Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 603 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 
Table of Contents
EDITORIAL
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 5-8

Biosimilar insulins: Informed choice for South Asia


1 Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India
2 Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Bangladesh
3 Department of Endocrinology, Shaukhat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
4 Department of Endocrinology, The National Hospital of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
5 Department of Endocrinology, Norvic International Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
6 BIRDEM Academy, Dhaka, Bangladesh
7 Department of Medicine, MLN Medical College, Allahabad, India
8 Department of Endocrinology, BIRDEM Academy, Dhaka, Bangladesh
9 Department of Endocrinology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, India
10 Professor Emeritus and National Council Member, BADAS, Bangladesh

Date of Web Publication21-Dec-2015

Correspondence Address:
Sanjay Kalra
Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.164033

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kalra S, Azad Khan A K, Raza SA, Somasundaram N, Shrestha D, Latif ZA, Bajaj S, Pathan M, Sahay R, Mahtab H. Biosimilar insulins: Informed choice for South Asia. Indian J Endocr Metab 2016;20:5-8

How to cite this URL:
Kalra S, Azad Khan A K, Raza SA, Somasundaram N, Shrestha D, Latif ZA, Bajaj S, Pathan M, Sahay R, Mahtab H. Biosimilar insulins: Informed choice for South Asia. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 19];20:5-8. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2016/20/1/5/164033


   Diabetes Care Top


As diabetes has become endemic in South Asia, we, as health care professionals, have to reassess our strategy to tackle the condition. One way in which this is done is by encouraging development, and rational usage, of modern pharmaceuticals. Such drugs are expected to be effective, safe and well-tolerated. In a chronic condition such as diabetes, it is imperative to be aware not only of short-term side effects, but of the potential for long-term adverse consequences as well.


   Evolution of Insulin Top


The glucose-lowering drug in existence for the longest period of time is insulin. For almost a century now, insulin has helped save the lives of millions of people with diabetes. Over the decades, however, the type and quality of insulin has changed significantly. Newer methods of manufacturing have allowed production of larger amounts of effective, pure drug forms. This has been achieved by using recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid technology, with either bacteria ( Escherichia More Details coli) or yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris) as host.[1] The use of these living organisms, as vectors for insulin synthesis, classifies insulin, along with other hormones, like a biological product [Table 1]. Enhanced awareness about the “therapeutic triad"(efficacy, safety, and tolerability) has prompted stringent regulatory processes, which ensure that no innovator biological molecule reaches the customer without going through a robust preclinical and clinical development program.
Table 1: Definitions

Click here to view



   Biosimilars Top


At the same time, however, copies of such innovator biological products are being produced. These copies, termed as biosimilars, are marketed in regulated countries after expiry of patent production, but have been made available in less regulated markets (e.g.China) even prior to this. Biosimilars may be similar to, but are not exactly the same as, generics, or originator/innovator biological products [Table 2] and [Table 3].[2],[3]
Table 2: Comparison of biosimilar and generic drugs

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparison of biosimilars and innovator molecules

Click here to view


Analogies to biosimilars can be drawn from the scientific world. To explain the concept, biosimilar products may be compared with water vapor, water, and ice: All have the same chemical formula (H2O) but have totally different structures. Similarly, diamond, coal, and graphite are the same carbon atom, but totally dissimilar in appearance. To take a typically South Asian analogy, various varieties of mango, rice, or fish, may be biosimilar to each other, but are in no way the same. The average South Asian can easily distinguish between farm-grown and wild catch fish; various types of mango; or different types of rice. In a similar fashion, the diabetes care professional understands the subtle defining characteristics of an original biologic and its follow-ons on copies.


   South Asian Scenario Top


South Asia is known as the drug factory of the world. Large pharmaceutical manufacturers, in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan, meet both domestic and international demand. While no biosimilar insulin is approved in USA as of date August 2015, the European Medicines Agency and Japanese drug regulatory authorities have given approval to only one insulin-a biosimilar insulin glargine produced by Eli Lilly (Abasria).[4],[5] The number of biosimilar insulin approvals in some South Asian countries is more, however [Table 4].
Table 4: Biosimilar insulins and insulin analogs marketed in South Asia

Click here to view


Most South Asian countries have well laid out regulatory pathways for biosimilar approval. India, for example, expects a biosimilar to prove efficacy for each indication that it is approved in.[6] Sri Lanka is one nation which has applied strict World Health Organization (WHO) good manufacturing practice rules.[7] Sri Lanka now requires all biosimilars applying for approval to demonstrate safety and efficacy through a locally conducted randomized controlled trial. This has resulted in many poorly studied biosimilars losing their license. The Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, in its position paper on biosimilars, has also called for national regulatory guidelines to conform to those of the WHO.[8]


   Patient's Perspective Top


Studies have been carried out in the West to assess public opinion regarding biosimilars. In an American study of 3214 patients with diabetes, 27% replied that they would “definitely use” biosimilar while 13% and 4% stated they would be “unlikely to use” and “definitely not use” biosimilars, respectively. Participants mentioned that they would consider the delivery device, brand quality, and trust as significant factors in their decision not to take biosimilars. While many respondents appeared to favor biosimilars because of low cost, there were a few who were hesitant to switch for precisely the same reason: They equated low cost with low quality.[9]

In another survey of 629 Americans, only 9% persons with Type 2 diabetes and 27% of Type 1 diabetes were familiar with the term “biosimilar.” Though 30% prescribers and 12% pharmacists said, they used biosimilars, almost all of them identified biosimilars wrongly. Awareness about regulatory pathways for approval of biosimilars was poor.[10] The studies mentioned above reflect the need for aggressive public and health provider education before biosimilars can be used safely.


   Challenges With Biosimilars Top


The approval and use of biosimilars is associated with novel challenges, which must be met by sustained awareness and education campaigns.[10] All stakeholders in diabetes care, including regulatory authorities, prescribers, counselors, pharmacists, and patients, should be aware of the distinction between biosimilars and innovator products [Table 5].[11],[12]
Table 5: Clinical issues with biosimilar use

Click here to view


Efficacy and safety

Health cost payers, whether governmental authorities or insurance companies, are faced with the challenge of achieving “health for all” within a limited budget. Therefore, they tend to prefer economical drugs.[11]

Insulin, however, is different from other pharmaceutical compounds. Insulin potency can be affected by variations in the raw material source, production process, and factory equipment. The presence of host-related, process-related, and product-related impurities may cause differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. There is a theoretical risk of formation of insulin-neutralizing antibodies, and “iatrogenic” insulin resistance, if frequent switching of insulin preparations is done.[11]

Labeling

Labeling of marketed products must clearly mention the name of the biological molecule, its method of production, and whether it is an originator or biosimilar drug. As all preparations of aspart insulin or glargine insulin, for example, cannot be equated with each other, the trade name, or unique identifying name must be used. Biological product usage is different from generic prescription in this regard. The product insert should clarify which indications the molecule has been studied in, as opposed to which indications it is approved for.[13]

Substitution

Substitution of biological products carries potential for harm. No insulin preparation should be substituted unless clinically indicated. The substitution must be informed to the patient, and frequency of clinical as well as glycemic monitoring stepped up in such cases. The need to avoid insulin substitution is an integral part of insulin technique guidelines.[14]

Pharmacovigilance

Pharmacovigilance data must reflect the actual product being described, whether biosimilar or innovator. Arecent report of hypersensitivity to biosimilar glargine is an exemplar of this concern.[15] Just as the safety of biosimilars is of paramount importance, so is efficacy. There is evidence that higher doses of biosimilar insulin are needed to achieve glycemic control.[16]


   Patient-Centred Approach Top


Modern diabetes care prides itself upon a patient-centered approach, which respects the patient's attitudes, wishes, and needs. Such an attitude is evident in Ayurveda teachings from India and is exemplified by the behavior and work of great pioneers such as National Professor Mohammed Ibrahim of Bangladesh.[17],[18] To achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes, we practice informed, shared decision making with the patients in every sphere of diabetes management.

Such combined decision making should extend to choice of insulin preparations. Patients should be able to make an informed choice regarding the choice of originator or biosimilar molecules, based upon available evidence, and socioeconomic reality. All factors which may influence this decision, including robustness of clinical data, quality of cold chain maintenance, and availability of postmarketing pharmacovigilance activities, should be made public.[19],[20]

Our call for shared decision-making, based upon informed choices, is not in contradiction to earlier recommendations for prescriber-based choice (as suggested by the American College of Rheumatology).[21] The prescriber, too, is an integral part of shared decision making. In a chronic disease such as diabetes, the choice of therapy cannot be dictated by a single shareholder, whether physician, pharmacist or payer. The patient has the right to participate in management-related decisions and choose the best available (or optimal product for himself or herself).


   Conclusion Top


As the diabetes pharmacotherapeutic arena expands, more debate and discussion will be needed to decide appropriate, patient-friendly means of using newer insulins. Regulatory authorities will need to apply stringent mechanisms to ensure that only scientifically rational molecules, with robust preclinical and clinical development programs, are approved for use. Once and biosimilar are required to conform to stringent rule as applied to innovators, quality will be assured.

Postapproval pharmacovigilance must be maintained, in order to ensure safety and tolerability. The patient, along with prescriber,(and payer, if relevant) should be allowed to take shared, informed decisions regarding the insulin they wish to use. This will be “patient-centeredness” in its true spirit.

 
   References Top

1.
Sandow J, Landgraf W, Becker R, Seipke G. Equivalent recombinant human insulin preparations and their place in therapy. Eur Endocrinol 2015;11:10-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Seshiah V, Das AK, Sethi BK, Moses CR, Kumar A, Viswanathan V, et al. Biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars: A consensus statement. Available from: http://apiindia.org/medicine_update_2013/chap52.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Aug 14].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Minocha M, Gobburu J. Drug development and potential regulatory paths for insulin biosimilars. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
First Biosimilar Insulin, Glargine, Approved in EU. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/831441.[Last accessed on 2015 Aug 14].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Japanese approval for insulin glargine biosimilar. Available from: http://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/News/Japanese-approval-for-insulin-glargine-biosimilar.[Last accessed on 2015 Aug 14].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Guidelines on Similar Biologics: Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authorizations in India. Available from: http://www.dbtbiosafety.nic.in/Files%5CCDSCO-DBTSimilarBiologicsfinal.pdf.[Last accessed on 2015 Aug 14].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: Main principles. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/TRS986annex2.pdf.[Last accessed on 2015 Aug 14].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
OPPI Position paper on Biosimilars. Available from: http://www.indiaoppi.com/sites/default/files/PDF%20files/OPPI%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Biosimilars.pdf.[Last accessed on 2015 Aug 14].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Wilkins AR, Venkat MV, Brown AS, Dong JP, Ran NA, Hirsch JS, et al. Patient perspectives on biosimilar insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:23-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dolinar RO, Edelman S, Heinemann L, Home P, Goyal S, Polonsky WH, et al. Impact of biosimilar insulins on clinical practice: Meeting report. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:179-185.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Carter A. multiple source biosimilar insulin, what's a provider to do? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:20-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Carter AW. FDA-approved biosimilar insulin: Good enough for critical care, adulterated, or counterfeit? How can we tell? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:1052-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kalra S, Kalra B, PandeyN. Biosimilar medical products: What a physician needs to know. Internet J Fam Pract 2009;8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara YP, Baruah MP, Chadha M, Chandalia HB, et al. Forum for Injection Technique (FIT), India: The Indian recommendations 2.0, for best practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2015. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2015;19:317-31.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
García-Nares H, Leyva-Carmona MI, Pérez-Xochipa N, Chiquete E. Hypersensitivity reaction to a biosimilar insulin glargine. J Diabetes 2015;7:155-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Segal D, Tupy D, Distiller L. The biosulin equivalence in standard therapy (BEST) study - A multicentre, open-label, non-randomised, interventional, observational study in subjects using biosulin 30/70 for the treatment of insulin-dependent type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. SAfr Med J 2013;103:458-60.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kalra S, Kalra B, Agrawal N. Therapeutic patient education: Lessons from ayurveda–The quadruple of Atreya. Internet J Geriatr Gerontol 2009;5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kalra S, SiddiquiNI. Bangladeshi leadership in diabetology: Insights from DAWN 2 study. Mymensingh Med J 2014;23:205-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Polimeni G, Trifirò G, Ingrasciotta Y, Caputi AP. The advent of biosimilars for the treatment of diabetes: Current status and future directions. Acta Diabetol 2015;52:423-31.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Heinemann L, Home PD, Hompesch M. Biosimilar insulins: Guidance for data interpretation by clinicians and users. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015. doi: 1111/dom.12491.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
American College of Rheumatology Position Statement. Available from: http://www.rheumatology.org/Portals/0/Files/Biosimilars.pdf.[Last accessed on 2015 Aug 17].  Back to cited text no. 21
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Cross-sectional survey of biosimilar insulin utilization in Asia: The Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation Program
Linsey Gani,Eric Lau,Andrea Luk,Leorino Sobrepena,Quang Khanh Tran,Jothydev Kesavadev,Weiping Jia,Weinan Yu,Chiu Chi Tsang,Monojitketan Mukhopadhyay,Sujeet Jha,Wayne Sheu,Yoon Kun Ho,Thy Khue Nguyen,Risa Ozaki,Wing Yee So,Christine Kwan,Amy W C Fu,Roberto Mirasol,Sanjeev Ratnakar Phatak,Kanakatte Mylariah Prasanna Kumar,Sosale Aravind,Hari Janakiraman,Juliana C N Chan
Journal of Diabetes Investigation. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Diabetes Care Evolution of Insulin Biosimilars South Asian Scenario Patient's Pe... Challenges With ... Patient-Centred ... Conclusion Article Tables
  In this article
 References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1404    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded430    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal