Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
Search Article 
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 2395 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 291-293

Outcome in acromegaly: A retrospective analysis

1 Department of Endocrinology, KPC Medical College and Consultant Endocrinologist, Kolkata, India
2 Institute of Child Health and Consultant Endocrinologist, Rabindranath Tagore International Institute, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
Debmalya Sanyal
KPC Medical College and Consultant Endocrinologist, RTIICS, 36 Block H New Alipore, Kolkata - 700 053
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.104063

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Many of the treatment modalities recommended for acromegaly are either too expensive or not available in large parts of India. There is a dearth of treatment and outcome data in Indian patients. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatment modalities used and the respective outcomes which include remission, recurrence, hypopituitarism, other complications, and mortality. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective data analysis of 15 acromegaly patients treated at a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. A remission criteria of nadir growth hormone level <1 μg/dl after Oral Glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and normal age related IGF-1 levels was used. Results: All patients (100%) had macroadenomas. Surgery could not be done in five (33%); three (19.8%) refused, two (13.2%) had comorbidities. Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) achieved remission in four out of ten (40%). Conventional radiotherapy (CRT) failed in all five patients and caused hypopituitarisn in three (60%). Cabergoline (CAB) either alone or following surgery achieved remission in one out of four (25%) though symptomatic relief and tolerability were remarkable. One patient (7%) had pituitary apoplexy with remission, two patients (14.3%) died due to CVA. Conclusions: TSS remains the treatment of choice in acromegaly, though in macroadenomas the success is limited. A sizeable proportion of patients refuse or are unfit for surgery. As most of the recommended options are very costly or unavailable, alternative treatment options generally used are CRT or CAB which have limited efficacy. Incidence of hypopituitarism, following CRT is very high.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded193    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal