|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 312-317
Therapeutic experience of saxagliptin as first add-on after metformin in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: A non-interventional, prospective, observational study (ONTARGET-INDIA)
Sanjay Kalra1, Sarita Bajaj2, AG Unnikrishnan3, Manash P Baruah4, Rakesh Sahay5, V Hardik6, Amit Kumar6
1 Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Research Institute of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Karnal, Haryana, India
2 Department of Medicine, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Clinical Diabetology and Endocrinology, Chellaram Diabetes Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
4 Department of Endocrinology, Excel Center, Maya Ville, Barthakur Mill Road, Ulubari, Guwahati, Assam, India
5 Department of Endocrinology, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
6 Department of Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||30-Jul-2019|
Departments of Endocrinologist, Bharti Research Institute of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Karnal - 132 001, Haryana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are widely used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients but the data available in existing clinical trial programmes on DPP4 inhibitors include limited number of patients from India. Hence, this study attempted to understand usage, efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as first add-on after metformin in Indians with T2DM. Methodology: It was a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional and observational study planned to enrol T2DM patients who were inadequately controlled with metformin alone and had been recently (i.e., within past 15 days) prescribed saxagliptin as an add-on to metformin. Type 1 diabetes mellitus, use of glucose lowering drugs apart from metformin or saxagliptin, pregnancy, lactation, and medical condition, which could interfere with safe completion of the study were excluded. Results: A total of 1109 participants (658 men and 451 women) with mean ± SD age of 51.17 ± 11.85 years were enrolled from 50 centres throughout India. Significant reduction was observed in mean ± SD change of HbA1c as − 0.86% ± 1.76 from baseline to after 3 months of therapy (P < 0.0001). The quality of life assessed by World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire was reported to be “good” or “neither good nor bad” by majority of the participants at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. A total of 15 adverse events (AEs) were reported in the study, however, no serious adverse event (SAE) occurred during the study. All AEs were of mild intensity and did not require any intervention. Conclusion: Overall, saxagliptin in combination with metformin was generally well-tolerated in Indian T2DM patients and new or unexpected safety events were not identified. This study is also registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02588859).
Keywords: DPP4 inhibitors, Saxagliptin, type 2 diabetes mellitus
|How to cite this article:|
Kalra S, Bajaj S, Unnikrishnan A G, Baruah MP, Sahay R, Hardik V, Kumar A. Therapeutic experience of saxagliptin as first add-on after metformin in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: A non-interventional, prospective, observational study (ONTARGET-INDIA). Indian J Endocr Metab 2019;23:312-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Kalra S, Bajaj S, Unnikrishnan A G, Baruah MP, Sahay R, Hardik V, Kumar A. Therapeutic experience of saxagliptin as first add-on after metformin in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: A non-interventional, prospective, observational study (ONTARGET-INDIA). Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 6];23:312-7. Available from: http://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2019/23/3/312/263690
| Introduction|| |
Diabetes is a heterogeneous condition characterised by hyperglycaemia, a result of inadequacies in insulin secretion, insulin resistance/action or combination of both of these factors. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is the major cause of diabetes worldwide and accounts for nearly 90%–95% of those with diabetes and in severe cases may lead to death of the patients., T2DM patients have a wide range of pathophysiological factors governing the disease like insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency. Apart from providing useful effects in T2DM patients, the established oral hypoglycaemic agents have various concerns and challenges. Among these, major issues are weight gain, severe and prolonged hypoglycaemia, usage in special population (hepatic or renal insufficiency) and multitude of adverse events (AEs)., To deal with these inconsistencies, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors were developed to achieve glycaemic control while reducing the body weight and systolic blood pressure in parallel. The feedback loop comprising insulin-sensitive tissues and beta-cells regulate the normal glucose regulation. If we focus on the action of “incretins”, that is, Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) on pancreatic islet, research suggests that GLP-1 primarily influence both alpha and beta cells to augment insulin along with a halt on glucagon secretions., This useful action is subdued by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) enzyme within minutes. Hence, research was carried out to develop a new class of drugs with a goal in mind to manage T2DM effectively and to avoid hypoglycaemia associated with other oral antidiabetic agents. This lead to the advent of DPP4 inhibitors, which are efficacious and have very less incidence of hypoglycaemia, resulting in their successful marketing., Improvement in glycaemic control with combination of saxagliptin and metformin is established for better tolerance without the incidence of weight gain., Moreover, this combination poses improvement in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) apart from its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.,,
Metformin is used as first line oral antidiabetic drug in most of the cases. Sulfonylureas (SU) are used as frequent first add-on after metformin inadequacy. SUs are preferred because of good efficacy and faster reduction in glycaemic parameters. However, SU are associated with frequent hypoglycaemic episodes and weight gain which can adversely impact the overall outcome in T2DM. These limitations can be overcome by using candidates from a newer class of incretins, that is, DPP4 inhibitors. Early usage of DPP4 inhibitors has shown to control hyperglycaemia along with favourable effects on overall diabetes., There are also some animal studies showing beta cell preservation with incretin-based therapies., American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) Diabetes Management Algorithm 2017 suggested DPP4 inhibitors as an alternative for use as first-line monotherapy and in combination therapy (both dual and triple therapies) for better glycaemic control. The DPP4 inhibitors monotherapy has been shown to reduce the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels by around 1%. Sitagliptin was the first DPP4 inhibitor approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) in 2006 as monotherapy or in combination with metformin or thiazolidinedione in the treatment of T2DM. Saxagliptin is a modern addition approved by US-FDA in July 2009 to this class as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycaemic control in adults with T2DM.
A review article reported the results of 14 trials published from January 2008 to June 2015. The inclusion criteria for the selection of these 14 studies were “saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg/day dosage randomised phase III and IV trials with duration of study ≥24 weeks”. These studies involved 7889 participants throughout the world. These multicentre trials were conducted in United States, Australia, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Taiwan, India, Russian Federation, China, Republic of Korea, Philippines, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, Belgium, France, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, Peru, South Africa, Israel, Singapore, Finland, Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Romania. The results of these studies concluded that saxagliptin significantly improve the glycaemia with low risk of incidence of hypoglycaemia and neutral effects on weight.
Phase III research studies have demonstrated that saxagliptin is efficacious and well tolerated as an add-on therapy in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy., Short-term treatment with saxagliptin 5 mg added to metformin XR 1500 mg once daily was generally well tolerated in patients with T2DM who had inadequate glycaemic control with metformin monotherapy. Saxagliptin plus metformin was found to significantly reduce mean weighted glucose, postprandial glucose and fast plasma glucose with lesser adverse effects.
In India, DPP4 inhibitors were introduced in early 2007 but they were not utilised to potential level., In modern era, the healthcare professionals aim to provide individualised therapy by focusing on efficacy, financial factors, side effects and several risk factors in patients for better outcome and ease of use. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of DPP4 inhibitors in combination with metformin as a second line therapy in comparison to metformin + SU for T2DM patients in many parts of world, provide them with edge., Aligning to all the above said points and effectiveness, DPP4 inhibitors have potential to be used in Indian settings.
The data available in existing clinical trial programmes on DPP4 inhibitors include limited number of patients from India. Key opinion leaders in diabetic segment of India have identified the need for study on Indian patients to observe the effect of Saxagliptin in real world settings. Hence, this study aimed at achieve following objectives: (a) to understand usage and effect of Saxagliptin as first add-on after metformin in Indian patients and; (b) to assess HbA1c reduction achieved as first add-on after metformin. Other objectives included assessing effect of baseline HbA1c on HbA1c reduction, incidence of hypoglycaemia, AEs during study duration, quality of life and baseline incidence of urinary tract infection and genital tract infection.
| Methodology|| |
This was a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional and observational study planned to enrol T2DM patients who were inadequately controlled with metformin alone and had been recently (i.e., within past 15 days) prescribed saxagliptin as an add-on to metformin. Patients taking glucose lowering drugs apart from metformin or saxagliptin, presenting with type 1 diabetes mellitus, pregnant or lactating women, and patients with medical condition which in the opinion of investigator could interfere with safe completion of the study were excluded. Investigator/designee collected the information as per the study schedule from the study participants. All the potential participants were consecutively screened before enrolment at baseline. Follow-up was planned three months later.
The primary variables in the study were demographic details, disease duration, medical and surgical histories including comorbidities, current medication, saxagliptin discontinuation, switching to other medications and change in HbA1c over the study duration. Other variables included baseline and follow-up HbA1c levels, details of hypoglycaemic episodes experienced by patient in last 1 month before enrolment and during the study, incidence of AEs, changes in WHO Quality of life-BREF questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and urinalysis.
The study was performed in accordance with Ethical principles that are consistent with the declaration of Helsinki, international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use – Good Clinical Practices and the applicable legislation on non-interventional studies. The informed consent was obtained from all participants before inclusion in the study.
All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
| Results|| |
The disposition of participants in this study is presented in [Table 1]. There was a total of 1109 participants (658 men and 451 women) enrolled from 50 centers throughout India. Subjects (Mean ± SD age 51.17 ± 11.85 years and body mass index 27.13 ± 4.32 kg/m2) of T2DM with inadequate glycemic control and receiving metformin monotherapy (minimum dose of 500 mg once daily) for at least 3 months, and to whom saxagliptin was prescribed (within last 15 days) in addition to metformin were enrolled in this study [Table 2].
Saxagliptin 5 mg was received by 997 (89.9%) patients and 2.5 mg by 64 (5.77%) participants. Majority of participants, 775 (69.9%) had received 500 mg of metformin followed by 495 (44.63%) of 1000 mg, 53 (4.78%) of 2000 mg, 39 (3.52%) of 850 mg, 38 (3.43%) of 750 mg, and 21 (1.89%) of 1500 mg. The other dosage of metformin, that is, 50, 250 and 2500 mg were received by less than 1.0% of patients. Majority of the participants [971 (99.39%)] continued saxagliptin and only 6 (0.61%) participants discontinued the treatment during 3 months of follow-up. A total of 967 (98.98%) did not switch over to any other oral antidiabetic treatment, while 10 (1.02%) patients switched over to other oral therapy.
The quality of life was assessed by WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. It assesses the individual's perceptions in the context of their culture and value systems, and their personal goals, standards and concerns and the participants were asked to respond to 26 items, which measured the following broad domains: Physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The quality of life was reported to be “good” (44.5%-49.8%) or “neither good nor bad” (39.7%-39.2%) by the patients at baseline and after 3 months of treatment, respectively.
Significant reduction was observed in mean ± SD change of HbA1c as − 0.86% ± 1.76 from baseline to after 3 months of events in participants (P < 0.0001) [Table 3]. Mild hypoglycemic events were observed in 26 (2.34%) patients during last month of treatment and 38 (3.89%) patients had hypoglycaemic events since last visit. In this study, proportion of patients who experienced genital tract infection at baseline were low [58 (5.23%)] as compared to those who experienced urinary tract infection [148 (13.35%)].
|Table 3: Mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to 3 months after the treatment|
Click here to view
A total of 15 AEs occurred during the study. These were hypoglycaemia (8), urinary tract infections (3), pyrexia (2) and insomnia and eczema (one each). All these events were of mild intensity and did not require any intervention. No serious adverse event (SAE) occurred during the study. All the AEs were of 15 (100%) mild intensity. Majority of AEs [12 (80.0%)] were not suspected to be related with study drug [Table 4]. Urinary tract and genital tract infection were observed in 148 (13.35%) and 58 (5.23%) patients, respectively, at baseline.
| Discussion|| |
This observational, multi-centre, prospective study attempted to assess/understand efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as first add-on after metformin therapy in Indian T2DM patients. The study enrolled persons with T2DM who were prescribed saxagliptin as first add-on after inadequate glycemic control with metformin monotherapy (minimum dose of 500 mg OD). Overall, add-on treatment with saxagliptin to T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control after metformin monotherapy led to clinically relevant improvements in HbA1c levels with fewer AEs of mild intensity.
This study observed significant mean ± SD reduction in HbA1c level (−0.86% ± 1.76) of T2DM patients with add-on treatment of saxagliptin in combination with metformin over a period of 3 months. This data is consistent with earlier report of saxagliptin in combination with metformin which showed additional − 0.52% decrease in HbA1c level in T2DM. Our results corroborate findings from previous studies which document that saxagliptin in combination with metformin leads to reduction of 0.74% in HbA1c level at week 52 from baseline in T2DM patients. Another study reported reduction in HbA1c level by 0.59% from baseline to 24 weeks in T2DM patients in saxagliptin + metformin group. However, a recent study in 60 T2DM patients observed greater mean ± SD decline of HbA1c level by 1.4% ± 0.1 compared to current and previously published literature., The differences between our results [Table 2] and [Table 3] and earlier studies [Table 5] might be influenced by different racial background of study populations, baseline HbA1c levels, BMI, type and dosage of background drugs and prescribed doses of the study drug. Among the DPP4 inhibitors, saxagliptin results in similar HbA1c reductions compared to other DPP4 inhibitors. A systematic review compared the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin 100 mg and saxagliptin 5 mg with placebo and other hypoglycaemic medications. Both drugs (sitagliptin and saxagliptin) reported a greater reduction in HbA1c compared to placebo. In an open label randomised, placebo controlled, five-period crossover study enrolled 22 T2DM patients. The patients received saxagliptin 5 mg q.d., sitagliptin 100 mg q.d., vildagliptin 50 mg q.d., vildagliptin 50 mg b.i.d., or placebo for 5 days. The study published that a greater DPP4 inhibition was achieved with once daily treatment of sitagliptin in comparison to saxagliptin or vildagliptin.
The DDP4 inhibitors reported to have lower incidence of hypoglycaemia and thus better acceptability among diabetic patients. During 3 months of our study, hypoglycaemia was observed in 38/977 (3.89%) patients receiving saxagliptin in combination with metformin. The result is in assertion with a study in which hypoglycaemia occurred in 15 out of 428 (3.5%) T2DM patients being evaluated for 104 weeks. However, a 24 weeks randomised controlled trial reported very less incidence of hypoglycaemic event in 1.4% patients treated with saxagliptin in combination with metformin. In another 24-week study conducted in 207 T2DM patients, the incidence of hypoglycaemia was 6%, 3%, and 2% in saxagliptin, sitagliptin and vildaglitin arm, respectively. An analysis of 32 studies demonstrated the event of hypoglycaemia to be similar among sitagliptin, sexagliptin and placebo arms.
Saxagliptin in combination with metformin was well tolerated in this study and no increase in incidence of AEs was observed. Our study observed a low incidence of urinary tract infection in three (0.27%) patients, compared to a previous study that reported much higher incidence of urinary tract infection in 23 (5.7%) T2DM participants treated with saxagliptin and metformin. None of the participant in our study was discontinued as the result of an AE. However, previously published studies reported a discontinuation of 4.2%–4.4% from the study as a result of AEs of combination therapy with saxagliptin.,
| Conclusion|| |
Saxagliptin as add on first after metformin is associated with reduction in HbA1c levels as well as to lowers the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by metformin alone. Overall, saxagliptin in combination with metformin was generally well tolerated in this patient population and no new or unexpected safety events were identified.
Clinical Trials Registration
Compliance with ethics
Ethical approval and patient consent were received for this study.
The authors would like to thank Tech-Observer India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, the Contract Research Organization for supervising the study and providing administrative and medical writing support.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study is funded by AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd.
Conflicts of interest
Hardik V and Amit Kumar are employees of AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd. Other Authors – No conflict of Interest.
| References|| |
Karalliedde J, Gnudi L. Diabetes mellitus, a complex and heterogeneous disease, and the role of insulin resistance as a determinant of diabetic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31:206-13.
Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2014;37(Suppl 1):S81-S90.
Chawla A, Chawla R, Jaggi S. Microvasular and macrovascular complications in diabetes mellitus: Distinct or continuum? Indian J Endocr Metab 2016;20:546-51.
] [Full text]
Sena CM, Bento CF, Pereira P, Seiça R. Diabetes mellitus: New challenges and innovative therapies. EPMA J 2010;1:138-63.
Chaudhury A, Duvoor C, Reddy Dendi VS, Kraleti S, Chada A, Ravilla R, et al
. Clinical review of antidiabetic drugs: Implications for type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017;8:6.
Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del Prato S. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: Perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet 2014;383:1068-83.
Drucker DJ. The biology of incretin hormones. Cell Metab 2006;3:153-65.
Singh AK. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: Novel mechanism of actions. Indian J Endocr Metab 2014;18:753.
] [Full text]
Tan XY, Lu Y, Xuan LP, Huang YM, Hu JB. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin and metformin as initial combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016;9:18816-23.
Thomas MC, Paldánius PM, Ayyagari R, Ong SH, Groop P-H. Systematic literature review of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment. Diabetes Ther 2016;7:439-54.
Yu H, Woo VC. Emerging use of combination therapies for the management of type 2 diabetes–Focus on saxagliptin and dapagliflozin. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2017;10:317.
Liu H, Hu Y, Li F-F, Liu B-L, Su X-F, Ma J-H. Blood glucagon levels predict the hemoglobin A1c response to saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. Diabetes Ther 2016;7:743-53.
Bergenheim K, Williams SA, Bergeson JG, Stern L, Sriprasert M. US cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Pharm Benefits 2012;4:20-8.
Juarez-Garcia A, Casalvolone D, Qatami L, Bergenheim K, Donato B. PDB53 cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin (Onglyza®) in type 2 diabetes in South Africa. Value Health 2012;15:A180.
Gu S, Zeng Y, Yu D, Hu X, Dong H. Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin versus acarbose as second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes in China. PLoS One 2016;11:e0167190.
Rojas LB, Gomes MB. Metformin: An old but still the best treatment for type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2013;5:6.
Lund A, Knop FK. Worry vs. knowledge about treatment-associated hypoglycaemia and weight gain in type 2 diabetic patients on metformin and/or sulphonylurea. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:731-6.
Cefalu WT. The physiologic role of incretin hormones: Clinical applications. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2010;110(3 Suppl 2):S8-14.
Nauck M, Meininger G, Sheng Do, Terranella L, Stein PP. Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, compared with the sulfonylurea, glipizide, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007;9:194-205.
Xu G, Stoffers DA, Habener JF, Bonner-Weir S. Exendin-4 stimulates both beta-cell replication and neogenesis, resulting in increased beta-cell mass and improved glucose tolerance in diabetic rats. Diabetes 1999;48:2270-6.
Tourrel C, Bailbe D, Lacorne M, Meile MJ, Kergoat M, Portha B. Persistent improvement of type 2 diabetes in the Goto-Kakizaki rat model by expansion of the beta-cell mass during the prediabetic period with glucagon-like peptide-1 or exendin-4. Diabetes 2002;51:1443-52.
Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, et al
. Consensus statement by the American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract 2017;23:207-38.
Choe EY, Cho Y, Choi Y, Yun Y, Wang HJ, Kwon O, et al
. The effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab J 2014;38:211-9.
Dave DJ. Saxagliptin: A dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2:230-5.
Hollander PA, Kushner P. Type 2 diabetes comorbidities and treatment challenges: Rationale for DPP-4 inhibitors. Postgrad Med 2010;122:71-80.
Jain R. Utility of saxagliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Review of efficacy and safety. Adv Ther 2015;32:1065-84.
Derosa G, Maffioli P. Patient considerations and clinical utility of a fixed dose combination of saxagliptin/metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2011;4:263-71.
Derosa G, Maffioli P. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: 3 years of experience. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:350-64.
Neutel JM, Zhao C, Karyekar CS. Adding saxagliptin to metformin extended release (XR) or uptitration of metformin XR: Efficacy on daily glucose measures. Diabetes Ther 2013;4:269-83.
Seshadri K, Kirubha M. Gliptins: A new class of oral antidiabetic agents. Indian J Pharm Sci 2009;71:608.
] [Full text]
de Souza Cazarim M, da Cruz-Cazarim ELC, de Oliveira Baldoni A, dos Santos TB, de Souza PG, de Almeida Silva I, et al
. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitor drugs for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2017;11:S859-65.
Kwon CS, Seoane-Vazquez E, Rodriguez-Monguio R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin+dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared to metformin+sulfonylureas for treatment of type 2 diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:78.
Scheen AJ, Charpentier G, Ostgren CJ, Hellqvist A, Gause-Nilsson I. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with metformin compared with sitagliptin in combination with metformin in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010;26:540-9.
Goke B, Gallwitz B, Eriksson J, Hellqvist A, Gause-Nilsson I. Saxagliptin is non-inferior to glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone: A 52-week randomised controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract 2010;64:1619-31.
Rosenstock J, Hansen L, Zee P, Li Y, Cook W, Hirshberg B, et al
. Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: A randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin. Diabetes Care 2015;38:376-83.
Gerrald KR, Van Scoyoc E, Wines RC, Runge T, Jonas DE. Saxagliptin and sitagliptin in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2012;14:481-92.
Tatosian DA, Guo Y, Schaeffer AK, Gaibu N, Popa S, Stoch A, et al
. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with saxagliptin, sitagliptin, or vildagliptin. Diabetes Ther 2013;4:431-42.
Mintz ML, Minervini G. Saxagliptin versus glipizide as add-on therapy to metformin: Assessment of hypoglycemia. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30:761-70.
Yang W, Pan CY, Tou C, Zhao J, Gause-Nilsson I. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin added to metformin in Asian people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94:217-24.
Li CJ, Liu XJ, Bai L, Yu Q, Zhang QM, Yu P. Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin, saxagliptin or sitagliptin as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with dual combination of traditional oral hypoglycemic agents. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2014;6:69.
Moses RG, Kalra S, Brook D, Sockler J, Monyak J, Visvanathan J, et al
. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin plus a sulphonylurea. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:443-50.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]