|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 404-409
Does one size fit everyone? Replacement dose of levothyroxine in long-standing primary hypothyroidismin adults
Department of Endocrinology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
|Date of Web Publication||2-May-2017|
Department of Endocrinology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad - 500 082, Telangana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objectives: The recommended starting dose of levothyroxine (LT4) in primary hypothyroidism is 1.6 μg/kg body weight and is based on presumption of minimal residual thyroid function in autoimmune hypothyroidism. This study aimed at finding the range and determining factors for LT4 dose in long-standing hypothyroidism. Methods: A cross-sectional study of individuals with primary autoimmune hypothyroidism on LT4 replacement was done between March 2015 and January 2016. Individuals enrolled were euthyroid based on recent serum thyroid-stimulating hormone. The inclusion criteria included LT4 intake in the morning empty stomach, maintenance of at least 1-h food gap, not on medications known to hamper LT4 absorption within 4 h of dosing, diagnosis of hypothyroidism at least for 1 year, and on a minimum 25 μg LT4. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 346 individuals (290 women and 56 men; 214 premenopausal and 76 postmenopausal women) were enrolled. The mean duration of hypothyroidism and age were 5.7 years and 42.1 years, respectively. The range and mean of absolute LT4 daily dose (ADD), LT4 dose based on body weight (D/W), and LT4 dose based on ideal body weight (D/IBW) were 25–200 μg daily and 77.1 μg, 0.3–2.82 μg/kg and 1.21 μg/kg, and 0.42–3.5 μg/kg and 1.58 μg/kg, respectively. Duration of hypothyroidism was significant predictors of ADD, D/W, and D/IBW. Gender-based difference in ADD and D/IBW was explained by gender difference in anthropometry. Conclusion: Long-standing primary autoimmune hypothyroidism has variable dose requirement of LT4 for achieving euthyroidism and may be dependent on the degree of residual functional thyroid. Duration of hypothyroidism was significant positive predictor for either ADD, D/W, or D/IBW.
Keywords: Duration of hypothyroidism, ideal body weight, levothyroxine, primary hypothyroidism
|How to cite this article:|
Singh R. Does one size fit everyone? Replacement dose of levothyroxine in long-standing primary hypothyroidismin adults. Indian J Endocr Metab 2017;21:404-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Singh R. Does one size fit everyone? Replacement dose of levothyroxine in long-standing primary hypothyroidismin adults. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 25];21:404-9. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2017/21/3/404/205488
| Introduction|| |
Conventionally, calculated daily dose of levothyroxine (LT4) is recommended for otherwise healthy and middle-aged patients for initiating treatment for primary hypothyroidism. The recommended initiating dose of LT4 is 1.6 μg/kg body weight in overt primary hypothyroidism of autoimmune etiology. Lower dose of LT4 is required in the elderly and has been suggested to be related to the decline in the lean body mass (LBM). The dose recommended in subclinical hypothyroidism is lower in comparison to overt hypothyroidism. However, fixed dose of LT4 has been suggested as starting dose for overt hypothyroidism.
Hashimoto's thyroiditis is the most common cause of primary hypothyroidism in iodine-sufficient areas and may have indolent course as suggested by studies in individuals of autoimmune subclinical hypothyroidism. The usual course of progression in Hashimoto's thyroiditis is gradual loss of thyroid function. Follow-up studies of the individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism in the elderly showed that a significant proportion of subclinical hypothyroidism cases with elevated or normal thyroid peroxidase antibody had normalization of serum thyrotropin (thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH]), while others progressed to overt hypothyroidism. Similar study in children showed a variable rate of progression of subclinical hypothyroidism to either overt hypothyroidism or normalization of thyroid profile. Hence, it can be presumed that in overt autoimmune primary hypothyroidism cases, the degree of thyroid damage may be variable.
Studies have evaluated the magnitude of replacement doses in primary hypothyroidism based on body weight. The dose of LT4 varies with the etiology of hypothyroidism. Although the average replacement dose of LT4 is approximately 1.6 μg/kg body weight in autoimmune hypothyroidism, the range of required dose is wide and varies from 25–50 to ≥200–225 μg/kg body weight. The recommended dose of 1.6 μg/kg is based on the assumption of minimal residual thyroid function. In addition, studies have shown that LT4 requirement in autoimmune thyroiditis is lesser when compared to complete athyrotic individuals., Hence, it can be presumed that the LT4 requirement to maintain euthyroidism in autoimmune hypothyroidism cases depends on the residual functional thyroid tissue, and the current recommended dose of LT4 in autoimmune hypothyroidism, i.e., 1.6 μg/kg body weight, may not be required by all the individuals of primary hypothyroidism.
The aim of this study was to find the range of LT4 dose based on body weight (D/W) and LT4 dose based on ideal body weight (D/IBW), and to find the determinants of LT4 requirement needed to maintain euthyroidism in individuals of primary autoimmune hypothyroidism.
| Methods|| |
The study was cross-sectional. The patients were enrolled prospectively.
Adults were enrolled prospectively from the follow-up cohort of the Outpatient Endocrinology Department of the Hospital visiting between May 2015 and January 2016. Individuals enrolled included men and women between ages 18 and 85 years with primary autoimmune hypothyroidism and on treatment for at least 1 year and on minimum dose of at least 25 μg of LT4 daily. Hashimoto's thyroiditis was defined as clinically presence of firm diffuse goiter or positive thyroid peroxidase antibody. The inclusion criteria included stable ambulatory patients with primary hypothyroidism, currently biochemically euthyroid based on the latest TSH report from the central laboratory with reference range serum TSH (0.4–4.5 mIU/L), LT4 dose administration in the morning and empty stomach dosing, and maintenance of food and beverages gap of at least 1 h with the LT4.
Exclusion criteria included noncompliant individuals, other than morning empty stomach administration of LT4, food gap with LT4 of <1 h, being on medication known to hamper LT4 absorption within 4 h of LT4, hypothyroidism other than of autoimmune etiology like postradioiodine, thyroid cancer postsurgery, posttotal thyroidectomy, pregnancy, and central hypothyroidism. Euthyroidism was defined as a serum TSH within the range of 0.4–5. Historical values of serum TSH was not taken, and a recent value from the Central Laboratory was compulsory for enrollment. Good compliance for LT4 as Confirmed by history was needed for inclusion.
Institutional review board approval was taken for the study and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants before enrollment.
All consecutive patients willing for enrollment and meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The data collected included age, gender, height, body weight, menopausal status for women, compliance with medication, co-prescription within 4 h of LT4, and food gap with LT4. Body weight was recorded with electronic weighing scales. Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated based on Devine formula as follows: women over 152 cm, 45 kg + 2.3 kg for each additional 2.5 cm; for women under 152 cm, 45 kg − 2.3 kg for each additional 2.5 cm; for men over 152 cm, 48 kg + 2.7 kg for each additional 2.5 cm. Degree of overweight was calculated by dividing weight by IBW. The latest TSH done in the central laboratory of the institute and the current LT4 dose were noted.
Serum TSH analysis was performed by chemiluminescence immunoassay method (Roche Cobas e411) with functional sensitivity of 0.005 mIU/L, and normal range 0.4–4.5 mIU/L. Lyophilized quality control material (Bio-rad) was used with mean values of three levels of controls – 0.46, 5.52, and 34.2 mIU/L. The inter- and intra-assay variability levels were 2.9 and 3 mIU/L, respectively.
Continuous variables were summarized as means and standard deviations and range as minimum and maximum values. The percentile of LT4 absolute dose, D/W, and dose based on ideal body weight (D/IBW) was calculated at 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile. ANOVA was used to compare the groups, and Bonferroni correction was used as post hoc test. Correlation was assessed by Pearson's method and all the correlation analyses were two tailed. Linear regression model was used for univariate and multivariate predictive regression analyses. Initially, all the variables were entered with stepwise, forward, and backward method of variable entry to find the best predictive independent variables and finally ENTER method was used with all the best predictive variables. Collinearity of independent variables was checked based on tolerance. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant
| Results|| |
A total of 346 individuals (a total of 290 women; 214 premenopausal and 76 postmenopausal women, and 56 men) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study consecutively. The median duration of hypothyroidism and mean age of individuals were 4 years and 42.1 years, respectively. The duration of hypothyroidism ranged from 1 to 25 years, and age ranged from 18 years to 76 years. During the study, all individuals had their serum TSH in the target range (0.4–5 mIU/L) as per protocol, and the mean serum TSH was 2.56 mIU/L. The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the individuals enrolled are shown in [Table 1]. Group comparison was done using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as post hoc test.
|Table 1: The descriptive clinical and biochemical data of the enrolled individuals in both the genders separately|
Click here to view
The absolute LT4 daily dose (ADD) ranged from minimum of 25 μg to maximum of 200 μg with mean of 77.1 ± 30 μg. The dose at 25th percentile, 50th percentile, and 75th percentile was 50, 75, and 100 μg, respectively. The mean LT4 daily D/W was 1.21 ± 0.50 μg/kg and dose ranged from 0.3 to 2.82 μg/kg; dose at 25th percentile, 50th percentile, and 75th percentile was 0.84, 1.16, and 1.5 μg/kg, respectively. The mean daily LT4 daily D/IBW was 1.58 ± 0.63 μg/kg of IBW and dose ranged from 0.42 μg/kg to 3.5 μg/kg of IBW; dose at 25th percentile, 50th percentile, and 75th percentile was 1.13, 1.53, and 1.97 μg/kg, respectively.
The parameters of individuals were compared between men, premenopausal women, and postmenopausal women as shown in [Table 1]. There was no significant difference in mean ADD or D/W between men, postmenopausal women, and premenopausal women, although premenopausal women required significantly higher D/IBW compared to men. The ADD, D/W, and D/IBW at 25th percentile, 50th percentile, and 75th percentile for men, premenopausal women, and postmenopausal women are shown in [Table 2]. Among the anthropometric measures, weight correlated positively and significantly with ADD (r = 0.2, P< 0.001) and significantly and negatively with D/W (−0.36, P< 0.001), although no correlation was found with IBW. Similarly, height correlated significantly and positively with ADD (r = 0.17, P< 0.001) and significantly and negatively with D/IBW (−0.23, P = 0.001), although no correlation was found with D/W.
|Table 2: The percentile of age of individuals, doses of levothyroxine, and duration of hypothyroidism in both genders separately|
Click here to view
Age correlated significantly with D/W (r = −0.2, P< 0.001) but not with ADD or D/IBW. On comparing age quartiles for D/W, a significant difference was found between 1st quartile versus 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile. The mean D/W in 1st age quartile was 1.4 μg/kg, 2nd quartile was 1.15 μg/kg, 3rd quartile was 1.13 μg/kg, and 4th quartile was 1.13 μg/kg. The correlation of age with body mass index (BMI) was also statistically significant (r = 0.29, P< 0.001), suggesting a potential role of change in body composition affecting the correlation of age with D/W. The partial correlation of age with D/W showed a significant trend (P = 0.05) even after adjusted for BMI.
Duration of hypothyroidism correlated significantly with ADD (r = 0.2, P = 0.001), D/W (r = 0.2, P< 0.001), and D/IBW (r = 0.2, P < 0.001). Individuals were divided into 4 groups based on quartiles of duration of hypothyroidism. On comparing the mean D/W, D/IBW, or absolute LT4 daily dose between the groups based on duration of hypothyroidism, 1st quartile was significantly different from 3rd and 4th and between 2 and 4th for D/W.
There was a significant correlation between BMI and ADD (r = 0.12, P< 0.02), D/W (r = 0.13, P = 0.01), and D/IBW (r −0.38, P = 0.001). Individuals were divided into four groups based on BMI (Group 1 BMI <18.5 kg/m 2, Group 2 BMI 18.5–23 kg/m 2, Group 3 BMI >23–30 kg/m 2, and Group 4 >30 kg/m 2). On comparing the groups by repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni correction, no significant difference was found between the BMI groups in ADD and D/IBW, but a significant difference in D/W was found between BMI Groups 1 and 3, 1 and 4, 2 and 3, 2 and 4, and 3 and 4. The mean D/W was as follows: Group 1: 1.6 μg/kg, Group 2: 1.5 μg/kg, Group 3: 1.2 μg/kg, and Group 4: 1.0 μg/kg.
The correlation coefficient of D/W and D/IBW with independent variables is adjusted for covariates [Table 3]. In univariate regression model, gender, height, weight, IBW, and BMI were significant predictors for ADD. For D/W, age, duration of hypothyroidism, weight, and BMI were significant predictors, and gender, duration of hypothyroidism, height, IBW, and BMI were significant predictors for D/IBW by univariate regression model.
|Table 3: The partial correlation of exploratory variables after adjusting for covariates for levothyroxine daily doses|
Click here to view
The multivariate regression by linear regression model was used to find the determinants of ADD, D/W, and D/IBW, and the result is shown in [Table 4]. The residuals graph for three regression models are shown in [Figure 1].
|Table 4: Multivariate model predicting levothyroxine dose/kg body weight, age, duration of hypothyroidism, and body mass index as independent variables^|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: The P-P plot of regression standardized residuals. (a) Model for Levothyroxine dose based on daily dose, (b) model for absolute levothyroxine daily dose, and (c) model for levothyroxine daily dose based on ideal body weight|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
LT4 is given as a replacement therapy for hypothyroidism, and the dose depends on the demand which in turn dependent on endogenous thyroid hormone production. The level of thyroid hormones in the blood circulation is determined by the endogenous secretion of thyroid hormones, their metabolism, and exogenous replacement therapy. To maintain euthyroid range of serum TSH and T4, the replacement dose of LT4 is determined by the residual thyroid function. Conventionally, the recommended starting dose of LT4 in autoimmune hypothyroidism cases is 1.6 μg/kg D/W. Patients with minimal residual thyroid function due to autoimmune etiology require 1.6–1.8 μg/kg of actual body weight, although some studies suggest a higher dose of 2.0–2.1 μg/kg.,, The etiology of a patient's hypothyroidism affects the D/W and may reflect degree of residual function as suggested by higher D/W requirement in athyreotic patients posttotal thyroidectomy versus patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
This study showed age-related decline in D/W as shown by significant negative correlation between age and D/W, and significantly higher D/W requirement in individuals in 1st age quartile versus 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile, although no similar difference was for ADD and D/IBW. Devdhar et al. showed that age-based difference in LT4 dose is due to difference in body weight and gender, while study by Santini et al. showed a significant negative correlation (P< 0.03) of age with D/W which disappeared when adjusted for LBM  and hence suggested that the age-related decrease in LBM is responsible for decrease in LT4 dose. The findings of this study are similar to the above-mentioned studies that the significance of age for D/W decreased when adjusted for BMI, but a trend of significance was still seen although lean muscle mass was not analyzed in this study.
This study enrolled long-standing cases of spontaneous onset primary hypothyroidism for which Hashimoto's thyroiditis is the most common cause. At least 75% of cases in this study required dose ≤1.5 μg/kg of LT4 D/W that is lesser than recommended starting dose of 1.6 μg/kg of LT4. This finding can be explained by the variable residual thyroid function reserve. A study of long-term follow-up of adults with subclinical hypothyroidism for more than 9 years showed that on an average, 28% of patients progressed to overt hypothyroidism, while 68% patients remained in the subclinical state, suggesting a variable course in each patient. In the same study, it was shown that residual thyroid reserve and high titer of thyroid peroxidase antibody were significant predictors for development of overt hypothyroidism on follow-up. This study showed that duration of hypothyroidism was predictors of ADD, D/W, and D/IBW. In addition, individuals in the lowest quartile of duration of hypothyroidism (1–2.3 years) had significantly lower mean either ADD, D/W, or D/IBW compared to 3rd and 4th quartile, and 2nd quartile from 4th quartile. The findings of this study suggest progressive decrease in residual thyroid function and that not all cases have minimal residual thyroid function at the onset.
The gender-based significant difference in the mean ADD and D/IBW was seen in this study, although no gender difference was seen in mean D/W. The significantly higher D/IBW in premenopausal compared to male became insignificant when adjusted for height, suggesting that the difference in the gender-based difference in D/IBW is mainly due to difference in anthropometry. Similar gender-based difference was found in other studies.,
Although BMI was not significantly different between male and female, IBW was significantly higher in men compared to postmenopausal or premenopausal women due to greater height in men. D/W was similar between male and female, but D/IBW was lower in men compared to premenopausal or post- menopausal women. The lower D/IBW requirement in males, and almost similar dose requirement for D/W in both gender suggests that LT4 requirement of fat mass exists, although much lower than that of LBM.
Hence, this study suggests that the D/W or D/IBW requirement is variable and not one size and varies between individuals probably depending on the residual thyroid function reserve. Duration of hypothyroidism was a significant determinant of LT4 daily doses. This study has strengths such as large population size, confirmed compliance with medication, and recently confirmed euthyroidism, although it has many limitations as being cross-sectional, and functional reserve and LBM were not evaluated.
| Conclusion|| |
Primary autoimmune hypothyroidism patients require a variable dose of LT4, and the dose progressively increases with duration of hypothyroidism. Gender has no direct effect on LT4 dose, and the difference in dose is based on difference in anthropometry between both the genders.
We gratefully acknowledge Mrs. K Saroja for her assistance in data collection.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, et al.
Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: Prepared by the American Thyroid Association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid 2014;24:1670-751.
Santini F, Pinchera A, Marsili A, Ceccarini G, Castagna MG, Valeriano R, et al.
Lean body mass is a major determinant of levothyroxine dosage in the treatment of thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:124-7.
Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, et al.
Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: Cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract 2012;18:988-1028.
Díez JJ, Iglesias P. Spontaneous subclinical hypothyroidism in patients older than 55 years: An analysis of natural course and risk factors for the development of overt thyroid failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:4890-7.
Jaruratanasirikul S, Leethanaporn K, Khuntigij P, Sriplung H. The clinical course of Hashimoto's thryoiditis in children and adolescents: 6 years longitudinal follow-up. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2001;14:177-84.
Kabadi UM, Jackson T. Serum thyrotropin in primary hypothyroidism. A possible predictor of optimal daily levothyroxine dose in primary hypothyroidism. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1046-8.
Gordon MB, Gordon MS. Variations in adequate levothyroxine replacement therapy in patients with different causes of hypothyroidism. Endocr Pract 1999;5:233-8.
Burmeister LA, Goumaz MO, Mariash CN, Oppenheimer JH. Levothyroxine dose requirements for thyrotropin suppression in the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;75:344-50.
Devine BJ. Gentamicin therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1974;8:650-5.
Mandel SJ, Brent GA, Larsen PR. Levothyroxine therapy in patients with thyroid disease. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:492-502.
Rosenbaum RL, Barzel US. Levothyroxine replacement dose for primary hypothyroidism decreases with age. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:53-5.
Devdhar M, Drooger R, Pehlivanova M, Singh G, Jonklaas J. Levothyroxine replacement doses are affected by gender and weight, but not age. Thyroid 2011;21:821-7.
Jonklaas J. Sex and age differences in levothyroxine dosage requirement. Endocr Pract 2010;16:71-9.
Huber G, Staub JJ, Meier C, Mitrache C, Guglielmetti M, Huber P, et al.
Prospective study of the spontaneous course of subclinical hypothyroidism: Prognostic value of thyrotropin, thyroid reserve, and thyroid antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:3221-6.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]