burnett JR. Genetic determinants of hepatic steatosis in man. J Lipid Res 2011;52:593-617.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Tanoli T, Yue P, Yablonskiy D, Schonfeld G. Fatty liver in familial hypobetalipoproteinemia: Roles of the APOB defects, intra-abdominal adipose tissue, and insulin sensitivity. J Lipid Res 2004;45:941-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Santoro N, Kursawe R, D'Adamo E, Dykas DJ, Zhang CK, Bale AE, et al. A common variant in the patatin-like phospholipase 3 gene (PNPLA3) is associated with fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents. Hepatol 2010;52:1281-90.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Tilg H, Moschen AR. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatol 2010;52:1836-46.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Zelber-Sagi S, Nitzan-Kaluski D, Goldsmith R, Webb M, Blendis L, Halpern Z, et al. Long term nutritional intake and the risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A population based study. J Hepatol 2007;47:711-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Amarapurkar D, Kamani P, Patel N, Gupte P, Kumar P, Agal S, et al. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Population based study. Ann Hepatol 2007;6:161-3.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Agarwal AK, Jain V, Singla S, Baruah BP, Arya V, Yadav R, et al. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its correlation with coronary risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Assoc Physicians India 2011;59:351-4.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Uchil D, Pipalia D, Chawla M, Patel R, Maniar S, Narayani, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): The hepatic component of metabolic syndrome. J Assoc Physicians India 2009;57:201-4.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Subir Kumar Das SK, Balakrishnan V. Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ind J Clin Biochem 2011;26:202-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Viswanathan V, Kadiri M, Medipudi S, Kumpatla S. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with microvascular and macrovascular complications in south Indian diabetic subjects. Int J Diabetes Dev C 2010;30:208-12.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 The relationship between obesity and the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
Feng-Bin Lu,En-De Hu,Lan-Man Xu,Lu Chen,Jin-Lu Wu,Hui Li,Da-Zhi Chen,Yong-Ping Chen
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018; 12(5): 491
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Hepatoprotective effect of bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid tiliamosine from Tiliacora racemosa in high-fat diet/diethylnitrosamine-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
S. Sylvester Darvin,Erenius Toppo,S. Esakkimuthu,T.P. Ajeesh Krishna,S. Antony Ceasar,A. Stalin,K. Balakrishna,N. Muniappan,N. Pazhanivel,R. Mahaprabhu,M. Gabriel Paulraj,P. Pandikumar,S. Ignacimuthu,N.A. Al-Dhabi
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018; 108: 963
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 The Association of leptin with severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A population-based study
Laura Rotundo,Alana Persaud,Mirela Feurdean,Sushil Ahlawat,Hyun-seok Kim
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Alice Yuxin Wang,Jasbir Dhaliwal,Marialena Mouzaki
Clinical Nutrition. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Impact of family history of metabolic traits on severity of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis related cirrhosis: A cross-sectional study
Ajeet S. Bhadoria,Chandan K. Kedarisetty,Chhagan Bihari,Guresh Kumar,Ankur Jindal,Ankit Bhardwaj,Varsha Shasthry,Tanmay Vyas,Jaya Benjamin,Shvetank Sharma,Manoj K. Sharma,Shiv K. Sarin
Liver International. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Systematic review with meta-analysis: risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease suggest a shared altered metabolic and cardiovascular profile between lean and obese patients
S. Sookoian,C. J. Pirola
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a sign of systemic disease
Isabella Reccia,Jayant Kumar,Cherif Akladios,Francesco Virdis,Madhava Pai,Nagy Habib,Duncan Spalding
Metabolism. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Treatment Strategies for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Pegah Golabi,Haley Bush,Zobair M. Younossi
Clinics in Liver Disease. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Nonobese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Elizabeth Aby,Sammy Saab
Clinical Liver Disease. 2017; 10(5): 130
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention
Zobair Younossi,Quentin M. Anstee,Milena Marietti,Timothy Hardy,Linda Henry,Mohammed Eslam,Jacob George,Elisabetta Bugianesi
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Lean Subjects: Characteristics and Implications
Ramesh Kumar,Shantam Mohan
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology. 2017; XX(XX): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Non-obese Patients
Christopher J. Schmoyer,Mohammad S. Siddiqui
Current Hepatology Reports. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Systematic review with meta-analysis: the significance of histological disease severity in lean patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
S. Sookoian,C. J. Pirola
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - histological scoring systems: a large cohort single-center, evaluation study
Archana Rastogi,Saggere Muralikrishna Shasthry,Ayushi Agarwal,Chhagan Bihari,Priyanka Jain,Ankur Jindal,Shiv Sarin
APMIS. 2017; 125(11): 962
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Adipokines, cytokines and body fat stores in hepatitis C virus liver steatosis
Emilio González-Reimers
World Journal of Hepatology. 2016; 8(1): 74
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Histological severity and clinical outcomes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese patients
Jonathan Chung-Fai Leung,Thomson Chi-Wang Loong,Jeremy Lok Wei,Grace Lai-Hung Wong,Anthony Wing-Hung Chan,Paul Cheung-Lung Choi,Sally She-Ting Shu,Angel Mei-Ling Chim,Henry Lik-Yuen Chan,Vincent Wai-Sun Wong
Hepatology. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Normal weight dyslipidemia: Is it all about the liver?
David Hřjland Ipsen,Pernille Tveden-Nyborg,Jens Lykkesfeldt
Obesity. 2016; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Extracellular Vesicles: A New Frontier in Biomarker Discovery for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Linda Ban,Nicholas Shackel,Susan McLennan
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(3): 376
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in nonobese patients: Not so different after all
Kenneth Cusi
Hepatology. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 UEG Week 2016 Poster Presentations
United European Gastroenterology Journal. 2016; 4(5_suppl): A157
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Increased visceral adiposity with normal weight is associated with the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes
Ryotaro Bouchi,Takato Takeuchi,Momoko Akihisa,Norihiko Ohara,Yujiro Nakano,Rie Nishitani,Masanori Murakami,Tatsuya Fukuda,Masamichi Fujita,Isao Minami,Masatomo Mihara,Takanobu Yoshimoto,Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal of Diabetes Investigation. 2016; 7(4): 607
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Barley Sprouts Extract Attenuates Alcoholic Fatty Liver Injury in Mice by Reducing Inflammatory Response
Yun-Hee Lee,Joung-Hee Kim,Sou Kim,Ji Oh,Woo Seo,Kyung-Mi Kim,Jae-Chul Jung,Young-Suk Jung
Nutrients. 2016; 8(7): 440
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Hyperreactivity of Blood Leukocytes in Patients with NAFLD to Ex Vivo Lipopolysaccharide Treatment Is Modulated by Metformin and Phosphatidylcholine but Not by Alpha Ketoglutarate
Agnieszka Zwolak,Agnieszka Szuster-Ciesielska,Jadwiga Daniluk,Olga Slabczynska,Martyna Kandefer-Szerszen,Patricia Aspichueta
PLOS ONE. 2015; 10(12): e0143851
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Prevalence of Insulin Resistance in Subjects with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Its Predictors in a Chinese Population
Minrui Li,Shenghong Zhang,Yanqin Wu,Junzhao Ye,Xu Cao,Jie Liu,Yanhong Sun,Bihui Zhong
Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 The riddle of Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Progression from NAFL to NASH
Mithun Sharma,Shasikala Mitnala,Ravi Kanth Vishnubhotla,Rathin Mukherjee,D.N. Reddy,P.N. Rao
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Pooled genetic analysis in ultrasound measured non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Indian subjects: A pilot study
Vishnubhotla Venkata Ravi Kanth
World Journal of Hepatology. 2014; 6(6): 435
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Clinical, anthropometric, biochemical, and histological characteristics of nonobese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients of Bangladesh
Shahinul Alam,Utpal Das Gupta,Mahbubul Alam,Jahangir Kabir,Ziaur Rahman Chowdhury,A. K. M. Khorshed Alam
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Association of anti-Mullerian hormone and small-dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with hepatosteatosis in young lean women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome
Efser Oztas,Gamze S. Caglar,Cemil Kaya,Demet Karadag,Selda Demirtas,Mevlut Kurt,Recai Pabuccu
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2014; 182: 240
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4274    
    Printed37    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded1039    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 28    

Recommend this journal