Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 498 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 
Table of Contents
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 706-712

Nuclear medicine imaging in the evaluation of endocrine hypertension


Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication6-Sep-2012

Correspondence Address:
Rakesh Kumar
E-81, Ansari Nagar (East), AIIMS Campus, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.100655

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Endocrine hypertension forms a small (< 5%) but curable subset of patients with hypertension. Common endocrine causes of hypertension include pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome, primary hyperaldosteronism, and thyroid disorders. Nuclear medicine imaging plays an important role in evaluation of patients with endocrine hypertension. It has established role in patients of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, Cushing's syndrome, aldosteronism, and thyroid disorders. We present a brief overview of role of nuclear medicine imaging in endocrine hypertension. Development of newer radiotracers might further broaden the role of nuclear medicine in these patients.

Keywords: Endocrine hypertension, imaging, nuclear medicine, pheochromocytoma


How to cite this article:
Sharma P, Kumar R. Nuclear medicine imaging in the evaluation of endocrine hypertension. Indian J Endocr Metab 2012;16:706-12

How to cite this URL:
Sharma P, Kumar R. Nuclear medicine imaging in the evaluation of endocrine hypertension. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Nov 30];16:706-12. Available from: https://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2012/16/5/706/100655


   Introduction Top


Hypertension is the commonest cardiovascular disorder affecting about 20% adult populations worldwide. The prevalence of hypertension in India is reported as ranging from 10 to 30.9%. It is important because it markedly increases the risk of stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction (heart attack), and renal failure. In more than 95% of patients, no underlying cause can be determined, known as essential hypertension. Essential hypertension is currently considered an incurable disorder that requires life-long medical management. A small fraction (< 5%) of patients with hypertension have diagnosable causes known as secondary hypertension. The clinical importance of identifying cases of secondary hypertension is obvious, however. Unlike essential hypertension successful treatment of the underlying cause may provide a cure for patients with secondary hypertension. Secondary forms of hypertension that are endocrine in origin differ most notably from essential hypertension in that an etiology can be identified, onset is often abrupt, severity may be greater, a positive family history of hypertension is frequently missing, and there is no specific age criterion for occurrence. Specific symptoms may help guide the diagnostic evaluation. Secondary forms of endocrine hypertension can emerge in connection with such diverse endocrine disorders as primary hyperaldosteronism, Cushing's disease, or pheochromocytoma, among others.


   Pheochromocytoma Top


A pheochromocytoma is a tumor of neuroectodermal origin that produces excess quantities of catecholamines as well as numerous other physiologically active peptides. This overabundance of catecholamines causes blood pressure to increase, accompanied by a constellation of signs and symptoms that can imitate those seen with a diverse grouping of medical and surgical disorders. A pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of secondary hypertension, responsible for less than 1% of all cases of hypertension. Early recognition, precise localization, and attentive management of a benign pheochromocytoma in most instances lead to a complete cure. These tumors can prove life-threatening, particularly during surgical and obstetric procedures. [1] These points highlight the need for accurate preoperative localisation.

Conventional imaging

Computed tomography (CT) is usually first test done for evaluation of adrenal glands. Unenhanced CT is important to provide density measurements of lesions; it is usually followed by a, preferably delayed, contrast- enhanced study that can quantify the percentage of absolute or relative contrast enhancement washout and shows the vessels in the region of the adrenal glands. [2] This can assist in characterisation and distinguishing adenomas from other adrenal tumours with 98% sensitivity and 92% specificity. [3] However, it cannot differentiate between cortical and medullary tumors. Most sporadic adrenal pheochromocytoma are at least 2-3 cm in diameter and can be readily visualised with CT. Smaller (1-2 cm in diameter) pheochromocytoma are usually homogeneous in appearance, with a density of 40-50 HU on unenhanced CT. [4] Larger pheochromocytoma, however, can be inhomogeneous with areas of hemorrhage, and low attenuation necrosis may be present. [5] After contrast administration, pheochromocytomas enhance avidly and have a prolonged contrast washout phase. Pheochromocytomas have higher signal intensity than that of fat on T2-weighted sequences. This characteristic finding is due to the hypervascularity of the tumors. However, the specificities of both CT and MRI scans are disappointingly low (as low as 60%) in localizing pheochromocytoma particularly metastatic variants. [6] Patients that harbour adrenal masses, which are not adequately characterised with CT or MRI, can be further evaluated with functional nuclear medicine modalities. In many patients with pheochromocytoma, especially in those with extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma, adrenal pheochromocytoma larger than 5 cm, or mutations of genes encoding mainly subunits B and D of the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase [SDHB and SDHD], the possibility of metastatic disease or multiple tumors should be considered. For this, functional imaging modalities are most useful. These modalities are based on physiological and pathophysiological processes (cellular metabolism, tissue perfusion and local synthesis, uptake and storage of hormones and their receptors) and assist the preoperative staging of tumors. Furthermore, they can be of use in the evaluation of suspicious lesions and the identification of metastatic or recurrent tumors. Lesions detected by anatomical imaging can be specifically identified as pheochromocytoma by functional imaging agents that target the catecholamine synthesis, storage, and secretion pathways of chromaffin tumor cells. [7]

I-123/131 Metaiodobenzylguanidine

Similar to the sympathetic nervous system, pheochromocytoma and most extra-adrenal paragangliomas express cell membrane norepinephrine transporters (NET) through which catecholamine can enter cells to be stored in vesicle. Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) has been used for diagnostic imaging in pheochromocytoma because of its resemblance to norepinephrine and its good affinity and uptake by the NET. [8] Until recently the gold standard functional imaging method for pheochromocytoma was scintigraphy with I-131MIBG, with sensitivity of 77%-90% and excellent specificity of 95%-100%. [9] However, it is scintigraphy with another radionuclide, I-123 MIBG, which offers the option of performing single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and is reported to have sensitivity of 83%-100% and specificity of 95%-100% for detecting pheochromocytoma. [6],[10],[11] Scintigraphy imaging with I-123 MIBG, compared with I-131 MIBG, is advantageous because of its optimal δ-emissions and lack of ß-particles that result in a lower absorbed dose. [12] In addition, the I-123 isotope can be visualized with SPECT imaging, further increasing its diagnostic accuracy. Importantly, the normal adrenal medullary may show physiological uptake of both I-131and I-123 MIBG. [13],[14] Unfortunately availability of I-123 MIBG, compared to I-131 MIBG, is limited and it is not available in India and many other countries. Suboptimal sensitivity of MIBG scintigraphy might be associated with the relatively low affinity of MIBG to the NET, the lack of storage granules or the loss of transporters by tumor cell de-differentiation. [15] Furthermore, medication use interfering with MIBG uptake in patients could result in false-negative results. [16] SPECT with I-123MIBG improves the identification of lesions in case of lesions with limited uptake or those with central necrosis. Recent use of SPECT-CT in such patients has shown further improved its utility with accurate anatomical localisation. [17] In a recent study by Fukuoka et al. showed that SPECT-CT detected additional lesions in 81% patients for I-123MIBG and 53% patients for I-131MIBG when compared to planar scintigraphy. [18] The experience at our centre is similar, with I-131 MIBG SPECT-CT providing advantage over planar scintigraphy for small lesions, lesions with necrosis and extra-adrenal lesions [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Images of a 42-year-old male patient with presenting with hypertension. Anterior (a) and posterior (b) planar MIBG images show focal area of tracer uptake in left suprarenal region (arrow). CT (c) images show a left suprarenal mass which show MIBG uptake in SPECT (d) and SPECT-CT (e) images (arrow). A diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was made which was confirmed on histopathology. In this patient SPECT and SPECT-CT provided no added advantage over planar images

Click here to view
Figure 2: Images of a 30-year-old male patient presented with hypertension. Anterior (a) and posterior (b) planar MIBG images were essentially normal. CT (c) images show a large left suprarenal mass with areas of necrosis (arrow). SPECT (d) and SPECT-CT (e) images show MIBG uptake in the peripheral parts of the tumor with no uptake in central necrotic part (arrow). Also noted is normal physiological tracer uptake in right suprarenal gland (arrow). A diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was made which was confirmed on histopathology. In this patient SPECT and SPECT-CT provided significant advantage over planar images

Click here to view


Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

Somatostatin receptor imaging might be considered as a supplement for MIBG scintigraphy in pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas patients with suspected metastatic disease. [12] From in vitro and in vivo studies, it has been established that somatostatin receptor subtypes 3 and 4 are expressed in pheochromocytoma, including adrenal and metastatic disease. [19] In-111pentetreotide (Octreoscan; Mallinckrodt Inc.) has only moderate affinity for these subtypes, compared with subtypes 2 and 5, Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been used with variable results to detect this tumor. [20],[21] It has higher sensitivity for detecting metastatic pheochromocytoma than for detecting benign pheochromocytoma. [22] Newer somatostatin analogues like 1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraacetic acid -Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC) have shown favourable characteristics in imaging with high affinity for somatostatin receptors and a stable and easy process of labelling. [23] Although most existing somatostatin-based tracers only have affinity for the somatostatin receptor subtype 2, which is not always present on pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma cells, newer compounds, such as 1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraacetic acid-1-NaI 3 -Octreotide (DOTANOC), also have affinity for other somatostatin receptor subtypes. [24] Kroiss et al. compared Ga-68 DOTANOC spositron emission tomography (PET)-CT with I-123MIBG scintigraphy in patients with pheochromocytoma. [25] In pheochromocytoma patients, on a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity of Ga-68DOTA-TOC was 91.7% and that of I-123MIBG was 63.3%. Our experience is similar, with Ga-68 DOTANOC/TOC being better than I-131 MIBG for detecting extra adrenal pheochromocytoma, smaller lesions and lesions with central necrosis [Figure 3].
Figure 3: A 28-year-old male with MEN 2 syndrome. CT (a) images reveal bilateral large adrenal masses with necrotic centre (bold arrows). 68Ga-DOTANOC PET (b) and PET-CT (c) images show intense tracer uptake in peripheral part of the masses, with no uptake in central necrotic part. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) image show bilateral adrenal masses (arrows). The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was made and confirmed with histopathology. Note should be made of other foci of uptake in bones (arrows) due to uptake of the tracer in bone metastasis from medullary carcinoma of thyroid

Click here to view


F-18 Flurodopa and F-18 Flurodopamine PET-CT

Advantages of PET, compared with other functional imaging modalities, include the means of immediate whole-body imaging, the possibility of quantitative assessment of uptake, and the absence of artifacts from scar tissue or from the presence of metallic clips after surgery. [26] Although PET with F-18 Flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been used with some success for imaging metastatic pheochromocytoma, it is nevertheless a non-specific ligand that shows uptake in various tumors. [27] Moreover, because of low metabolic activity of pheochromocytomas FDG uptake in these tumors is usually low. F-18 labeled dihydroxyphenylalanine (FDOPA) has enabled PET imaging of benign pheochromocytoma. [28] FDOPA enters the cell via the amino acid transporter based on the capability of pheochromocytomas and other neuroendocrine tumors to take up, decarboxylate, and store amino acids and their biogenic amines. [16] Recent studies confirmed the usefulness of this technique in benign and malignant pheochromocytomas. [29] It has been found to be superior to both I-123/131 MIBG and FDG for these tumors. [30],[31] In a study by Eisenhofer et al. [32] it was found that in patients with metastatic disease, a per-lesion-based analysis showed a limited overall sensitivity of FDOPA PET: less than half of the metastases detected by CT/MRI were detected by FDOPA PET. On the other hand, in 71% of patients with malignant pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, one or more metastases were discerned by the technique. Moreover, a subgroup analysis indicated that its sensitivity is excellent for non-SDHB metastases (94%) but poor for SDHB-related metastases (20%). For non-metastatic pheochromocytoma FDOPA performed similar to I-123 MIBG. Another tracer for imaging pheochromocytoma is F-18 Flurodoapanmine. [33] Flurodopamine (FDA) PET is clearly superior to I-131 MIBG with sensitivities of 100% and 56%, respectively. In the study by Henri et al. [34] FDA PET showed high sensitivity, for both primary tumors and metastases (76% and 77%, respectively). They concluded that FDA PET was superior to FDOPA PET and I-123 MIBG scintigraphy for localizing metastases. In fact, the number of lesions detected by FDA PET far exceeded the number of lesions on CT and MRI and other functional imaging modalities. We at our centre have found FDOPA PET-CT to be better than I-131 MIBG for imaging pheochromocytoma and especially extra-adrenal lesions.


   Cushing's Syndrome Top


Hypercortisolemia is associated with hypertension in approximately 80% of adult cases and half of children. In patients with Cushing's disease, night-time blood pressure decline is significantly lower than that in patients with essential hypertension. In adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) dependent states, most typically an ACTH-secreting adenoma (also known as Cushing's disease), the excess of cortisol originates from direct adrenal stimulation. This represents about 80% of the ACTH-dependent causes of Cushing's disease. Non pituitary ectopic source of ACTH like small cell lung carcinoma, oat cell carcinoma, and carcinoid of bronchus and thymus is responsible for rest of cases. Most ACTH-independent cases of Cushing's disease result from an adrenal adenoma, carcinoma, or macronodular or micronodular hyperplasia. Despite the sharp anatomic detail of CT or MRI, evaluation with adrenal scintigraphy in conjunction with hormonal analysis is used not only in defining the function of adrenal lesions but also in the diagnosis and staging of malignant neoplasms of adrenal origin. [35]

NP-59 adrenal scintigraphy

Cholesterol analog, like I-131 6-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol (NP-59), are incorporated in low-density lipoproteins and accumulated by adrenocortical cells through a receptor-mediated process. [36] The availability of sensitive ACTH assays and the routine use of anatomic imaging techniques for detection of pituitary adenomas and other ACTH-secreting tumors have reduced the use of adrenal scintigraphy for the diagnosis of ACTH dependent Cushing syndrome. ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome can result from an adrenal adenoma, adrenal carcinoma, or bilateral nodular adrenal hyperplasia. The scintigraphic pattern of adrenal adenoma is unilateral visualization of the gland containing the adenoma; the contralateral gland is not visualized because it is hypofunctional and atrophic as the result of prolonged ACTH suppression by autonomous cortisol secretion from the adrenal adenoma. In adrenal carcinoma, there is nonvisualization of the adrenal glands bilaterally. These tumors do accumulate radiocholesterol but usually have insufficient tracer uptake for visualization on scintigraphy. However, tumoral glucocorticoid secretion is sufficient to cause hypercortisolism, suppress pituitary ACTH production, and radiocholesterol accumulation by the contralateral adrenal gland. [37] In the evaluation of patients with persistent cortisol excess after bilateral adrenalectomy for ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome, NP-59 scintigraphy has been used for identification of adrenal remnants and to guide surgical intervention.


   PET/PET-CT Top


The main utility of PET/PET-CT lies in localizing the site of ectopic ACTH production causing Cushing's syndrome. Conventional imaging modalities cannot localize the source of ACTH in 30-50% of patients with Cushing's syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion. FDG PET has been evaluated for this purpose. [38],[39] However, its role remains controversial. Pacak et al. [40] in their study, found FDG PET to be inferior to SRS with In-111petriotide for detecting ectopic ACTH producing tumors. Zemskova et al. [41] assessed the utility of various functional imaging modalities for detection of ectopic ACTH-producing tumors. Low dose SRS, high dose SRS, FDG-PET, and FDOPA-PET had sensitivities per patient of 57%, 50%, 64%, and 55% and positive predictive values (PPV) per lesion of 79, 89, 53, and 100%, respectively. They concluded that a combination of conventional imaging along with SRS should be used for initial evaluation of such tumors. SRS with Ga-68 DOTATOC/NOC has been employed for detecting ectopic ACTH producing tumors. [42] Experience from our centre shows limited value of this modality for this indication. FDG PET-CT has been investigated in patients with adrenal carcinoma. In a large study the sensitivities for the detection of distinct lesions and the diagnosis of metastatic organs were 90 and 93% for FDG PET-CT and 88 and 82% for CT, respectively. [43] Mackie et al. [44] evaluated FDG PET-CT in locally recurrent and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). They concluded that most ACC accumulate and retain FDG. However, an occasional or very small tumor may not accumulate sufficient FDG to allow detection.


   Primary Hyperaldosteronism Top


Primary aldosteronism can occur at all ages, although in most reported series, patients fall in the 30 to 50 year age range. Primary aldosteronism is a common cause of resistant hypertension in black and white patients. [45] It should be considered as a diagnostic possibility in any patient with spontaneous hypokalemia, moderately severe hypokalemia induced by usual doses of diuretics, or refractory hypertension. [46] The adrenal pathology underlying this syndrome is either an aldosterone-secreting cortical adenoma (usually <2 cm in diameter) or bilateral hyperplasia of the zona glomerulosa. Adrenal scintigraphy with NP59 has been employed for functional imaging of aldosterone producing tumors. Scintigraphy in hyperaldosteronism is facilitated with the use of dexamethasone administration with the goal of suppressing the ACTH-dependent component of radiocholesterol uptake occurring in the zona fasciculata. Early visualization, before the fifth day after injection, in a unilateral pattern (aldosteronoma) or bilateral pattern (adrenal hyperplasia) before day 5 after injection is the hallmark of primary aldosteronism. More recently, SPECT-CT with NP59 has been employed for evaluation of primary aldosteronism. Chen et al. [47] evaluated NP59 SPECT-CT in 15 patients with CKD and atypical presentation of primary aldosteronism. Yen et al. [48] evaluated NP59 SPECT-CT in 31 adrenal lesions of 27 patients who had been clinically confirmed to have PA, had inconclusive CT and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) test results, and had undergone NP-59 imaging before adrenalectomy. NP59 SPECT-CT had sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 66.6%. SPECT-CT performed significantly better than planar imaging (P = 0.039). PET with 11C-Metomidate (MTO) has also been used for evaluation for primary aldosteronism. Hennings et al. [49] evaluated dexamethasone suppression treatment MTO PET in 13 patients with adrenocortical tumors. All tumors were detected and categorised as adrenocortical by MTO-PET. SUVmax were higher in primary aldestonism compared to nonfunctional adenomas. Normal adrenal cortex was suppressed after dexamethasone (P < 0.05), but tumor SUV was not significantly decreased after suppression in either primary aldosteonism or nonfunctional tumors (P > 0.05).


   Thyroid Disorders Top


Approximately one-third of patients with hyperthyroidism have hypertension, which often resolves after achieving euthyroidism. Hyperthyroidism increases systolic blood pressure by increasing heart rate, decreasing systemic vascular resistance, and raising cardiac output. In thyrotoxicosis, patients usually are tachycardic and have high cardiac output with an increased stroke volume and elevated systolic blood pressure. The main indication of nuclear medicine technique is differentiation of thyroiditis from Grave's disease. Radio-iodine uptake (RAIU) with I-123/I-131NaI is commonly employed for this purpose. Increased RAIU at 2 hr and 24 hrs is seen in Grave's disease. I-131 is also commonly employed for radioablation of hyper-functioning thyroid glands in case of Grave's disease. Hypothyroid patients have impaired endothelial function, increased systemic vascular resistance, extracellular volume expansion, and an increased diastolic blood pressure. In 32% of hypertensive hypothyroid patients, replacement therapy with thyroxine leads to a fall in diastolic blood pressure to 90 mm Hg or less. The only indication of thyroid scan in such patients is evaluation of thyroid nodules.


   Others Top


Other uncommon causes of endocrine hypertension include acromegaly, insulin resistance, Liddle syndrome, Geller syndrome, pseudohyperaldosteronism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and reninoma. Although few case reports are present in literature, nuclear medicine modalities have no established role in management of these uncommon conditions.


   Conclusion Top


Nuclear medicine techniques play an important role for evaluation and management of patients with endocrine hypertension. I123/I131-MIBG with or without SPECT-CT is routinely employed for imaging pheochromocytomas. PET-CT with FDOPA/FDA might be better than MIBG scintigraphy for this purpose. SRS with Ga-68 DOTANOC appears to be useful for extra-adrenal, metastatic and small lesions. NP 59 scintigraphy can be employed for differential diagnosis of primary hypercotisolism in doubtful cases. NP 59 scintigraphy with Dexamethasone suppression is very useful for evaluation of primary aldosteronism. Thyroid scan and RAIU are routinely employed in management of hyper-hypothoroidism. Development of newer tracers might further expand the role of nuclear medicine in endocrine hypertension.

 
   References Top

1.Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet 2005;366:665-75.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Lockhart ME, Smith JK, Kenney PJ. Imaging of adrenal masses. Eur J Radiol 2002;41:95-112.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Sahdev A, Reznek RH. Imaging evaluation of the non-functioning indeterminate adrenal mass. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2004;15:271- 6.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Sohaib SA, Bomanji J, Evanson J, Reznek RH. Imaging of the endocrine system. In: Grainger RG, Allison DJ, Adam A, Dixon AK, editors. Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology - A Textbook of Medical Imaging. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 1367-99.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Mayo-Smith WW, Boland GW, Noto RB, Lee MJ. State-of-the-art adrenal imaging. Radiographics 2001;21:995-1012.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Furuta N, Kiyota H, Yoshigoe F, Hasegawa N, Ohishi Y. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma using [123I]- compared with [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Int J Urol 1999;6:119-24.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Ilias I, Shulkin B, Pacak K. New functional imaging modalities for chromaffin tumors, neuroblastomas and ganglioneuromas. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2005;16:66-72.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Sisson JC, Frager MS, Valk TW, Gross MD, Swanson DP, Wieland DM, et al. Scintigraphic localization of pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 1981;305:12-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Sisson JC, Shulkin BL. Nuclear medicine imaging of pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma. Q J Nucl Med 1999;43:217- 23.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Nielsen JT, Nielsen BV, Rehling M. Location of adrenal medullary pheochromocytoma by I-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine SPECT. Clin Nucl Med 1996;21:695-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.van der Harst E, de Herder WW, Bruining HA, Bonjer HJ, de Krijger RR, Lamberts SW, et al. [123 I]metaiodobenzylguanidine and [(111)In]octreotide uptake in benign and malignant pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:685-93.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to Patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication. Oxford, U.K: Pergamon Press; 1988. p. 329-31.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Lynn MD, Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Swanson DP, Mangner TJ, Wieland DM, et al. Portrayal of pheochromocytoma and normal human adrenal medulla by m-[123I] iodobenzylguanidine: Concise communication. J Nucl Med 1984;25:436-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Elgazzar AH, Gelfand MJ, Washburn LC, Clark J, Nagaraj N, Cummings D, et al. I-123 MIBG scintigraphy in adults. A report of clinical experience. Clin Nucl Med 1995;20:147-52.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Eisenhofer G. The role of neuronal and extraneuronal plasma membrane transporters in the inactivation of peripheral catecholamines. Pharmacol Ther 2001;91:35-62.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Solanki KK, Bomanji J, Moyes J, Mather SJ, Trainer PJ, Britton KE. A pharmacological guide to medicines which interfere with the biodistribution of radiolabelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). Nucl Med Commun 1992;13:513-21.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Rozovsky K, Koplewitz BZ, Krausz Y, Revel-Vilk S, Weintraub M, Chisin R, et al. Added value of SPECT/CT for correlation of MIBG scintigraphy and diagnostic CT in neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1085-90.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Fukuoka M, Taki J, Mochizuki T, Kinuya S. Comparison of diagnostic value of I-123 MIBG and high-dose I-131 MIBG scintigraphy including incremental value of SPECT/CT over planar image in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med 2011;36:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Ueberberg B, Tourne H, Redman A, Walz MK, Schmid KW, Mann K, et al. Differential expression of the human somatostatin receptor subtypes sst1 to sst5 in various adrenal tumors and normal adrenal gland. Horm Metab Res 2005;37:722-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Limouris GS, Giannakopoulos V, Stavraka A, Toubanakis N, Vlahos L. Comparison of In-111 pentetreotide, Tc-99m (V) DMSA and I-123 mIBG scintimaging in neural crest tumors. Anticancer Res 1997;17:1589-92.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Lastoria S, Maurea S, Vergara E, Acampa W, Varrella P, Klain M, et al. Comparison of labeled MIBG and somatostatin analogs in imaging neuroendocrine tumors. Q J Nucl Med 1995;39:145-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Kaltsas G, Korbonits M, Heintz E, Mukherjee JJ, Jenkins PJ, Chew SL, et al. Comparison of somatostatin analog and meta-iodobenzylguanidine radionuclides in the diagnosis and localization of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:895-902.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Lin YC, Hung GU, Luo TY, Chen CH, Hsia CC, Hen SL, et al. A comparison of biodistribution between 111In-DTPA octreotide and 111In-DOTATOC in rats bearing pancreatic tumors. J Vet Med Sci 2006;68:367-71.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Wild D, Macke HR, Waser B, Reubi JC, Ginj M, Rasch H, et al. 68Ga- DOTANOC: A first compound for PET imaging with high affinity for somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:724.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Kroiss A, Putzer D, Uprimny C, Decristoforo C, Gabriel M, Santner W, et al. Functional imaging in phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma with 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr 3-octreotide positron emission tomography and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:865-73.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Brink I, Hoegerle S, Klisch J, Bley TA. Imaging of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Fam Cancer 2005;4:61-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Shulkin BL, Thompson NW, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Sisson JC. Pheochromocytomas: Imaging with 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. Radiology 1999;212:35-41.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Hoegerle S, Nitzsche E, Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Manz T, Brink I, et al. Pheochromocytomas: Detection with 18F DOPA whole-body PET-initial results. Radiology 2002;222:507-12.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Imani F, Agopian VG, Auerbach MS, Walter MA, Imani F, Benz MR, et al. 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT accurately localize pheochromocytomas. J Nucl Med 2009;50:513-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Fiebrich HB, Brouwers AH, Kerstens MN, Pijl ME, Kema IP, de Jong JR, et al. 18F-DOPA PET is superior to conventional imaging with 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, CT, and MRI in localizing tumors causing catecholamine excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:3922-30.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Taieb D, Tessonnier L, Sebag F, Niccoli-Sire P, Morange I, Colavolpe C, et al. The role of 18F-FDOPA and 18F-FDG-PET in the management of malignant and multifocal phaeochromocytomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;69:580-6.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Timmers HJ, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Ling A, Havekes B, et al. Comparison of 18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose, and 18 F-Fluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Localization of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:4757-67.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Li ST, Goldstein DS. 6-[18F]fluorodopamine positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning for diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. Hypertension 2001;38:6-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Timmers HJ, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Ling A, Havekes B. Comparison of 18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-Fluoro- Deoxyglucose, and 18F-Fluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Localization of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:4757-67.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Gross MD, Rubello D, Shapiro B. Is there a future for adrenal scintigraphy? Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:197-202.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Gross MD, Valk TW, Swanson DP, Thrall JH, Grekin RJ, Beirewaltes WH. The role of pharmacologic manipulation in adrenal cortical scintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med 1981;11:128-48.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Fig LM, Gross MD, Shapiro B, Ehrmann DA, Freitas JE, Schteingart DE, et al. The localization of abnormal adrenal function in the ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1988;109:547-53.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Xu H, Zhang M, Zhai G, Zhang M, Ning G, Li B. The role of integrated (18) F-FDG PET/CT in identification of ectopic ACTH secretion tumors. Endocrine 2009;36:385-91.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Kumar J, Spring M, Carroll PV, Barrington SF, Powrie JK. 18Flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the localization of ectopic ACTH-secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64:371-4.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Pacak K, Ilias I, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Nieman LK. The role of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and [(111)In]-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate-D-Phe-pentetreotide scintigraphy in the localization of ectopic adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors causing Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2214-21.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Zemskova MS, Gundabolu B, Sinaii N, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, et al. Utility of various functional and anatomic imaging modalities for detection of ectopic adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:1207-19.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Singer J, Werner F, Koch CA, Bartels M, Aigner T, Lincke T, et al. Ectopic Cushing's syndrome caused by a well differentiated ACTH-secreting neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ileum. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2010;118:524-9.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Leboulleux S, Dromain C, Bonniaud G, Aupérin A, Caillou B, Lumbroso J, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in adrenocortical carcinoma: A prospective comparison with computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:920-5.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Mackie GC, Shulkin BL, Ribeiro RC, Worden FP, Gauger PG, Mody RJ, et al. Use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating locally recurrent and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2665- 71.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Calhoun DA, Nishizaka MK, Zaman MA, Thakkar RB, Weissmann P. Hyperaldosteronism among black and white subjects with resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2002;40:892-6.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.Young WF. Primary aldosteronism: Renaissance of a syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;66:607-18.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Chen YC, Su YC, Wei CK, Chiu JS, Tseng CE, Chen SJ, et al. Diagnostic value of I-131 NP-59 SPECT/CT scintigraphy in patients with subclinical or atypical features of primary aldosteronism. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011;2011:209787.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.Yen RF, Wu VC, Liu KL, Cheng MF, Wu YW, Chueh SC, et al. 131I-6beta-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol SPECT/CT for primary aldosteronism patients with inconclusive adrenal venous sampling and CT results. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1631-7.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.Hennings J, Sundin A, Hägg A, Hellman P. 11C-metomidate positron emission tomography after dexamethasone suppression for detection of small adrenocortical adenomas in primary aldosteronism. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010;395:963-7.  Back to cited text no. 49
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Pheochromocytoma
   Cushing's Syndrome
   PET/PET-CT
    Primary Hyperald...
   Thyroid Disorders
   Others
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4943    
    Printed59    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded582    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal