Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 270 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 502-504

LDL-cholesterol: Friedewald calculated versus direct measurement-study from a large Indian laboratory database


1 Consultant, Endocrinology Diabetes and Bariatric Medicine, Narayana Health City, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
2 Endocrine and Speciality Clinic, Chennai, India
3 Assistant Professor Endocrinology, Chettinad Medical College, Chennai, India
4 Consultant Endocrinologist, Arka Center for Hormonal Health, Chennai, India
5 Department of Clinical Endocrinology, Alpha Hospital and Research Centre, Anuppanady, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Shriraam Mahadevan
Endocrine and Speciality Clinic, 4th Cross Street, R K Nagar, Mandaveli, Chennai 600 028, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.137496

Rights and Permissions

Background: Validity of Friedewald formula (FF) in patients with serum triglycerides (TGs) <400 mg/dl is unclear. Materials and Methods: We compared low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol calculated by FF to directly measured LDL in a laboratory database of 14,620 lipid profile samples from south India. Results: LDL by FF correlated with directly measured LDL with correlation coefficient of 0.89 with the best correlation seen in TG levels 100-150. Higher level of TG (>200) underestimates the LDL calculated by FF particularly at LDL values <70 mg/dl. On the other hand, LDL is overestimated by FF in more than 70% of cases at LDL levels >130 mg/dl. Conclusion: We suggest repeating the LDL by direct assay techniques particularly in patients with TG >200 and when LDL <70 or >130. This helps in correctly stratifying the coronary artery diseases' (CADs') risk and goals of treatment.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2383    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded439    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 12    

Recommend this journal