|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 189-194
Effect of Vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes subjects in Lagos, Nigeria
Anthony Chinedu Anyanwu1, Olufemi Adetola Fasanmade1, Ifedayo Adetola Odeniyi1, Sandra Iwuala1, Herbert Babatunde Coker2, Augustine Efedaye Ohwovoriole1
1 Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
2 Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||15-Feb-2016|
Anthony Chinedu Anyanwu
Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Unit, Federal Medical Centre, Owerri, PMB 1010, Owerri, Imo State
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Improvement of glycemic control reduces the risk of diabetic complications. Reports suggest that Vitamin D supplementation improves glycemia. However, there are no data on the influence of Vitamin D on diabetes mellitus (DM) in Nigeria. Objective: To determine the effect of Vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in Type 2 DM (T2DM) participants with Vitamin D deficiency.Design: This was a single-blind, prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial, involving T2DM participants attending the Diabetes Clinic of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Forty-two T2DM participants with poor glycemic control and Vitamin D deficiency were selected following a prior cross-sectional study on 114 T2DM participants for the determination of Vitamin D status and glycemia. These participants were randomized into two equal groups of treatment and placebo arms. Intervention: Three thousand IU of Vitamin D3were given to the participants in the treatment arm. Glycemic status was determined at baseline and after 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Vitamin D3 supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in serum Vitamin D level and fasting plasma glucose in the treatment arm compared to placebo. There was a nonsignificant reduction in the mean HbA1c level in the treatment group after 12 weeks of Vitamin D3 supplementation (Z = −1.139; P = 0.127) compared to the placebo group, which had a further increase in the mean HbA1c level (Z = −1.424; P = 0.08). The proportion of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 6.5%) who converted to good control after Vitamin D supplementation was significantly higher in the treatment arm compared to placebo (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Vitamin D3 supplementation in persons with T2DM and Vitamin D deficiency results in a significant improvement in glycemic control.
Keywords: Glycemic control, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Vitamin D supplementation
|How to cite this article:|
Anyanwu AC, Fasanmade OA, Odeniyi IA, Iwuala S, Coker HB, Ohwovoriole AE. Effect of Vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes subjects in Lagos, Nigeria. Indian J Endocr Metab 2016;20:189-94
|How to cite this URL:|
Anyanwu AC, Fasanmade OA, Odeniyi IA, Iwuala S, Coker HB, Ohwovoriole AE. Effect of Vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes subjects in Lagos, Nigeria. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jan 28];20:189-94. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2016/20/2/189/176345
| Introduction|| |
Type 2 diabetes has a major impact on the morbidity and mortality of the individual as well as on the quality of life. Controlling blood glucose minimizes the onset of micro- and macro-vascular complications and reduces the progression of existing ones. Poor glycemic control has been associated with several factors including Vitamin D deficiency.,
Vitamin D deficiency is a global health care concern. A growing number of studies have reported widespread Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in both apparently healthy populations and patients with various pathologies including diabetes mellitus (DM). It has been estimated that one billion people worldwide are affected by various degrees of Vitamin D deficiency. Since the first report on the influence of Vitamin D on insulin secretion, evidence has proposed a role for Vitamin D in both the occurrence  and treatment of Type 2 DM (T2DM)., There is now convincing evidence that Vitamin D has some role in both pancreatic insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity and thereby affects the pathogenesis of the disease.,
Several studies on the glycemic control of subjects with DM, done in various regions in Nigeria, have shown that poor glycemic control is common among Nigerian DM subjects.,,,
Reports suggest that Vitamin D supplementation improves glycemia.,,,, However, there are no data on the Vitamin D status or relationship between Vitamin D and DM in Nigeria.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in T2DM participants with poor glycemic control and Vitamin D deficiency.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a single-blind, prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial, involving T2DM participants attending the Diabetes clinic of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. The study participants consisted of 42 T2DM participants with poor glycemic control and Vitamin D deficiency selected following a prior cross-sectional study on 114 T2DM participants for the determination of Vitamin D status and glycemia. These participants were randomized into two equal groups of treatment and placebo arms.
Levels of serum Vitamin D, fasting glucose, HbA1c, calcium, albumin, phosphate, creatinine, and alanine transaminase were determined. Serum Vitamin D level was assessed by the high-performance liquid chromatography method. Vitamin D3 supplements (3000 IU daily) were given to the participants in the treatment arm and placebo (made of 50mg corn starch) given to the placebo arm.
Glycemic status was determined at baseline and after 12 weeks of Vitamin D3 supplementation in the treatment arm. Doses of their oral antidiabetics were kept constant during this period. The sample size was calculated using the formula below:
n = number of subjects required in each arm
d = standardized mean difference (an index of the intrinsic variability of the studied endpoint)
Target difference = The minimal effect size considered as clinically relevant expected to be found in this study
Cp.power = a constant defined by chosen P value and Power.
Cp.power = 7.9 (statistical significance of 0.05 and power of 80%).
Target difference of Vitamin D levels = 28 nmol/l,
Standard deviation (SD) = 31.0.
Standardized difference, d = 28/31 = 0.9.
The number of participants required in each arm of the trial, n:
N = 20 (nearest even number)
To allow for 10% attrition, a total of 44 subjects (22 subjects in each intervention-arm) were estimated to be used in the second phase interventional study.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study participants
The following groups of persons were eligible for recruitment into the study:
- Participants aged 35–65 years with T2DM and on oral antidiabetics
- Participants who gave informed consent
- T2DM participants with Vitamin D deficiency and poor glycemic control as evidenced by HbA1c > 6.5%.
Those who were excluded from the study were:
- Participants below 35 years or above 65 years
- Participants with T1DM
- T2DM participants on insulin (due to influence of insulin antibodies on serum insulin assay)
- Pregnant women (serum Vitamin D levels are generally low in pregnancy)
- Participants with chronic diseases including renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min), history of chronic liver disease or alanine transferase >5 times upper reference limit, tuberculosis, diarrheal, or malabsorption state.
Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States of America). Results were expressed as mean (SD) and percentages. Comparisons between treatment groups were made using Wilcoxon, Chi-square, and Z-tests. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
A total 45 (39.5%) T2DM participants had both low Vitamin D3 levels and poor glycemic control, three of them could not be reached, and hence, 42 participants were randomized into two equal arms of 21 participants each. The study response rate (study completers) at the end of 12 weeks, follow-up was 17 (80.9%) in the treatment arm, and 16 (76.2%) in the placebo arm. Participants' flow chart is shown on [Figure 1].
The mean age of the participants was 52.5 ± 2.2 in the treatment group and 51.1 ± 1.9 in the placebo group (P > 0.05). There were 10 (58.8%) females and 7 (41.2%) males in the treatment group, and 9 (56.3%) females and 7 (43.7%) males in the placebo group (χ2 = 0.02, P = 0.88).
Patients adherence assessed by tablet counts at each visit showed an overall adherence of 62.2% and 59.9% in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively. [Table 1] and [Table 2] show the effect of Vitamin D3 supplementation on biochemical variables in the treatment arm and the changes in the placebo arm.
|Table 1: Effect of Vitamin D3 supplementation on biochemical variables in treatment arm|
Click here to view
There was a significant reduction in the fasting plasma glucose in the treatment group compared to control group. Vitamin D3 supplementation significantly lowered the plasma fasting glucose levels in the treatment group on week 4 and week 8 (Friedman's test, χ2 = 8.46, P = 0.03). Post hoc analysis with Wilcoxon signed rank test was conducted with Bonferroni correction applied resulting in a significance level set at P < 0.013. A significant FPG reduction was noted at weeks 4 and 8 (Z = −2.39, P = 0.008 and Z = −2.43, P = 0.007, respectively). The FPG in the placebo group showed an insignificant drop on week 4 and then increased through weeks 8–12. (χ2 = 2.64, P = 0.45). The mean differences in serum Vitamin D3 and glycemia after 12 weeks of treatment are shown in [Table 3].
|Table 3: Mean changes in serum Vitamin D3 and glycemia after 12 weeks of treatment|
Click here to view
There was a nonsignificant drop in the mean HbA1c level in the treatment group after 12 weeks of Vitamin D3 supplementation (Z = −1.139; P = 0.127) compared to the placebo group, which had further increase in the mean HbA1c level (Z = −1.424; P = 0.08) as shown in [Figure 2].
The proportion of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 6.5%) who converted to good control after Vitamin D supplementation was significantly higher in the treatment arm compared to placebo (P < 0.05) as shown in [Figure 3].
|Figure 3:Proportions of Type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects with normal HbA1c status after treatment|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The proportion of females in this study was higher than the male counterpart, with female to male ratio of 1.4:1 in the treatment arm and 1.3:1 in the placebo arm. This is in contrast to some previously documented reports on an overall higher prevalence of diabetes in males than females. A possible explanation for this might be due to the higher life expectancy in females. In part, this finding may be a reflection of the female to male sex distribution of the diabetes subjects attending the diabetes clinic of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital where this study was carried out, which was put at 1.8. Greater use of hospital facility by women or lack of time to visit hospital by employed males may also be a reason.
Vitamin D3 supplementation in the treatment arm resulted in a significant increase in the serum Vitamin D3 concentration after 12 weeks of treatment compared to the placebo group, although the serum Vitamin D was still below normal. This may be due to the short duration of supplementation. Assessing the adequacy of Vitamin D replacement can prove difficult. This is partly due to methodology issues for measuring Vitamin D. There is often a lag time in response of measured Vitamin D levels to oral Vitamin D replacement. This is due to the highly fat soluble nature of Vitamin D and its distribution within the large body fat compartment, before distribution within the smaller extracellular fluid compartment. It takes several months to correct Vitamin D deficiency. For monitoring of response to Vitamin D replacement, it is best to measure serum Vitamin D, 3–4 months after commencing therapy.
This study found a significant reduction in mean FPG from baseline values, a drop in HbA1c levels in T2DM subjects after Vitamin D supplementation; whereas the FPG and HbA1c increased further in the placebo arm. In addition, the proportion of T2DM subjects with poor glycemic control who converted to good control after Vitamin D3 supplementation was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to control.
These findings are in agreement with the results of previous studies.,,,, Amal reported a significant reduction of the mean fasting blood glucose and HbA1C from baseline after 6 months of Vitamin D3 supplementation. Pittas et al. in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial reported that in healthy adults with impaired fasting blood glucose, supplementation with calcium and Vitamin D may attenuate increases in glycemia and insulin resistance that occur over time. In addition, a retrospective study conducted by Sabherwal et al. indicated that Vitamin D and calcium replacement therapy in South Asian patients with T2DM produced a significant decrease in both HbA1c and weight, which might be attributed to the increase in Vitamin D levels posttreatment. Consistent with finding of this study, Nikooyeh et al. showed that daily intake of a Vitamin D fortified yogurt drink, either with or without added calcium, improved glycemic status in T2DM patients.
- Study participants were assumed to have kept doses of other antidiabetics constant during the intervention period
- The study participants were also assumed not to be taking Vitamin D containing complimentary medicines alongside their medications during the intervention period
- It takes several months to correct Vitamin D deficiency. Measurement of response to Vitamin D therapy takes several months (at least 3–4 months).
The minimal changes in serum Vitamin D levels noted after supplementation in this study may be due to the reasons above. Longer periods of follow-up during supplementation would have been more ideal. However, this was not feasible due to time constraints and cost.
| Conclusion|| |
Vitamin D3 supplementation in persons with T2DM with Vitamin D deficiency and poor glycemic control results in a significant improvement in glycemic control. The findings of improvement in glycemic control may help us understand the role of Vitamin D on glycemia in persons with T2DM. An implication of this is the possibility of making decisions on the recommendation of Vitamin D treatment in persons with T2DM with Vitamin D deficiency and poor glycemic control in Nigeria.
Further research in this field would be of great help to confirm these findings, possibly with different Vitamin D3 doses, larger sample size, and a longer period of follow-up.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The diabetes control and complications trial research group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86.
Kant R, Chandra R, Arzumanyan H, Krug E. Prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency and association with glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective analysis. Endocr Rev 2010;31:221-6.
Unadike BC, Eregie A, Ohwovorhiole AE. Glycaemic control amongst persons with diabetes mellitus in Benin City. Niger Med J 2010;51:164-6.
Vieth R, Cole DE, Hawker GA, Trang HM, Rubin LA. Wintertime vitamin D insufficiency is common in young Canadian women, and their Vitamin D intake does not prevent it. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001;55:1091-7.
Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007;357:266-81.
Norman AW, Frankel JB, Heldt AM, Grodsky GM. Vitamin D deficiency inhibits pancreatic secretion of insulin. Science 1980;209:823-5.
Forouhi NG, Luan J, Cooper A, Boucher BJ, Wareham NJ. Baseline serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D is predictive of future glycemic status and insulin resistance: The Medical Research Council Ely Prospective Study 1990-2000. Diabetes 2008;57:2619-25.
Chiu KC, Chu A, Go VL, Saad MF. Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:820-5.
Borissova AM, Tankova T, Kirilov G, Dakovska L, Kovacheva R. The effect of Vitamin D3 on insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57:258-61.
John ME, Effiong MU, Essien OE, Compliance and glycaemic control in adult diabetic patients in rural Nigeria. Diabetes Int 2005;13:17-20.
Adebisi SA, Oghagbon EK, Akande TM, Olarinoye JK. Glycated haemoglobin and glycaemic control of diabetics in Ilorin. Niger J Clin Pract 2009;12:87-91.
Coker AO, Fasanmade AO. Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes in Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2005;16:6-9.
Pittas AG, Dawson-Hughes B, Li T, Van Dam RM, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al.
Vitamin D and calcium intake in relation to type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 2006;29:650-6.
Sabherwal S, Brans V, Devendra D. Effect of oral vitamin D and calcium replacement on glycaemic control in South Asian patients with Type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract 2010;64:1084-9.
Soric MM, Renner ET, Smith SR. Effect of daily Vitamin D supplementation on HbA1c in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study 2012;4:104-5.
Abdallah AY. Vitamin D supplementation and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a retrospective cohort study. Res J Med Med Sci 2012;7:44-50.
Nikooyeh B, Neyestani TR, Farvid M, Alavi-Majd H, Houshiarrad A, Kalayi A, et al
. Daily consumption of Vitamin D- or Vitamin D+calcium fortified yogurt drink improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:764-71.
Whitley E, Ball J. Statistics review 4: Sample size calculations. Crit Care 2002;6:335-41.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1047-53.
Working Group of the Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society; Endocrine Society of Australia; Osteoporosis Australia. Vitamin D and adult bone health in Australia and New Zealand: A position statement. Med J Aust 2005;182:281-5.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Effect of Treating Vitamin D Deficiency in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes
| ||Margaret C. Lo,Layla Abushamat,Lazarus K. Mramba |
| ||American Journal of Therapeutics. 2019; 26(4): e441 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
| || |
| ||Nutrients. 2018; 10(3): 375 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes
| ||Gautam Das |
| ||Practical Diabetes. 2017; 34(1): 19 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Glucose Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Intervention Studies
| ||Clare J. Lee,Geetha Iyer,Yang Liu,Rita R. Kalyani,Ní Dama Bamba,Colin B. Ligon,Sanskriti Varma,Nestoras Mathioudakis |
| ||Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Effect of Improved Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status on Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients: A Meta-Analysis
| ||Naghmeh Mirhosseini,Hassanali Vatanparast,Mohsen Mazidi,Samantha M Kimball |
| ||The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2017; 102(9): 3097 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Emerging Evidence for the Importance of Dietary Protein Source on Glucoregulatory Markers and Type 2 Diabetes: Different Effects of Dairy, Meat, Fish, Egg, and Plant Protein Foods
| ||Kevin Comerford,Gonca Pasin |
| ||Nutrients. 2016; 8(8): 446 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|