Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 631 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 
Table of Contents
MINI REVIEW
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 205-212

Assessing bone health in children and adolescents


Director, Center for Bone Health, Chief, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Professor of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, USA

Date of Web Publication4-Jan-2013

Correspondence Address:
Michael A Levine
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Boulevard, 11 NWT 30, Philadelphia, PA 19104
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.104040

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

During normal childhood and adolescence, the skeleton undergoes tremendous change. Utilizing the processes of modeling and remodeling, the skeleton acquires its adult configuration and ultimately achieves peak bone mass. Optimization of peak bone mass requires the proper interaction of environmental, dietary, hormonal, and genetic influences. A variety of acute and chronic conditions, as well as genetic polymorphisms, are associated with reduced bone density, which can lead to an increased risk of fracture both in childhood and later during adulthood. Bone densitometry has an established role in the evaluation of adults with bone disorders, and the development of suitable reference ranges for children now permits the application of this technology to younger individuals. We present a brief overview of the factors that determine bone density and the emerging role of bone densitometry in the assessment of bone mass in growing children and adolescents.

Keywords: Bone health, children, adolescents


How to cite this article:
Levine MA. Assessing bone health in children and adolescents. Indian J Endocr Metab 2012;16, Suppl S2:205-12

How to cite this URL:
Levine MA. Assessing bone health in children and adolescents. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Nov 23];16, Suppl S2:205-12. Available from: https://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2012/16/8/205/104040


   Introduction Top


Senile osteoporosis begins as a pediatric disease. This seeming paradox is rooted in the fact that there is intense skeletal growth and development during childhood and adolescence, and much more bone is formed than lost. Later in life, the loss of bone tissue exceeds the rate of bone replacement. It, therefore, follows that lifelong bone health is dependent on maximizing peak bone mass during the critical periods of growth and maturation. One commonly cited notion is that each individual possesses a "Bone Bank," in which early deposits lay the foundation for skeletal health; later, during aging or in response to metabolic stresses, skeletal remodeling accelerates and withdrawals from the account exceed deposits, thereby compromising skeletal integrity. The natural process of bone remodeling makes youth the best time to "invest" in one's bone health.

Skeletal development and growth

Development and growth of the skeleton occur through the coordinated interaction of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Osteoblasts are bone-forming cells, and are derived from pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells that can also differentiate into muscle, adipocytes, cartilage, or fibrous tissue. Bone is resorbed by osteoclasts, large, multinucleated cells that can dissolve mineral and release calcium and phosphorus into the extracellular fluid. Osteoclasts are related to monocyte/macrophage cells. During embryogenesis, and after birth as the child grows, the skeleton continues to undergo changes in architecture and size that are termed "modeling," with coordinate increases in bone mineral mass and density. These changes are achieved through sustained modeling through puberty. In addition to modeling, bones are continuously reshaped by removing and replacing skeletal structures already present, a process termed remodeling.

Exquisitely complex cross-talk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts is required to effect these changes through the remodeling of existing bone and modeling of new bone as bone growth proceeds. Linear growth during childhood and adolescence occurs by growth of cartilage at the end plates of long bones, followed by endochondral bone formation. The width of the bones increases by periosteal apposition. During puberty and early adult life, endosteal apposition and trabecular thickening provide maximum skeletal mass and strength (peak bone mass). Locally and systemically produced factors and mechanical forces influence these processes and control the coordinated functions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts to preserve structural strength. [1] The adult skeleton continues to undergo remodeling throughout life, replacing approximately 15% of the mature skeleton each year to maintain mineral homeostasis, to repair damaged bone, and to respond to changes in skeletal stress.

Bone remodeling occurs most often in skeletal sites rich in cancellous (trabecular) bone, such as the vertebrae, proximal femur, calcaneus, and ultradistal radius. A second form of bone, termed cortical bone, is less metabolically active but provides great strength and integrity to the skeleton. Cortical bone comprises 80% of the skeleton, is dense and compact, and constitutes the outer part of all skeletal structures.

During the first two decades of life, the skeleton grows in both size and density, and it is estimated that more than half of peak bone mass is acquired during the teen years. [2] The process of bone growth is not uniform, and the axial and appendicular skeleton increase in size at different rates. [3],[4] Specifically, there is proportionately greater growth in the limbs than the trunk prior to puberty. In early and mid-puberty, the relative rate of growth of the spine increases and growth slows at all sites in late puberty. [5],[6] The rapid growth of the skeleton during puberty exceeds the rate of mineralization, and bone mineral accrual lags behind growth in height by 8 months. [7],[8]

Bone mass continues to accumulate until around age 30. [9],[10] At that point, bones reach their maximum strength and density, known as peak bone mass. Women tend to experience minimal change in total bone mass between age 30 and menopause. But, in the first few years after menopause, many women experience a period of rapid bone loss, which then slows but continues throughout the post-menopausal years. This loss of bone mass can lead to osteoporosis, a condition of weakened bones and increased risk of fragility fracture. In men, age-related bone loss occurs later and proceeds at a steady rate. In both men and women, declining bone mass is the primary cause of weak bones and fractures. It is estimated [11] that 10 million Americans over age 50 have osteoporosis, which represents significant health and economic costs to society. If osteoporosis has origins in childhood, then understanding the factors affecting bone accretion in childhood may be the key to early prevention of this common, disabling condition.

However, there is increasing recognition that many children fail to optimize bone accretion during childhood and adolescence and concern that inadequate skeletal mass will result in fragile bones and increased risk of fractures both in childhood and later as adults. [12] For example, many childhood conditions pose threats to bone health through primary disease effects such as mal-absorption, secondary effects such as prolonged periods of physical inactivity or treatment effects such as glucocorticoid therapy. Moreover, improvements in treatment now enable many children with severe medical conditions, such as cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer, to enjoy significant improvements in life expectancy and in many cases, surviving to adulthood. Endocrine disorders such as growth hormone deficiency, hypothyroidism or hypoparathyroidism may limit growth, but apparently do not impair acquisition of bone mass. By contrast, primary hyperparathyroidism and hyperthyroidism, although uncommon in children, can have significant adverse effects on bone mass. And finally, many otherwise normal children experience nutritional deficiencies of calcium or vitamin D that can impair acquisition of optimal bone mass. Several studies estimate that 30% of children will experience a fracture before reaching adulthood. [13] Childhood fractures most commonly occur in the distal extremities, particularly the forearm. Several risk factors have been associated with childhood fracture, including lower bone density, a previous fracture, European ancestry, obesity, and low dairy intake. [14],[15],[16],[17]

Based on these concerns, in 2000, the U.S. National Institutes of Health convened experts at a Consensus Development Conference on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment. [18] Among other measures, the conference recommended developing research strategies to optimize bone mass during the first two decades of life, and to identify and intervene in disorders that compromise attainment of peak bone mass, particularly in children with chronic disease.

What affects bone mass in children

Bone mass is determined through a complex interaction of environmental, behavioral, and genetic traits. About 60% to 80% of the contribution to peak bone mass is thought to be genetically determined, [12] although not all the relevant genes have yet been identified. [19],[20] The effect of heredity, and genetics, is manifest during childhood, prior to puberty. [12],[21] These genetic effects can also account for differences in bone density between population groups and are evident in childhood. [2] For example, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) is greater for African American compared to Caucasian, while Caucasians have greater aBMD than either Asians and Hispanics.

The identification of specific genetic mutations that cause low bone density in subjects with rare bone disorders (e.g. collagen 1 alpha 1 (COL1A1) in osteogenesis imperfecta and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) in osteoporosis pseudoglioma syndrome) have stimulated large population studies to discover genetic variants that are associated with bone density and risk of osteoporosis. These population variants include polymorphisms in the regulatory region of COL1A1 gene [22] that are associated with decreased bone mineral content and aBMD at several sites in pre-pubertal [23] or adolescent [24] girls. In adolescents, polymorphisms of the estrogen receptor, aromatase, interleukin-6, LRP5, and osteocalcin genes have also been shown to be independent predictors of bone size, BMC, or BMD. [25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35] Recent discoveries resulting from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) further confirm the relevance of genetic contributions to bone density. [36] There have been more than 40 published GWAS on skeletal phenotypes, predominantly focused on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived aBMD of the hip and spine. Remarkably, 66 BMD loci have been replicated across all the published GWAS, confirming the highly polygenic nature of BMD variation. Only seven of the 66 previously reported genes (LRP5, SOST, ESR1, TNFRSF11B, TNFRSF11A, TNFSF11, PTH) from candidate gene association studies have been confirmed by GWAS. In addition, 59 novel BMD GWAS loci have been recently identified, including some that are involved in important biological pathways involving the skeleton, particularly Wnt signaling (AXIN1, LRP5, CTNNB1, DKK1, FOXC2, HOXC6, LRP4, MEF2C, PTHLH, RSPO3, SFRP4, TGFBR3, WLS, WNT3, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT16), bone development and ossification (CLCN7, CSF1, MEF2C, MEPE, PKDCC, PTHLH, RUNX2, SOX6, SOX9, SPP1, SP7), mesenchymal-stem-cell differentiation (FAM3C, MEF2C, RUNX2, SOX4, SOX9, SP7), osteoclast differentiation (JAG1, RUNX2), and TGF-signaling (FOXL1, SPTBN1, TGFBR3) (reviewed in. [37] By contrast, GWAS of BMD in children have been more limited and have identified few loci (e.g. near the Osterix (SP7) gene [35] and WNT16 gene [38] that are associated with bone density. Each of these different genetic variants can explain only a very small effect on overall BMD, however.

Environmental and behavioral factors account for the remaining 20% to 40% of variability in bone mass, and variations in nutrition (particularly calcium and vitamin D) and physical activity are particularly important. [2],[12],[17],[21],[39],[40],[41],[42],[ 43] Calcium supplementation studies in children showed that children with calcium-deficient diets experience a modest (about 3%) increase in BMD with calcium supplementation. [44],[45],[46] The effect is most pronounced in pre-pubertal children. These effects of calcium are transient, however. [47],[48] Nevertheless, other studies have suggested that increasing calcium intake during childhood through dietary fortification with dairy sources may provide more long-lasting improvements in BMD. [49],[50] Optimal absorption of calcium from the gastrointestinal tract requires normal vitamin D homeostasis. [51] The primary source of vitamin D is the skin. High-energy UVB light, principally from sunlight, penetrates the epidermis and photochemically cleaves 7-dehydrocholesterol to produce previtamin-D 3 . Previtamin-D3 then undergoes a thermally-induced isomerization to vitamin D 3 (cholecalciferol) that takes two to three days to reach completion. Therefore, after a single sunlight exposure, cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D 3 continues for many hours. It is not possible to generate too much vitamin D3 in the skin, as prolonged sunlight exposure activates a mechanism that converts excess previtamin D3 and vitamin D3 to biologically inert products. Vitamin D can also be obtained from the diet, from plant sources as ergocalciferol (vitamin D 2 ), and from animal sources as cholecalciferol (vitamin D 3 ). Dietary and endogenously-produced vitamin D can be stored in fat for later use. To become metabolically active, vitamin D must undergo two biochemical modifications. Vitamin D first undergoes 25-hydroxylation in the liver by the cytochrome p450 enzyme CYP2R1 to form 25(OH)D. Subsequently, 25-(OH)D 3 is directed to the kidney where it is either converted to 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 (an inactive derivative) or to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 [calcitriol, the active hormone]. Activation to calcitriol requires hydroxylation by a 1α-hydroxylase enzyme (CYP27B1) that is tightly regulated and is the rate-limiting step in the bioactivation of vitamin D: Parathyroid hormone increases production of calcitriol by stimulating CYP27B1 activity while FGF23 decreases CYP27B1 activity. Dietary intake of vitamin D is inadequate in many parts of the world and, therefore, daily requirements for vitamin D depend upon cutaneous synthesis and sunlight exposure. Dark skin, use of UV sunblockers, or customs of dress that largely cover the skin can reduce cutaneous absorption of UVB light and thereby prevent adequate synthesis of vitamin D to meet daily or long-term requirements.

It is also important to note that other nutrients, such as vitamin D and K, copper, protein, phosphorus, magnesium, manganese, zinc, energy, and iron, [52] also appear important for bone health.

In addition to diet, physical activity, particularly weight-bearing activity, is an important determinant of bone mass. Bone contains a network of osteocytes that constitute a bio-mechanostat that can detect load and stress on the skeleton. Bone stress induces signals that stimulate osteoblast bone formation and reduces osteoclast bone resorption, leading to increased bone mass. Muscle mass provides an excellent index of the mechanical stimulation to bone and is highly correlated to bone mass, density, and architecture (Wetzsteon et al. 2011). Multiple studies in healthy children have shown an association between physical activity and aBMD, [41],[42],[53],[54],[55] and athletes, such as gymnasts [56] and tennis players, [57] have increased bone density, dimensions, and strength during growth. Moreover, modest increases in weight-bearing physical activity can result in significant improvements in bone density and strength in growing children and adolescents. [58] Importantly, the benefits of enhanced physical activity on bone density can persist beyond adolescence and result in greater bone density in young adulthood. [59] By contrast, children who are unable to bear weight or have neuromuscular disorders that reduce load on the skeleton have significantly reduced bone density and are at increased risk of fractures, particularly in the lower limbs. [60]

Other important factors include body mass. Although obese children typically have higher bone mass and density and larger bones, [61],[62],[63],[64] their risk of fracture is increased and visceral fat mass is inversely related to bone mass. By contrast, lean body mass (i.e., muscle mass) is positively correlated to bone mass. [65] Hormonal influences (including estrogen, testosterone, and parathyroid hormone), infectious agents (such as HIV), metabolic disorders, and cancer. Because gonadal hormones secreted during puberty increase bone mass, delayed puberty has a limiting effect on BMD during adolescence that appears to resolve over time in males. [55],[66],[67] Chronic inflammatory diseases, such as Crohn's disease or juvenile idiopathic arthritis, may accelerate bone resorption due to inflammatory cytokines produced in the disease process. Childhood malignancy, particularly leukemia, can compromise bone health. And, endocrine disorders such as diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, primary hyperparathyroidism, and glucocorticoid excess are associated with reduced bone mass and increased risk of fracture.

Quantitative bone assessment

A history of recurrent fractures, particularly low-impact or atraumatic fractures, should lead the clinician to carefully consider whether a child may have reduced bone strength, and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry has recommended that a child with a history of two upper extremity or one lower extremity fractures undergo an assessment of bone density. [68],[69]

Early attempts to measure bone density utilized plain skeletal radiography. However, bone demineralization becomes visibly apparent only after bone density loss exceeds 40%, making this test too insensitive for clinical use. More quantitative imaging technologies for assessing bone health have been developed, and currently used modalities include metacarpal morphometry, quantitative ultrasound, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). At present, adequate databases for children are lacking for metacarpal morphometry and quantitative ultrasound. QCT has an advantage over the other techniques because it measures bone volume and thus accurately computes volumetric BMD (vBMD). In addition, it differentiates dense cortical bone from metabolically active trabecular bone. Its drawback is that it exposes the patient to a substantial amount of radiation (effective radiation dose 60 μSv), which limits utility for follow-up studies. Peripheral QCT is emerging as an attractive alternative technology because it is able to distinguish between the trabecular and cortical bone compartments, but exposes the patient to far less radiation than conventional QCT.

DXA provides considerable advantages: Low radiation exposure (1-3 μSv versus 50 μSv for adult PA chest x-ray and 8 μSv per day background radiation in the U.S.), precise results, and lower cost than QCT. However, unlike QCT, it does not directly measure true volume, and thus computes areal density, not volumetric density. Derived from the area of bone, areal density is a two-dimensional estimation of a three-dimensional property, and the algorithms that make the conversion to density are not entirely satisfactory.

Challenges in assessment of bone health in children

The measurement of bone density in children is less standardized than in adults and requires special consideration of the effects of growth and puberty on bone mass. [68],[69] Interpretation of bone density in children relies on Z-scores-the number of standard deviations (SD) from the norm of a reference database of children. A Z-score of -2 SD represents low bone density, but indications for treatment and specific therapy are not yet established. In contrast, bone mass density in adults is measured in T-scores-standard deviations from peak bone mass, with a T-score of -2.5 SD or worse representing osteoporosis, as codified by the World Health Organization in 1994. In children, the relationship between bone density and fracture risk is less firmly established than in adults. [15],[16]

There are important confounding factors to consider when performing DXA in children and adolescents, such as variations in age, race, gender, pubertal status, and height. [70],[71] For example, many early reference data sets did not distinguish between boys and girls. As girls experience an earlier puberty than boys, this can lead to an overestimation of low bone mass. For example, Leonard et al. [72] showed that reference ranges that are not sex-specific incorrectly identified 9-13% of girls and 24-44% of boys as having low bone mass compared to only 11-16% of girls 10% of boys when age- and sex-specific reference data were used. Racial differences may be relevant; in the U.S., bone density tends to be higher in African Americans than in other groups. [73] The lack of suitable reference ranges has been addressed by a multi-center U.S. study, 'The Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study' (BMDCS), that evaluated 2014 children, aged 5-19 years at enrollment, annually for up to 7 years. This study now provides robust reference ranges for bone measurements at different sites and allows distinctions for race, age, and gender. [73]

It is also important to consider height and pubertal status. DXA measurements of aBMD are strongly influenced by bone size. Children who are tall for age have larger bones and hence, greater BMC and aBMD than those who are average or short for age. [71] This effect is attenuated when volumetric bone density is assessed, however. The effect of height on aBMD is intensified around the ages when pubertal development typically occurs, because taller children are often earlier maturing children in the early pubertal years and short children are often later maturing children in the later pubertal years. Consequently, DXA measurements should be adjusted for absolute height, preferably as height-specific Z-scores. [71],[73] Similarly, a child's pubertal status must be considered when analyzing bone densitometry, as children with delayed maturation will have lower bone mass than their peers who have higher levels of estrogen or testosterone.

Technical considerations must also be addressed. DXA technology has addressed the lower bone density in children with the introduction of a low density software option for young children. This option uses a different bone edge detection algorithm to accommodate the lower attenuation values that occur in measuring young children. Differences between machines, particularly of different manufacturers, can introduce measurement differences that limit comparisons between studies. Recently, cross-calibration equations have been developed for whole-body bone density and composition derived using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems. [74] These equations reduce differences between aBMD and body composition as determined by GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic systems and will facilitate combining study results in clinical or epidemiological studies. [74]

Finally, errors in interpretation of pediatric bone densitometry can lead to spurious results that generate unnecessary worry and expense. A 2004 study found significant overdiagnosis of pediatric osteoporosis among children who had been referred to an osteoporosis trial on the basis of low aBMD scores inferred from DXA. [75] In that study, 88% of the scans had one or more errors in interpretation, including non-gender-specific reference data, inattention to short stature, and the incorrect use of a T-score instead of a Z-score. After correcting for these errors, 53% of the children who been referred for low BMD scores were found to have normal bone mineral density.


   Conclusions Top


Clearly, refinements in reference data will improve the accuracy of clinical assessments of bone health in children and adolescents. Recently, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) issued recommendations for DXA interpretation in children. The ISCD stated that an appropriate reference dataset must include "a sample of the general healthy population sufficiently large to characterize the normal variability in bone measures that takes into consideration sex, age and race/ethnicity." [69]

Another recommendation stated that "In children with linear growth or maturational delay, BMC and BMD results should be adjusted for absolute height or height age, or compared to pediatric reference data that provide age-, sex-, and height-specific Z-scores."

Specific therapy for children with low bone density is best left to clinicians who are highly experienced in the evaluation and management of pediatric bone disorders. Available agents for adults with osteoporosis and other pharmacologic treatments may be useful in selected circumstances for children with low bone density, but such children must be treated very carefully as long-term safety data are not yet available.

In summary, evaluation of bone density by DXA is appropriate for children and adolescents who have a history of fragility fracture or specific risk factors for low bone density. As better diagnostic techniques become available and specific criteria for diagnosis are developed, it is likely that pediatric-specific pharmacologic agents will be forthcoming. Until that time, it is reasonable to refer children and adolescents who have a suspected metabolic bone disease to a pediatric bone specialist.

 
   References Top

1.Rauch F. Bone accrual in children: Adding substance to surfaces. Pediatrics. 2007;119 Suppl 2:S137-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Bachrach LK. Acquisition of optimal bone mass in childhood and adolescence. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2001;12:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child 1976;51:170-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marubini E, Resele LF. The adolescent growth spurt of boys and girls of the Harpenden growth study. Ann Hum Biol 1976;3:109-26.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Bradney M, Karlsson MK, Duan Y, Stuckey S, Bass S, Seeman E. Heterogeneity in the growth of the axial and appendicular skeleton in boys: Implications for the pathogenesis of bone fragility in men. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:1871-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Bass S, Delmas PD, Pearce G, Hendrich E, Tabensky A, Seeman E. The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest 1999;104:795-804.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.McKay HA, Bailey DA, Mirwald RL, Davison KS, Faulkner RA. Peak bone mineral accrual and age at menarche in adolescent girls: A 6-year longitudinal study. J Pediatr 1998;133:682-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Bailey DA, Martin AD, McKay HA, Whiting S, Mirwald R. Calcium accretion in girls and boys during puberty: A longitudinal analysis. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:2245-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Baxter-Jones AD, Faulkner RA, Forwood MR, Mirwald RL, Bailey DA. Bone mineral accrual from 8 to 30 years of age: An estimation of peak bone mass. J Bone Miner Res 2011;26:1729-39.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Ohlsson C. Age of attainment of peak bone mass is site specific in Swedish men--The GOOD study. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:1223-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD). Office of the Surgeon General (US). 2004.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Heaney RP, Abrams S, Dawson-Hughes B, Looker A, Marcus R, Matkovic V, et al. Peak bone mass. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:985-1009.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Cooper C, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Bishop N, van Staa TP. Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: A study using the general practice research database. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:1976-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Goulding A, Jones IE, Taylor RW, Manning PJ, Williams SM. More broken bones: A 4-year double cohort study of young girls with and without distal forearm fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:2011-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Kalkwarf HJ, Laor T, Bean JA. Fracture risk in children with a forearm injury is associated with volumetric bone density and cortical area (by peripheral QCT) and areal bone density (by DXA). Osteoporos Int 2011;22:607-16.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Clark EM, Tobias JH, Ness AR. Association between bone density and fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2006;117:e291-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Goulding A, Rockell JE, Black RE, Grant AM, Jones IE, Williams SM. Children who avoid drinking cow's milk are at increased risk for prepubertal bone fractures. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:250-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement 2000;17:1-45.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Karasik D, Hsu YH, Zhou Y, Cupples LA, Kiel DP, Demissie S. Genome-wide pleiotropy of osteoporosis-related phenotypes: The Framingham Study. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25:1555-63.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Liu CT, Karasik D, Zhou Y, Hsu YH, Genant HK, Broe KE, et al. Heritability of prevalent vertebral fracture and volumetric bone mineral density and geometry at the lumbar spine in three generations of the Framingham study. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:954-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Ferrari S, Rizzoli R, Bonjour JP. Heritable and nutritional influences on bone mineral mass. Aging 1998;10:205-13.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.Grant SF, Reid DM, Blake G, Herd R, Fogelman I, Ralston SH. Reduced bone density and osteoporosis associated with a polymorphic Sp1 binding site in the collagen type I alpha 1 gene. Nat Genet 1996;14:203-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.Sainz J, Van Tornout JM, Sayre J, Kaufman F, Gilsanz V. Association of collagen type 1 alpha1 gene polymorphism with bone density in early childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:853-55.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.Suuriniemi M, Kovanen V, Mahonen A, Alen M, Wang Q, Lyytikainen A, et al. COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism associates with bone density in early puberty. Bone 2006;39:591-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Lorentzon M, Lorentzon R, Backstrom T, Nordstrom P. Estrogen receptor gene polymorphism, but not estradiol levels, is related to bone density in healthy adolescent boys: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:4597-601.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Lorentzon M, Lorentzon R, Nordstrom P. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism is associated with birth height, growth to adolescence, and adult stature in healthy caucasian men: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1666-70.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Lorentzon M, Lorentzon R, Nordstrom P. Interleukin-6 gene polymorphism is related to bone mineral density during and after puberty in healthy white males: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:1944-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Gustavsson A, Nordstrom P, Lorentzon R, Lerner UH, Lorentzon M. Osteocalcin gene polymorphism is related to bone density in healthy adolescent females. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:847-51.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.van Meurs JB, Trikalinos TA, Ralston SH, Balcells S, Brandi ML, Brixen K, et al. Large-scale analysis of association between LRP5 and LRP6 variants and osteoporosis. JAMA 2008;299:1277-90.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.Saarinen A, Valimaki VV, Valimaki MJ, Loyttyniemi E, Auro K, Uusen P, et al. The A1330V polymorphism of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 gene (LRP5) associates with low peak bone mass in young healthy men. Bone 2007;40:1006-12.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Tobias JH, Steer CD, Vilarino-Guell C, Brown MA. Estrogen receptor alpha regulates area-adjusted bone mineral content in late pubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:641-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Tobias JH, Steer CD, Vilarino-Guell C, Brown MA. Effect of an estrogen receptor-alpha intron 4 polymorphism on fat mass in 11-year-old children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:2286-91.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Koay MA, Tobias JH, Leary SD, Steer CD, Vilarino-Guell C, Brown MA. The effect of LRP5 polymorphisms on bone mineral density is apparent in childhood. Calcif Tissue Int 2007;81:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Vilarino-Guell C, Miles LJ, Duncan EL, Ralston SH, Compston JE, Cooper C, et al. PTHR1 polymorphisms influence BMD variation through effects on the growing skeleton. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007;81:270-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Timpson NJ, Tobias JH, Richards JB, Soranzo N, Duncan EL, Sims AM, et al. Common variants in the region around Osterix are associated with bone mineral density and growth in childhood. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18:1510-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]    
36.Estrada K, Styrkarsdottir U, Evangelou E, Hsu YH, Duncan EL, Ntzani EE, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture. Nat Genet 2012;44:491-501.  Back to cited text no. 36
[PUBMED]    
37.Hsu YH, Kiel DP. Genome-wide association studies of skeletal phenotypes: What we have learned and where we are headed. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E1958-77.  Back to cited text no. 37
[PUBMED]    
38.Medina-Gomez C, Kemp JP, Estrada K, Eriksson J, Liu J, Reppe S, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide scans for total body BMD in children and adults reveals allelic heterogeneity and age-specific effects at the WNT16 locus. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002718.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]    
39.Pekkinen M, Viljakainen H, Saarnio E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Makitie O. Vitamin D is a major determinant of bone mineral density at school age. PLoS One 2012;7:e40090.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Power ML, Heaney RP, Kalkwarf HJ, Pitkin RM, Repke JT, Tsang RC, et al. The role of calcium in health and disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1560-9.  Back to cited text no. 40
[PUBMED]    
41.Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Ohlsson C. Association of amount of physical activity with cortical bone size and trabecular volumetric BMD in young adult men: The GOOD study. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:1936-43.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA. A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: The university of Saskatchewan Bone Mineral Accrual Study. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:1672-9.  Back to cited text no. 42
[PUBMED]    
43.Demay MB, Sabbagh Y, Carpenter TO. Calcium and vitamin D: What is known about the effects on growing bone. Pediatrics 2007;119 Suppl 2:S141-4.  Back to cited text no. 43
[PUBMED]    
44.Johnston CC Jr., Miller JZ, Slemenda CW, Reister TK, Hui S, Christian JC, et al. Calcium supplementation and increases in bone mineral density in children. N Engl J Med 1992;327:82-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Lee WT, Leung SS, Leung DM, Tsang HS, Lau J, Cheng JC. A randomized double-blind controlled calcium supplementation trial, and bone and height acquisition in children. Br J Nutr 1995;74:125-39.  Back to cited text no. 45
[PUBMED]    
46.Lee WT, Leung SS, Wang SH, Xu YC, Zeng WP, Lau J, et al. Double-blind, controlled calcium supplementation and bone mineral accretion in children accustomed to a low-calcium diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;60:744-50.  Back to cited text no. 46
[PUBMED]    
47.Lee WT, Leung SS, Leung DM, Wang SH, Xu YC, Zeng WP, et al. Bone mineral acquisition in low calcium intake children following the withdrawal of calcium supplement. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:570-6.  Back to cited text no. 47
[PUBMED]    
48.Lee WT, Leung SS, Leung DM, Cheng JC. A follow-up study on the effects of calcium-supplement withdrawal and puberty on bone acquisition of children. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64:71-7.  Back to cited text no. 48
[PUBMED]    
49.Bonjour JP, Carrie AL, Ferrari S, Clavien H, Slosman D, Theintz G, et al. Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Invest 1997;99:1287-94.  Back to cited text no. 49
[PUBMED]    
50.Cheng S, Lyytikainen A, Kroger H, Lamberg-Allardt C, Alen M, Koistinen A, et al. Effects of calcium, dairy product, and vitamin D supplementation on bone mass accrual and body composition in 10-12-y-old girls: A 2-y randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:1115-26.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:1911-30.  Back to cited text no. 51
[PUBMED]    
52.Prentice A, Schoenmakers I, Laskey MA, de Bono S, Ginty F, Goldberg GR. Nutrition and bone growth and development. Proc Nutr Soc 2006;65:348-60.  Back to cited text no. 52
[PUBMED]    
53.Wang Q, Alen M, Nicholson P, Suominen H, Koistinen A, Kroger H, et al. Weight-bearing, muscle loading and bone mineral accrual in pubertal girls--a 2-year longitudinal study. Bone. 2007;40:1196-202.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.Nilsson M, Ohlsson C, Oden A, Mellstrom D, Lorentzon M. Increased physical activity is associated with enhanced development of peak bone mass in men: A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:1206-14.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.Boot AM, de Ridder MA, Pols HA, Krenning EP, De Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents: Relation to puberty, calcium intake, and physical activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:57-62.  Back to cited text no. 55
[PUBMED]    
56.Ward KA, Roberts SA, Adams JE, Mughal MZ. Bone geometry and density in the skeleton of pre-pubertal gymnasts and school children. Bone 2005;36:1012-8.  Back to cited text no. 56
[PUBMED]    
57.Ducher G, Tournaire N, Meddahi-Pelle A, Benhamou CL, Courteix D. Short-term and long-term site-specific effects of tennis playing on trabecular and cortical bone at the distal radius. J Bone Miner Metab. 2006;24:484-90.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.Hasselstrom HA, Karlsson MK, Hansen SE, Gronfeldt V, Froberg K, Andersen LB. A 3-year physical activity intervention program increases the gain in bone mineral and bone width in prepubertal girls but not boys: The prospective copenhagen school child interventions study (CoSCIS). Calcif Tissue Int 2008;83:243-50.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.Baxter-Jones AD, Kontulainen SA, Faulkner RA, Bailey DA. A longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual from adolescence to young adulthood. Bone 2008;43:1101-7.  Back to cited text no. 59
[PUBMED]    
60.Henderson RC, Berglund LM, May R, Zemel BS, Grossberg RI, Johnson J, et al. The relationship between fractures and DXA measures of BMD in the distal femur of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy or muscular dystrophy. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25:520-6.  Back to cited text no. 60
[PUBMED]    
61.Leonard MB, Shults J, Wilson BA, Tershakovec AM, Zemel BS. Obesity during childhood and adolescence augments bone mass and bone dimensions. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:514-23.  Back to cited text no. 61
[PUBMED]    
62.Kaulfers AM, Bean JA, Inge TH, Dolan LM, Kalkwarf HJ. Bone loss in adolescents after bariatric surgery. Pediatrics 2011;127:e956-61.  Back to cited text no. 62
[PUBMED]    
63.Clark EM, Ness AR, Tobias JH. Adipose tissue stimulates bone growth in prepubertal children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2534-41.  Back to cited text no. 63
[PUBMED]    
64.Goulding A, Taylor RW, Grant AM, Murdoch L, Williams SM, Taylor BJ. Relationship of total body fat mass to bone area in New Zealand five-year-olds. Calcif Tissue Int 2008;82:293-9.  Back to cited text no. 64
[PUBMED]    
65.Wetzsteon RJ, Zemel BS, Shults J, Howard KM, Kibe LW, Leonard MB. Mechanical loads and cortical bone geometry in healthy children and young adults. Bone 2011;48:1103-8.  Back to cited text no. 65
[PUBMED]    
66.Darelid A, Ohlsson C, Nilsson M, Kindblom JM, Mellstrom D, Lorentzon M. Catch up in bone acquisition in young adult men with late normal puberty. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:2198-207.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.Jackowski SA, Kontulainen SA, Cooper DM, Lanovaz JL, Baxter-Jones AD. The timing of BMD and geometric adaptation at the proximal femur from childhood to early adulthood in males and females: A longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2011;26:2753-61.  Back to cited text no. 67
[PUBMED]    
68.Bachrach LK, Sills IN, Section on Endocrinology. Clinical report-bone densitometry in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2011;127:189-94.  Back to cited text no. 68
[PUBMED]    
69.Bianchi ML, Baim S, Bishop NJ, Gordon CM, Hans DB, Langman CB, et al. Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) on DXA evaluation in children and adolescents. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:37-47.  Back to cited text no. 69
[PUBMED]    
70.Leonard MB, Elmi A, Mostoufi-Moab S, Shults J, Burnham JM, Thayu M, et al. Effects of sex, race, and puberty on cortical bone and the functional muscle bone unit in children, adolescents, and young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:1681-9.  Back to cited text no. 70
[PUBMED]    
71.Zemel BS, Leonard MB, Kelly A, Lappe JM, Gilsanz V, Oberfield S, et al. Height adjustment in assessing dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mass and density in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:1265-73.  Back to cited text no. 71
[PUBMED]    
72.Leonard MB, Propert KJ, Zemel BS, Stallings VA, Feldman HI. Discrepancies in pediatric bone mineral density reference data: Potential for misdiagnosis of osteopenia. J Pediatr 1999;135:182-8.  Back to cited text no. 72
[PUBMED]    
73.Zemel BS, Kalkwarf HJ, Gilsanz V, Lappe JM, Oberfield S, Shepherd JA, et al. Revised reference curves for bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density according to age and sex for black and non-black children: Results of the bone mineral density in childhood study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:3160-9.  Back to cited text no. 73
[PUBMED]    
74.Shepherd JA, Fan B, Lu Y, Wu XP, Wacker WK, Ergun DL, et al. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:2208-16.  Back to cited text no. 74
[PUBMED]    
75.Gafni RI, Baron J. Overdiagnosis of osteoporosis in children due to misinterpretation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). J Pediatr 2004;144:253-7.  Back to cited text no. 75
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Conclusions
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1818    
    Printed41    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded315    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal