Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 434 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 572-573

Base rate, Occam's razor, and hypoglycemia


Department of Endocrinology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication31-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Shriraam Mahadevan
Department of Endocrinology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_119_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Balachandran K, Asirvatham AR, Mahadevan S. Base rate, Occam's razor, and hypoglycemia. Indian J Endocr Metab 2018;22:572-3

How to cite this URL:
Balachandran K, Asirvatham AR, Mahadevan S. Base rate, Occam's razor, and hypoglycemia. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 15];22:572-3. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2018/22/4/572/238106



Sir,

Recently, we encountered a patient with recurrent hypoglycemia. She was a middle-aged Punjabi woman, tall and hefty, who had presented elsewhere with seizure-like activity. The venous blood glucose during seizure was 40 mg/dl. On probing, the patient recounted several episodes of hypoglycemia for the last few months. Most of them occurred in the postprandial period, but a few were in the fasting state. The patient was diagnosed to have Sjogren's syndrome 2 years back. On examination, she had mild acanthosis nigricans. Her hemoglobin A1C was 6.1%.

Our initial differentials were autoimmune hypoglycemia and reactive hypoglycemia of prediabetes. Since hypoglycemia was recurrent, was severe, and happened in a patient with a known systemic autoimmune disease, we considered autoimmune hypoglycemia as the chief possibility. We subjected the patient to a standard 72-h supervised fast. The patient did not develop hypoglycemia during the first 48 h. Even more puzzling was the absence of ketonuria even after 48 h of fasting. Since this finding defied basic biochemistry, we reconfirmed the absence of surreptitious calorie intake.

As the supervised fast did not allow us to exclude endogenous hyperinsulinism, we did an extended glucose tolerance test with 100 g of glucose. Four hours after ingesting glucose, the patient developed hypoglycemia. The critical sample showed endogenous hyperinsulinism and absence of anti-insulin antibodies. Thus, we made the diagnosis of prediabetes leading to reactive hypoglycemia. The insulin resistance and the resultant “endogenous hyperinsulinism” perhaps explain the lack of ketonuria during fasting.

In the evaluation of hypoglycemia, the order of testing-supervised fast versus meal challenge is not emphasized.[1] Of the causes of postprandial hypoglycemia, reactive hypoglycemia is most common because of the sheer number of prediabetes patients. In our attempt to abide by the dictum of Occam's razor in medicine – of eschewing a double diagnosis when one would suffice (autoimmunity and reactive hypoglycemia vs. autoimmunity alone), we committed the fallacy of base rate neglect.

We ignored prior probabilities (of reactive hypoglycemia) when confronted with specific details about the patient (with a systemic autoimmune disease). As Tversky and Kahneman show in their seminal paper,[2] this bias is common and has profound implications for medicine – common problems are more common even in patients with rare diseases. As an extension, a test that teases out the more common problem should be done first. Thus, in obese patients with hypoglycemia, it is preferable to do an extended glucose tolerance test first before the 72 h fast. This also has several practical advantages: glucose tolerance test is easier to do, does not require admission, and is well “tolerated” by the patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Galati SJ, Rayfield EJ. Approach to the patient with postprandial hypoglycemia. Endocr Pract 2014;20:331-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185:1124-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
 References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed326    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal