Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 909 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 417-420

Incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in Western Rajasthan using cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone levels as a screening tool: A cross-sectional hospital-based study


Department of Pediatric Medicine, Pediatric Cardiac Division, Umaid Hospital for Mother and Child Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication16-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Jai Prakash Soni
Mahaveer Colony, Plot No. 4, Bhashkar Circle, Jodhpur - 342 001, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_354_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) is considered the most common preventable cause of intellectual impairment, with a worldwide annual incidence of 1:4000 live births. In the absence of screening program actual incidence in India is not exactly known, but in previous studies it varies from 1:500 to 1:3400. We wished to find out the incidence of CH in Western Rajasthan using cord blood TSH as a screening tool and venous TSH within 14 days of life as a confirmatory test. Methods: This cross sectional descriptive study was conducted over a period of six months in teaching hospitals attached to Medical College. Cord blood TSH value of 20 mIU/L or >20 mIU/L was taken as cut off for screening and all screen positive neonates were re-tested for serum TSH by taking venous samples within 14 days of life. Repeat TSH levels of 20mIU/L or more tested by Enzyme Linked Fluorescent Assay were considered confirmatory. Results: Total 9558 cord blood samples were analyzed for TSH levels, out of which 533 came out to be screen positive (recall rate 5.57%). Out of these 58 could not be confirmed, so were excluded from the further analysis. Effective sample size and screen positive cases dropped to 9500 and 475 respectively, and out of these 13 were confirmed as CH (incidence - 1.37 per thousand live births). Conclusions: Considering the previous studies, incidence of CH is much higher in Western Rajasthan than the anticipated. Overall in India CH seems to be more prevalent than the other parts of the world, necessitating the need of national screening program.

Keywords: Congenital hypothyroidism, cord blood TSH, incidence


How to cite this article:
Chaudhary M, Soni JP, Goyal VK, Sharma P, Makwana M, Lora SS. Incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in Western Rajasthan using cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone levels as a screening tool: A cross-sectional hospital-based study. Indian J Endocr Metab 2018;22:417-20

How to cite this URL:
Chaudhary M, Soni JP, Goyal VK, Sharma P, Makwana M, Lora SS. Incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in Western Rajasthan using cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone levels as a screening tool: A cross-sectional hospital-based study. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 20];22:417-20. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2018/22/3/417/236785




   Introduction Top


Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) is considered as the most common preventable causes of intellectual impairment. It has a worldwide annual incidence of 1:4000 live births.[1],[2] In India, its incidence varies across the states. It is as high as 1:500 in Kochi (Southern India) and 1:1000 in Manipur (Eastern India) to as low as 1:3400 in Chandigarh (North India).[3],[4],[5]

Specific features of CH are mostly absent at birth which requires universal screening for early diagnosis and timely intervention.[6] Screening protocols have been well established in most of the developed countries in the last three decades. National screening program has been found to be cost-effective because of its profound clinical benefit.[7] Due to the limitation of resources, developing countries are still shying away from launching a national screening program.[8],[9],[10]

There are three types of screening methods; primary thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with backup T4 measurements, primary T4 with backup TSH measurements, and combined primary TSH and T4 measurements. Each one has its own merits and demerits. In most of the Europe and United States, primary TSH approach is followed. This test is optimally employed within 2–4 days of life to avoid false positive tests resulting from initial TSH surge.[10],[11]

This delayed approach (after 48 h of life) will miss a lot of cases in developing countries such as India. Here, most of the normal vaginally delivered mothers are discharged within 48 h of childbirth and some of them never come for follow-up. Moreover, a lot of parents would not allow taking blood sample of their seemingly healthy baby. Recently, cord blood TSH level has shown a good correlation with the heel prick TSH levels obtained between 4th and 7th day of life.[12]

This study was planned to find out the incidence of CH in Western Rajasthan, using cord blood TSH level as a screening test. It was followed by venous TSH within 14 days of life as a confirmatory test.


   Materials and Methods Top


This cross-sectional observational study was conducted over a period of 6 months after the approval from Institutional Ethics Committee. All newborns delivered in the hospitals attached to our institute were included in the study.

Neonates with major congenital malformations and whose mother's receiving antithyroid drugs were excluded from the study. Informed written consent was obtained from the parents regarding collection of cord blood before delivery. Umbilical cord was clamped using three clamp techniques: one close to the baby and two near placental end after cessation of pulsations. A 10 ml of blood was collected in a sterile plain vial from the cord between abdominal end and placental end by removing the clamp of placental end. Blood was transported to the laboratory within 24 h of collection for analysis of TSH level. Weight, gestational age, mode of delivery, and sex of all the included babies were noted at the time of birth.

TSH level was measured using enzyme-linked fluorescent assay method. The machine used for TSH analysis was VIDAS manufactured by bioMerieux. This assay combines one-step enzyme immunoassay sandwich method with a final fluorescent detection. The solid-phase receptacle (SPR) serves as the solid phase as well as the pipetting device for the assay. Reagents for the assay are ready-to-use and predispensed in the sealed reagent strips. All of the assay steps are performed automatically by the instrument. The antigen binds to antibodies coated on the SPR and to the conjugate forming a “sandwich.” Unbound components are eliminated during the washing. During the final detection step, fluorescence of substrate is analyzed. The intensity of the fluorescence is proportional to the concentration of antigen present in the sample. Results were calculated automatically by the instrument in relation to the calibration curve stored in memory (4-parameter logistic model) and were expressed in mIU/L.

Cord blood TSH value of 20mIU/L or more was taken as cutoff for screening. All screen positive neonates were retested for serum TSH by taking venous samples within 14 days of life. Repeat TSH level ≥ 20 mIU/L was considered confirmatory for CH. Levothyroxine was started at a dose of 10–15 mcg/kg/day in these newborns.

Keeping the maximum prevalence of 0.2% (as reported in Kochi), 95% confidence interval, and 0.01 precision errors, the sample size was calculated to be 6147. The data obtained were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010 with the help of SPSS (version 20.0). Continuous data were summarized as mean ± standard deviation and categorical data as proportion. These data were finally analyzed using Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively.


   Results Top


During this period, a total of 11355 samples were subjected to cord TSH levels. Out of them, 1797 samples got hemolyzed. After excluding them, the study cohort comprised 9558 neonates. Out of which, 4983 (52.10%) were males and 4575 (47.90%) were females. Four thousand eight hundred and ninety newborns (51.15%) were term followed by 3362 preterms (35.174%) and 1306 postterms (13.66%). Among the preterm group, 30.56% were late preterms. Most of the neonates (93.25%) weighed between 2 and 4 kg (48.05% in 2–3 kg and 45.21% in 3–4 kg group). The 4.94% and 1.77% neonates were <2 kg and more than 4kg, respectively. Percentage of lower segment caesarean section delivered babies was slightly higher than that of vaginally delivered (56.73% vs. 43.265%). Mean TSH level of the study cohort was 7.8 ± 5.235 mIU/L.

Out of total 533 screen positive newborns, 58 lost to follow-up or expired. Out of 475 newborns retested, 13 had confirmed hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was calculated as 1.37 per 1000 live births (13/9500) with a recall rate of 5.57% (533/9558). Birth weight and gestational age were higher in screen positive group in comparison to screen negative, P < 0.0001 [Table 1]. No correlation was noted between very high cord TSH levels and true hypothyroidism. None of the babies with cord TSH levels >40 mIU/L had serum TSH level >20 mIU/L on retesting. It implies the effect of perinatal stress on cord blood TSH levels [Table 2].
Table 1: Comparison between screen positive and negative population

Click here to view
Table 2: Relation between true hypothyroidism and cord TSH levels

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The present study area belongs to a desert state located in Western Rajasthan, India. Here, the incidence of CH was found to be 1.37 per 1000 live births, with a recall rate of 5.57%. Male:female ratio of confirmed cases was 1.6:1. None of the babies with cord TSH levels >50 mIU/L had true hypothyroidism.

The major strength of our study was large and adequate sample size. There were certain limitations such as no follow-up of the patients with confirmed CH; hence, a difference between transient or permanent CH could not be made. Furthermore, the etiological differentiation of the confirmed cases was not made. Finally, we used primary TSH approach which can miss the newborns with primary hypothyroidism. However, this entity in itself is very rare (1:60,000).[10] Not only this but previously also cord TSH has been found to be better than the cord T4.[13]

There is no universally accepted cutoff of cord TSH level for screening. In Thailand, initially 30 mIU/L was used which was later modified to 40 mIU/L to decrease the recall rate from 1.1% to 0.67%.[14] If we used these cutoffs, our recall rate would decreased to 2.8% and 0.9%, respectively. However then, we would have missed 69.23% (9/13) and 100% (13/13) true cases, respectively. The lower threshold of 20 mIU/L may also miss the true hypothyroid case rarely. Balancing the false positivity and risk of missing true cases, 20 mIU/L is considered the optimum cutoff for mass screening.[1]

Keeping cord TSH cutoff 20 mIU/L, our recall rate was much higher than reported by Manglik et al. (1.833% in Kolkata). However, their sample size was quiet small (1200) and they had included only term neonates.[15] In Iran, Ordookhani et al. took a larger sample of 20,107 neonates and found a recall rate of 1.3%. However, they used a different method (two-site immunoradiometric assay on air dried cord blood spot) for TSH measurement.[16] On the other hand, Sangeeta et al. and Gupta et al. reported a very high recall rate (9.4% and 11.45%, respectively). However again, their sample size was small (500 and 952, respectively) and inclusion criteria were different (term neonates only and hypothyroid mother also, respectively).[9],[17]

In most of the Indian studies, the incidence of CH varies between 1 and 2 per 1000 live births. Kaur et al. in Chandigarh reported exceptionally very low incidence of 0.29 per thousand live births. However, instead of TSH alone, they used T3, T4, and TSH to confirm CH.[5]

These Indian figures on the incidence of CH are much higher than the international data (1:3000–4000). In Iran also, the incidence of CH was found to be high (1:914). The reason cited for this high incidence was parental consanguinity and iodine excess.[16] Other factors can also influence the incidence of CH like laboratory method employed, cutoff used for screening, demographic, geographic, ethnic, and racial factors.[1]

Cost-benefit analysis

For cost-benefit analysis, we contacted a local laboratory. They were ready to do TSH levels at rate Rs. 40 per sample at mass level. If we calculate the hypothetical investment of our study, it comes out to be Rs. 4 Lakh for testing around 10,000 TSH samples. We prevented a total of 13 cases of intellectual impairment with each case costing

   Conclusion Top


The incidence of CH is much higher in India than reported in the world. Delayed diagnosis is increasing the prevalence of intellectual impairment. Cost-benefit analysis supports the feasibility of universal newborn screening program at national level.

Take home message

Newborn screening for CH if made compulsory in all centers has the potential to prevent approximately fifty cases of intellectual impairment daily in India.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Anand MR, Ramesh P, Nath D. Congenital hypothyroidism screening with umbilical cord blood: Retrospective analysis. Indian Pediatr 2015;52:435-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ogundele MO, Waterson M. When should we be conducting thyroid function tests in newborns and young infants? Arch Dis Child 2010;95:151-2.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sanghvi U, Diwakar KK. Universal newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr 2008;45:331-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Singh RA, Devi KG, Devi KL, Banik U. Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in Manipur by measurement of umbilical cord thyroid stimulating hormone: A hospital based study. J Med Soc 2013;27:127-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Kaur G, Srivastav J, Jain S, Chawla D, Chavan BS, Atwal R, et al. Preliminary report on neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: A Chandigarh experience. Indian J Pediatr 2010;77:969-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Anjum A, Afzal MF, Iqbal SM, Sultan MA, Hanif A. Congenital hypothyroidism in neonates. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014;18:213-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Desai MP. Congenital hypothyroidism: Screening dilemma. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012;16 Suppl 2:S153-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Dussault JH. The anecdotal history of screening for congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:4332-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sangeeta N, Kamala L, Karki P, Basar G, Kumar YA, Singh R, et al. Assessment of umbilical cord TSH in term neonates in Manipur. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2013;9:14-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism: Recommended guidelines. AAP Policy Statement. Pediatrics 1993;91:1203-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Rose SR; Section on Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Brown RS; Public Health Committee, Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, Foley T, et al. Update of newborn screening and therapy for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 2006;117:2290-303.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Seth A, Rashmi M, Bhakhri BK, Sekri T. Neonatal thyroid screening: Relationship between cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone levels and thyroid stimulating hormone in heel prick sample on 4th to 7th day-of-life. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014;18:125-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Walfish PG. Evaluation of three thyroid-function screening tests for detecting neonatal hypothyroidism. Lancet 1976;1:1208-10.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mahachoklertwattana P, Phuapradit W, Siripoonya P, Charoenpol O, Thuvasethakul P, Rajatanavin R. Five-year thyrotropin screening for congenital hypothyroidism in Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 1999;82 Suppl 1:S27-32.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Manglik AK, Chatterjee N, Ghosh G. Umbilical cord blood TSH levels in term neonates: A screening tool for congenital hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr 2005;42:1029-32.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ordookhani A, Mirmiran P, Najafi R, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Congenital hypothyroidism in Iran. Indian J Pediatr 2003;70:625-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gupta A, Srivastava S, Bhatnagar A. Cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone level – Interpretation in light of perinatal factors. Indian Pediatr 2014;51:32-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Abstract Introduction Materials and Me... Results Discussion Conclusion Article Tables
  In this article
 References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed319    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded61    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal