|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 22-31
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with insulin in type 2 diabetes: Clinical perspectives
Mathew John, Deepa Gopinath, Rejitha Jagesh
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Providence Endocrine and Diabetes Specialty Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
|Date of Web Publication||21-Dec-2015|
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Providence Endocrine and Diabetes Specialty Centre, TC 1/2138, Murinjapalam, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 011, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The treatment of type 2 diabetes is a challenging problem. Most subjects with type 2 diabetes have progression of beta cell failure necessitating the addition of multiple antidiabetic agents and eventually use of insulin. Intensification of insulin leads to weight gain and increased risk of hypoglycemia. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of antihyperglycemic agents which act by blocking the SGLT2 in the proximal tubule of the kidney. They have potential benefits in terms of weight loss and reduction of blood pressure in addition to improvements in glycemic control. Further, one of the SGLT2 inhibitors, empagliflozin has proven benefits in reducing adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a CV outcome trial. Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to insulin in subjects with type 2 diabetes produced favorable effects on glycemic control without the weight gain and hypoglycemic risks associated with insulin therapy. The general risks of increased genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, volume, and osmosis-related adverse effects in these subjects were similar to the pooled data of individual SGLT2 inhibitors. There are subsets of subjects with type 2 diabetes who may have insulin deficiency, beta cell autoimmunity, or is prone to diabetic ketoacidosis. In these subjects, SGLT2 inhibitors should be used with caution to prevent the rare risks of ketoacidosis.
Keywords: Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, sodium glucose cotransporter 2, type 2 diabetes
|How to cite this article:|
John M, Gopinath D, Jagesh R. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with insulin in type 2 diabetes: Clinical perspectives. Indian J Endocr Metab 2016;20:22-31
|How to cite this URL:|
John M, Gopinath D, Jagesh R. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with insulin in type 2 diabetes: Clinical perspectives. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 23];20:22-31. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2016/20/1/22/172268
| Introduction|| |
Diabetes and its associated complications account for significant healthcare costs in both developing and developed countries.,, The control of hyperglycemia forms the cornerstone in managing diabetes. UnitedKingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) has shown that improving blood sugars in subjects with type 2 diabetes early in the course of disease can result in a reduction in onset of retinopathy, microalbuminuria, and neuropathy. Follow-up of the subjects in UKPDS after 10 years have shown a distinct improvement in outcomes such as mortality, microvascular disease, and macrovascular disease in subjects who were intensively controlled. Various classes of oral antidiabetic agents, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists form the armamentarium against hyperglycemia. Despite the availability of these agents, the overall control of hyperglycemia remains suboptimal in both developed and developing countries.,
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors form a new class of agents that act on the kidney by competitively blocking the SGLT2 channels. These agents are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used as monotherapy or in combination with metformin, sulfonylurea (SU), pioglitazone, or insulin. The American Diabetes Association practice guidelines have added SGLT2 inhibitors as the first add-on to metformin alongside other drugs such as SU, dipeptyl peptidase 4(DPP4) inhibitors, thiazolidinedione, and basal insulin. SGLT2 inhibitors also find a place as a second add-on drug after two of the other drugs are used. As more drugs are added, the complexity of diabetes regimes also increases.
Most patients with type 2 diabetes have progressive worsening of beta cell function that necessitates the addition of insulin as the duration of disease increases. The UKPDS reported that over a 6-year period, ∼53% of patients who were randomized to receive sulfonylureas needed additional insulin therapy. Once insulin is introduced, there are limited recommendations on how the oral diabetes agents be used. Studies have shown that insulin in combination with oral antidiabetic medications such as SU, metformin, and pioglitazone leads to reduced insulin dosage. Metformin may counteract the increased weight gain associated with insulin when used in combination. It is recommended that the SU be discontinued when the basal insulin doses increase and when prandial insulin is started. SUs can cause weight gain and increase the risk of hypoglycemia when used in association with insulin., The combination of thiazolidinedione with insulin is associated with weight gain, edema, and increased risk of congestive heart failure., Incretin-based therapies, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and DPP4 inhibitors can be combined with insulin with favorable effects on glycemic control, weight loss, and insulin dose. SGLT2 blockers have favorable properties, which make it a near-ideal agent for using with insulin: oral administration, substantial hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) lowering, weight loss, and reduction in systolic blood pressure. Since EMPA-REG OUTCOME, the cardiovascular (CV) outcome trial of empagliflozin proved superiority over standard treatment in subjects with high CV risk, the use of this class of drugs in high CV risk subjects will be an area of interest. This review focus of the use of insulin along with SGLT2 inhibitors in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
| Search Strategy|| |
A PubMed search was conducted using the search terms SGLT2 blockers[title], canagliflozin[title], dapagliflozin[title], empagliflozin[title] to identify the published studies on SGLT2 blockers in type 2 diabetes. In addition, these references were supplemented by publications identified from the similar search option in PubMed, bibliographies of selected articles from the PubMed search including review articles and known references. These articles were scrutinized and the publications considered relevant to the topic were included in the review. Abstracts presented in conferences were searched from Google Scholar. None of these were included in the review as the data were seemed to be overlapping with published studies. Studies <3 months duration and those in languages other than English were not used in the review.
| Sodium Glucose Cotransporters|| |
SGLT2 is a high-capacity and low-affinity glucose transporter that is expressed in the luminal membranes of the proximal renal tubules and is responsible for 90% of glucose reabsorption from S1 and S2 segment of the proximal convoluted tubule. The rest 10% of the glucose absorption happens in the S3 segment of proximal convoluted tubule and is taken care of by SGLT1., In renal cells isolated from subjects with type 2 diabetes, there is an enhanced expression of SGLT2 and GLUT2. Blocking SGLT2 would reduce the renal threshold for glucose (RTG) in the kidney thereby causing osmotic diuresis. However, despite SGLT2 transporters being responsible for 90% of glucose reabsorption, SGLT2 inhibitors inhibit only 30–50% of the glucose absorption in diabetic subjects. This is a result of residual SGLT2 activity and SGLT1 compensation., SGLT2 inhibitors, by the inherent nature of the target of action, are independent of insulin secretion and insulin resistance. This would make them theoretically attractive to be used at any stage of diabetes.
| Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors|| |
The FDA has approved 3 SGLT2 inhibitors for use in adults with type 2 diabetes: Canagliflozin (Invokana, Janssen), dapagliflozin (Farxiga, AstraZeneca), and empagliflozin (Jardiance, Boehringer Ingelheim). Approved fixed-dose combination products include canagliflozin/metformin (Invokamet, Janssen), extended-release dapagliflozin/metformin (Xigduo XR, AstraZeneca), and empagliflozin/linagliptin (Glyxambi, Boehringer Ingelheim) and empagliflozin/metformin (Synjardy, Boehringer Ingelheim). Ipragliflozin, luseogliflozin, and tofogliflozin has been approved in Japan for subjects with type 2 diabetes.
SGLT2 inhibitors have various advantages as oral antidiabetic agents: effective glucose lowering, low risk of hypoglycaemia as monotherapy and when used with Pioglitazone, DPP-4 inhibitors or Metformin, reduction in visceral fat, long durability of action, weight loss, and reduction of systolic blood pressure. In a meta-analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors including studies up to 52 weeks, SGLT2 inhibitors produce improvements in HbA1c compared to placebo ( −0.66%) and active comparators (mean difference −0.06%). SGLT2 inhibitors reduce body weight (mean difference −1.8 kg) and systolic blood pressure (mean difference −4.45 mmHg). The risk of hypoglycemia was similar to that of metformin and DPP 4 inhibitors but less than that of SU.
| Difference Between Agents|| |
The SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice have structural similarity. Despite being highly selective inhibitors of SGLT2, these agents also inhibit SGLT1 to a minor extent. Among these molecules, empagliflozin has the highest selectivity for SGLT2 over SGLT1 (<2500-fold), followed by tofogliflozin (<1875-fold), dapagliflozin (1200-fold), ipragliflozin (550-fold), and canagliflozin (250-fold). In a double-blind, randomized, 2-period crossover study, canagliflozin 300 mg had a higher urinary glucose excretion and lower 24 h mean RTG compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg. Further 300 mg canagliflozin reduced and delayed the postprandial glucose excursion compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg. The potential role of action of SGLT1 inhibition in the intestine in addition to SGLT2 inhibition in the kidney by canagliflozin 300 mg is instrumental in producing these effects on postprandial sugars. These drugs have differences in drug interaction profile and pharmacokinetic profiles.
| Studies of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors With Insulin|| |
Being a drug active at any stage of diabetes and its advantages in reducing weight, it is logical to consider it as an add-on therapy to insulin. Use of SGLT2 inhibitor with insulin combination can fall under three broad categories:
- A subject with type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) including SGLT2 inhibitors getting initiated on basal/basal–bolus or premixed insulin
- A subject with type 2 diabetes with insulin initiated on SGLT2 inhibitors
- A subject with type 1 diabetes mellitus on insulin getting initiated on SGLT2 inhibitors.
There are studies of all FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin.,,,,, All these studies are in subjects of type 2 diabetes getting initiated on SGLT2 inhibitors or subjects with type 1 diabetes on insulin getting initiated on these agents. These studies are of variable duration, with a variable number of patients and with various types of insulin regimes. [Table 1] gives the design of these studies with type 2 diabetes. In most of these studies, insulin doses were kept constant over a period of 12–18 weeks. In studies of empagliflozin, a treat to target model has been used during a part of the study although it was investigator decision based., The salient features of baseline characteristics and results of these trials are given in [Table 2] and [Table 3].
|Table 1: Design of studies using SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin in type 2 diabetes|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Salient features of trials of SGLT2 with insulin in type 2 diabetes showing insulin regimes, change in insulin doses, weight, blood pressure, and renal parameters|
Click here to view
| Potential Benefits of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor+insulin Combination|| |
The benefits of combining insulin with SGLT2 inhibitors in subjects with type 2 diabetes have been explored in different studies.
Improvements in glycemic parameters
In these studies of add-on SGLT2 inhibitors to insulin regimes, there was a reduction in HbA1c. From a baseline HbA1c of 8.3–8.5%, there was a reduction of 0.2–0.7% over the study periods ranging from 12 weeks to 104 weeks. Although not compared head on, the maximum reduction was achieved with canagliflozin 300 mg. The reduction of HbA1c was by 0.73%(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63–0.83) at 52 weeks. In keeping with the same, the fasting plasma glucose reduction was also more in canagliflozin study. Postprandial sugars were not mentioned in all studies [Table 2]. The action of canagliflozin on SGLT1 in the intestine in addition to the SGLT2 inhibition in kidney can be a reason for this enhanced reduction. The trend of greater reduction in HbA1c with canagliflozin 300 mg compared to other SGLT2 inhibitors is evident also in meta-analysis data.
Improvements in weight
There was a placebo-subtracted weight loss of 2.39–3.5 kg in patients using SGLT2 inhibitors compared to placebo [Table 3]. This weight loss was achieved despite a higher proportion of patients reaching a target HbA1c and with a reduction of total daily dose of insulin. This data would not give the true change in insulin doses and improvement in glycaemic control as none of these trials were designed in treat to target mode throughout the duration of the study.
Weight loss in uncontrolled diabetes is due to glycosuria. Weight gain is one of the potential disadvantages of insulin therapy. Higher insulin dose along with higher baseline HbA1c and lower body mass index at baseline were factors associated with higher weight gain in subjects on insulin., Agents such as thiazolidinedione and SU used in association with insulin leads to weight gain. Using a combination of SGLT2 inhibitors and insulin would help nullify this challenge of weight gain. The body weight loss is due to calorie loss secondary to glycosuria and negative energy balance. Visceral fat loss in preference to subcutaneous fat loss was demonstrated by dual energy absorptiometry, computed tomography imaging, or magnetic resonance imaging in studies of SGLT2 inhibitors. This would help improve insulin sensitivity and would likely translate into CV benefits of these agents.
Improvements in blood pressure
Use of SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. This advantage of SGLT2 blockers was seen also in studies along with insulin. The mean reductions in blood pressure compared to placebo were higher in subjects receiving SGLT2 inhibitors [Table 3]. These were numerically higher than the pooled data of all SGLT2 inhibitors., The reduction in blood pressure is due to a combination of osmotic diuresis, natriuresis, weight loss, and possible effects of improved endothelial nitric oxide release due to better glycemic control., Since these agents produce natriuresis, it would likely counteract the sodium retention properties of insulin.
The favorable CV risk profile created by the use of SGLT2 inhibitor would favor positive CV outcomes; improved glycemia, reduced weight, reduced blood pressure, reduced uric acid, reduced visceral fat, and its ill effects. These favorable effects were reflected in the dedicated CV outcome trial of empagliflozin – EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. A similar improvement in CV risk profile was seen in studies with SGLT2 inhibitor-insulin combination also [Table 2] and [Table 3]. There are ongoing CV outcome trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors: Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events (DECLARE TIMI 58), Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) and CV outcomes following treatment with ertugliflozin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established vascular disease.
In EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, around 48% of subjects in all arms were on insulin although a separate analysis of this population is not available till date. The hazard ratio for primary composite outcome in this subgroup of insulin users was 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.75–1.13) compared to 0.61 (0 .44–0.85) among insulin nonusers.
SGLT2 inhibitors being a predominantly renal acting molecule, the renal outcomes are of interest. The possible effects on tubule glomerular feedback and improvement of renal disease progression are being pursued. In the trials of SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin, significant improvements in albumin: creatinine ratio (ACR) was seen with dapagliflozin and canagliflozin [Table 3]., Patients transitioning from normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria at baseline to microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria in the course of the study was less in subjects on SGLT2 inhibitors. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on reducing the ACR is mediated via the reduced sodium transport in the proximal tubule which leads to increased sodium delivery to the juxtaglomerular apparatus. This leads to a reduction in the glomerular pressure and reduction of glomerular hyperfiltration. This is hypothesized to be responsible for renoprotection by the activation of tubuloglomerular feedback.,, Further renal protection may be provided by an improvement in glycemic control, reduction in weight and blood pressure. However, during the course of these studies, there was a minor reduction in creatinine clearance in arms using SGLT2 inhibitors compared to placebo which stabilized in the course of the study and returned to baseline after treatment discontinuation.,, This early drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with SGLT2 inhibitors is attributed to modest diuretic effect and increased tubuloglomerular feedback, with resultant afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. Whether these early changes in GFR or changes in ACR translate to improved long term renal outcomes are not known., Long-term trials like CANVAS-R and CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) will give data on renal outcomes of using SGLT2 inhibitors beyond standard of care.
| Concerns While Using Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 and Insulin Combination Therapy|| |
Adding an oral agent to an insulin regime comes with its own share of adverse effects. Weight gain associated with the use of pioglitazone and SU with insulin and risk of hypoglycemia with SU are some of the drawbacks of insulin-OAD combinations. Concerns with the addition of SGLT2 blockers to insulin are related to various adverse effects.
Genital infections and urinary tract infections
In trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, there is a mildly increased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and moderately increased the risk for genital mycotic infections (GMI). In the meta-analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo or comparators, there was an increased incidence of UTIs (odds ratio [OR] 1. 34; 95% CI 1.03–1.74). These events were mild to moderate in intensity and were more common in females than males, whereas pyelonephritis was uncommon.
Moreover, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a marked increase of GMI(OR vs. placebo 3.50; 95% CI 2.46–2.99). The commonly reported events were vulvovaginal mycotic infections in females and balanitis in males; however, none of them was classified as serious. In studies of SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin, a similar increase in the risk of UTI and GMI has been found [Table 4]. Subjects with type 2 diabetes who are insulin users are generally older and more likely to have autonomic neuropathy involving bladder which predisposes them to UTI. However, the risk of vulvovaginitis is lower in postmenopausal women in the absence of risk factors such as uncontrolled diabetes and hormone replacement therapy. The incidence of GMI and UTI in subjects with SGLT2 inhibitor with insulin combination was similar to the overall pooled data of canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin.
|Table 4: Adverse effects of use of SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin: A comparison of pooled data of SGLT2 inhibitors with SGLT2 + insulin data|
Click here to view
SGLT2 inhibitors act by excreting glucose and thereby an extra volume of fluids by osmotic diuresis. Studies have shown that there is an extra 375ml of urine/day excreted with dapagliflozin 10 mg/day. Volume depletion-related adverse effects were captured in trials of SGLT2 inhibitors: reduced blood pressure, dehydration, postural dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic intolerance, syncope, and reduced urine output. In a pooled analysis, volume depletion-related adverse events occurred in 2.3% and 3.4% of canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg groups, respectively, versus 1.5% in the comparator groups. Risk factors for these events were more in subjects with age≥75 years, eGFR <60ml/min/1.73 m2, and use of loop diuretics.
Subjects with type 2 diabetes using insulin tend to be older, more likely to have reduced e GFR, CV disease, and autonomic neuropathy with altered baroreceptor reflex mechanisms. The insulin substudy of CANVAS recruited subjects at high CV risk. The subjects in this study had a mean age of 63 years and mean duration of diabetes of 16 years. In this study, 40% of patients had peripheral neuropathy although the prevalence of autonomic neuropathy was not mentioned. Adverse effects such as postural hypotension and dizziness were more in the canagliflozin groups although the risk was similar to a pooled group data of canagliflozin., Similarly, there was no increased risk of volume depletion-related adverse effects in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study, which had older patients and those with high CV risk.
The comparison data of volume related adverse effects of each of the SGLT2 inhibitors is given in [Table 4]. The overall incidence of volume-related adverse effects with SGLT2 inhibitor-insulin combination were similar to that of their data in the pooled analysis [Table 4].
Osmotic diuresis-related adverse effects
SGLT2 inhibitors produce osmotic diuresis due to glycosuria. The common osmotic diuresis-related adverse effects reported were pollakiuria, nocturia, micturition frequency, and thirst related (increased thirst, dry mouth, polydipsia, throat dry, or tongue dry). In studies with insulin, osmotic diuresis-related adverse were more common in subjects on SGLT2 inhibitors compared to those on placebo although these were comparable to the pooled dataset [Table 4].
The risk of hypoglycemia with SGLT2 inhibitors is similar to that of placebo when used as monotherapy or in association with metformin or DPP4 inhibitors., In use with Insulin and SU, they may potentiate the risk of hypoglycemia. In most trials of the use of SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin, the overall risk of hypoglycemia was similar in patients on the combination compared to patients using insulin alone. During the insulin constant phase in these trials, more hypoglycemia episodes were reported the SGLT2 inhibitor arm than in the placebo arm in keeping with the improvements in glycemic control.,,,
Possible risk of diabetic ketoacidosis
In May 2015, FDA warned that treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors may increase the risk of ketoacidosis based on 20 cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). One-third of these cases was in off-label use in type 1 diabetes. A total of 101 cases of diabetic ketoacidosis in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes had been reported worldwide in EudraVigilance as of May 19, 2015. Data from the FAERS, EudraVigilance, canagliflozin development program, and published case series show that there is disproportionately high representation of subjects with type 1 diabetes subjects, subjects with beta cell autoimmunity and those using insulin among those developing ketoacidosis with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. In most of these cases, a precipitating event was also recognized.,,,
The compromised beta cell function present in certain subgroups of type 2 diabetes subjects may make them at high risk of ketoacidosis. This includes patients with longer duration of diabetes, those with beta cell autoimmunity (e.g.latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) and patients with ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes. In subjects in UKPDS study, among subjects clinically diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, 11.6% have autoantibodies to various beta cell antigens. They were likely to require insulin earlier than subjects who are antibody negative.
Various mechanisms have been postulated to be associated with diabetic ketoacidosis in subjects using SGLT2 inhibitors. In subjects with type 2 diabetes on SGLT2 inhibitors, there is a significant loss of urinary glucose, which will reduce blood glucose and lead to loss of glucose stimuli to insulin (resulting in lower insulin levels) and increased glucagon concentration, partly driven by the loss of paracrine inhibition by insulin. The lower insulin: glucose ratio would increase gluconeogenesis in the liver and lipolysis in adipose tissue. This releases free fatty acids and leads to subsequent ketogenesis in the liver. In subjects with type 1 diabetes, reduction of insulin while adding SGLT2 inhibitors would lead to lipolysis and subsequent ketogenesis in the liver. Since blood sugars would be normal in this scenario due to increased urinary loss of sugars, the ketoacidosis would be euglycemic. Increased glucagon levels associated with SGLT 2 inhibitors leading to hepatic ketogenesis and reduced renal clearance of ketone bodies may contribute to ketogenesis.,
Clinicians using the insulin-SGLT2 inhibitor combinations should be aware of these potential mechanisms leading on to ketoacidosis. Since the blood sugars may remain normal in these subjects due to urinary loss of sugar, and urinary ketones may not be significantly elevated due to reduced urinary clearance of ketones, the diagnosis of this “euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis” may be delayed. Demonstrating ketonemia and metabolic acidosis even in the face of reasonably normal blood sugars in an unwell patient will form the key to diagnosis. In conditions such as sepsis, surgical stress, intensive care, dehydration, starvation, vomiting, and trauma, there is a tendency for ketogenesis due to increase in counter-regulatory hormones. Subjects should be advised to withhold SGLT2 inhibitors during these scenarios, check blood sugars and serum ketones and refrain from reducing the dose of insulin drastically. They should be educated to inform the health care team if the situation is not under control. In the scenario of elective surgery, stopping of SGLT2 inhibitor well in advance would be warranted as the effects of these drugs may remain beyond the duration of action.
Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to insulin therapy will escalate the cost of therapy. However, the added benefits of HbA1c reduction, blood pressure reduction, weight reduction, potential favorable effects on renal disease progression, and reduction in insulin dose should be weighed against the cost of therapy. As an add-on therapy to insulin, dapagliflozin was proven to be cost effective in the Dutch population. The implications of the superiority of empagliflozin in reducing mortality and CV events in EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial underscores the need to study the cost effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitor-insulin combination therapy.
SGLT2 inhibitors have mild effects in elevating both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) while maintaining an unaltered LDL: HDL ratio. Most trials of SGLT2 inhibitors with insulin gave limited information of this parameter.
| Conclusion|| |
The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes subjects on insulin has major advantages in terms of dose reduction of insulin, reducing HbA1c and blood sugars, reduction of weight, and reduction of blood pressures. Currently, SGLT2 inhibitors are approved for use in this setting. However, the associated problems with this combination should be kept in mind. There is a moderately increased risk of GMI and possible a mild increase in UTI. Further, being older subjects, there is a higher risk of compromised renal function and a higher risk of volume related and osmotic diuresis-related in these subjects although clinical trials have not shown these risks conclusively. In younger patients who progress on to early requirement for insulin, there is a potential risk of underlying beta cell autoimmunity and thereby the risk of ketoacidosis in situations which predispose patients to the same. It would be wise to understand the beta cell status of these patients and their endogenous insulin reserve before initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. Patient and provider education would form the key to the judicious use of this combination.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
Mathew John has received lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Astra Z.neca/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp and Dohme and Novartis and Sanofi India.
Deepa Gopinath: None.
Rejitha Jagesh: None.
| References|| |
Yesudian CA, Grepstad M, Visintin E, Ferrario A. The economic burden of diabetes in India: A review of the literature. Global Health 2014;10:80.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1033-46.
Ramachandran A, Ramachandran S, Snehalatha C, Augustine C, Murugesan N, Viswanathan V, et al.
Increasing expenditure on health care incurred by diabetic subjects in a developing country: A study from India. Diabetes Care 2007;30:252-6.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837-53.
Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577-89.
Shivashankar R, Kirk K, Kim WC, Rouse C, Tandon N, Narayan KM, et al.
Quality of diabetes care in low-and middle-income Asian and Middle Eastern countries (1993-2012): 20-year systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015;107:203-23.
Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2271-9.
American Diabetes Association.(7) Approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care 2015;38 Suppl:S41-8.
Zangeneh F, Arora PS, Dyck PJ, Bekris L, Lernmark A, Achenbach SJ, et al.
Effects of duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus on insulin secretion. Endocr Pract 2006;12:388-93.
Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, Cull CA, Holman RR; U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Sulfonylurea inadequacy: Efficacy of addition of insulin over6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. prospective diabetes study (UKPDS 57). Diabetes Care 2002;25:330-6.
Yki-Järvinen H. Combination therapies with insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:758-67.
Yki-Järvinen H, Ryysy L, Nikkilä K, Tulokas T, Vanamo R, Heikkilä M. Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:389-96.
Handelsman Y, Bloomgarden ZT, Grunberger G, Umpierrez G, Zimmerman RS, Bailey TS, et al.
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology–Clinical practice guidelines for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan–2015. Endocr Pract 2015;21 Suppl 1:1-87.
McFarland MS, Knight TN, Brown A, Thomas J. The continuation of oral medications with the initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: A review of the evidence. South Med J 2010;103:58-65.
Clar C, Royle P, Waugh N. Adding pioglitazone to insulin containing regimens in type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2009;4:E6112.
Vora J. Combining incretin-based therapies with insulin: Realizing the potential in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36 Suppl 2:S226-32.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al.
Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2117-28.
Mosley JF 2nd
, Smith L, Everton E, Fellner C. Sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the management of type-2 diabetes: Adrug class overview. P T 2015;40:451-62.
Nauck MA. Update on developments with SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014;8:1335-80.
Rahmoune H, Thompson PW, Ward JM, Smith CD, Hong G, Brown J. Glucose transporters in human renal proximal tubular cells isolated from the urine of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54:3427-34.
Liu JJ, Lee T, DeFronzo RA. Why Do SGLT2 inhibitors inhibit only 30-50% of renal glucose reabsorption in humans? Diabetes 2012;61:2199-204.
Lu Y, Griffen SC, Boulton DW, Leil TA. Use of systems pharmacology modeling to elucidate the operating characteristics of SGLT1 and SGLT2 in renal glucose reabsorption in humans. Front Pharmacol 2014;5:274.
Haas B, Eckstein N, Pfeifer V, Mayer P, Hass MD. Efficacy, safety and regulatory status of SGLT2 inhibitors: Focus on canagliflozin. Nutr Diabetes 2014;4:E143.
Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Mainou M, Liakos A, Bekiari E, et al.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:262-74.
Sha S, Polidori D, Farrell K, Ghosh A, Natarajan J, Vaccaro N, et al.
Pharmacodynamic differences between canagliflozin and dapagliflozin: Results of a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:188-97.
Polidori D, Sha S, Mudaliar S, Ciaraldi TP, Ghosh A, Vaccaro N, et al.
Canagliflozin lowers postprandial glucose and insulin by delaying intestinal glucose absorption in addition to increasing urinary glucose excretion: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2154-61.
Wilding JP, Woo V, Soler NG, Pahor A, Sugg J, Rohwedder K, et al.
Long-term efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving high doses of insulin: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:405-15.
Wilding JP, Woo V, Rohwedder K, Sugg J, Parikh S; Dapagliflozin Study Group. Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: Efficacy and safety over 2 years. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:124-36.
Neal B, Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Ways K, et al.
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, an inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, when used in conjunction with insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:403-11.
Rosenstock J, Jelaska A, Zeller C, Kim G, Broedl UC, Woerle HJ; EMPA-REG BASALTM Trial Investigators. Impact of empagliflozin added on to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin: A 78-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:936-48.
Rosenstock J, Jelaska A, Frappin G, Salsali A, Kim G, Woerle HJ, et al.
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1815-23.
Wilding JP, Norwood P, T'joen C, Bastien A, List JF, Fiedorek FT. A study of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin plus insulin sensitizers: Applicability of a novel insulin-independent treatment. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1656-62.
Henry RR, Rosenstock J, Edelman S, Mudaliar S, Chalamandaris AG, Kasichayanula S, et al.
Exploring the potential of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Diabetes Care 2015;38:412-9.
Balkau B, Home PD, Vincent M, Marre M, Freemantle N. Factors associated with weight gain in people with type 2 diabetes starting on insulin. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2108-13.
Jansen HJ, Vervoort GM, de Haan AF, Netten PM, de Grauw WJ, Tack CJ. Diabetes-related distress, insulin dose, and age contribute to insulin-associated weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a prospective study. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2710-7.
Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Wanner C, Ferrari R, Fitchett D, Hantel S, et al.
SGLT-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: Proposed pathways and review of ongoing outcome trials. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2015;12:90-100.
Majewski C, Bakris GL. Blood pressure reduction: An added benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:429-30.
Brands MW, Manhiani MM. Sodium-retaining effect of insulin in diabetes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2012;303:R1101-9.
De Nicola L, Gabbai FB, Liberti ME, Sagliocca A, Conte G, Minutolo R. Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and prevention of diabetic nephropathy: Targeting the renal tubule in diabetes. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:16-24.
Maltese G, Abou-Saleh A, Gnudi L, Karalliedde J. Preventing diabetic renal disease: The potential reno-protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. Br J Diab Vasc Dis 2015;15:114-8.
Stanton RC. Sodium glucose transport 2 (SGLT2) inhibition decreases glomerular hyperfiltration: Is there a role for SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease? Circulation 2014;129:542-4.
Kohan DE, Fioretto P, Tang W, List JF. Long-term study of patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment shows that dapagliflozin reduces weight and blood pressure but does not improve glycemic control. Kidney Int 2014;85:962-71.
Nitzan O, Elias M, Chazan B, Saliba W. Urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Review of prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2015;8:129-36.
Achkar JM, Fries BC. Candida
infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010;23:253-73.
Costi M, Dilla T, Reviriego J, Castell C, Goday A. Clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of insulin initiation: INSTIGATE observational study in Spain. Acta Diabetol 2010;47 Suppl 1:169-75.
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA Warns that SGLT2 Inhibitors for Diabetes May Result in a Serious Condition of Too Much Acid in the Blood. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm446845.htm
. [Last cited on 2015 Sep 26].
Erondu N, Desai M, Ways K, Meininger G. Diabetic ketoacidosis and related events in the canagliflozin type 2 diabetes clinical program. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1680-6.
Peters AL, Buschur EO, Buse JB, Cohan P, Diner JC, Hirsch IB. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: Apotential complication of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1687-93.
Balasubramanyam A, Nalini R, Hampe CS, Maldonado M. Syndromes of ketosis-prone diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev 2008;29:292-302.
Davis TM, Wright AD, Mehta ZM, Cull CA, Stratton IM, Bottazzo GF, et al.
Islet autoantibodies in clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes: Prevalence and relationship with metabolic control (UKPDS 70). Diabetologia 2005;48:695-702.
Rosenstock J, Ferrannini E. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: A predictable, detectable, and preventable safety concern with SGLT2 inhibitors. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1638-42.
Taylor SI, Blau JE, Rother KI. SGLT2 inhibitors may predispose to ketoacidosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:2849-52.
van Haalen HG, Pompen M, Bergenheim K, McEwan P, Townsend R, Roudaut M. Cost effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin to insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands. Clin Drug Investig 2014;34:135-46.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Comparative Efficacy and Safety Among Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes – Results from a Retrospective Single-centre Study
| ||Manash P Baruah,Sanjay Kalra |
| ||European Endocrinology. 2019; 15(2): 113 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||BE-SMART (Basal Early Strategies to Maximize HbA1c Reduction with Oral Therapy): Expert Opinion
| ||Sarita Bajaj,A. K. Das,Sanjay Kalra,Rakesh Sahay,Banshi Saboo,Sambit Das,M. Shunmugavelu,Jubbin Jacob,Gagan Priya,Deepak Khandelwal,Deep Dutta,Manoj Chawla,Vineet Surana,Mangesh Tiwaskar,Ameya Joshi,Pradip Krishna Shrestha,Jyoti Bhattarai,Bishwajit Bhowmik,Tint Swe Latt,Than Than Aye,G. Vijayakumar,Manash Baruah,Fatema Jawad,A. G. Unnikrishnan,Subhankar Chowdhury,Md. Faruqe Pathan,Noel Somasundaram,Manilka Sumanathilaka,Abbas Raza,Silver K. Bahendeka,Ankia Coetzee,Sundeep Ruder,Kaushik Ramaiya,Roberta Lamptey,Charlotte Bavuma,Khalid Shaikh,Andrew Uloko,Sandeep Chaudhary,Abdurezak Ahmed Abdela,Zhanay Akanov,Joel Rodrìguez-Saldaña,Raquel Faradji,Armindo Tiago,Ahmed Reja,Leszek Czupryniak |
| ||Diabetes Therapy. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Hormonal, Metabolic and Hemodynamic Adaptations to Glycosuria in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter Inhibitors
| ||Eugenio Cersosimo,John M. Miles |
| ||Current Diabetes Reviews. 2019; 15(4): 314 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||EudraVigilance Medicines Safety Database: Publicly Accessible Data for Research and Public Health Protection
| ||Rodrigo Postigo,Sabine Brosch,Jim Slattery,Anja van Haren,Jean-Michel Dogné,Xavier Kurz,Gianmario Candore,Francois Domergue,Peter Arlett |
| ||Drug Safety. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in combination with insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
| ||Nobuya Inagaki,Shin-ichi Harashima,Kohei Kaku,Kazuoki Kondo,Nobuko Maruyama,Makiko Otsuka,Yutaka Kawaguchi,Hiroaki Iijima |
| ||Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Euglycemic Ketoacidosis With Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor
| ||Richard A. Koch,Richard F. Clark |
| ||American Journal of Therapeutics. 2017; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Efficacy and safety of tofogliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycaemic control on insulin therapy (J-STEP/INS): Results of a 16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial
| ||Yasuo Terauchi,Masahiro Tamura,Masayuki Senda,Ryoji Gunji,Kohei Kaku |
| ||Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Combined insulin detemir and liraglutide therapy in type 2 diabetic patients: a base for an alliance
| ||Lyudmila Alexandrovna Ruyatkina,Maxim Sorokin |
| ||Diabetes mellitus. 2017; 20(2): 142 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||When Insulin Therapy Fails: The Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
| ||Stewart B. Harris,Selam Mequanint,Kristina Miller,Sonja M. Reichert,Tamara Spaic |
| ||Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(10): e141 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Cardiovascular safety of therapies for type 2 diabetes
| ||Puneet Gupta,William B. White |
| ||Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2016; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|