|
| |
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2013 | Volume
: 17
| Issue : 8 | Page : 441-444 |
|
Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Yanbu cohort of the A 1 chieve study
Moody El Harby1, Ahmed Saeed2
1 Department of Diabetic Centre, King Fahd Hospital, Madina, Saudi Arabia
2 Department: Internal Medicine, El Amal Polyclinic, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia
| Date of Web Publication | 27-Nov-2013 |
Correspondence Address:
Moody El Harby
King Fahd Hospital, Madina
Saudi Arabia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.122065
 Abstract | | |
Background: The A 1 chieve, a multicentric (28 countries), 24-week, non-interventional study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care across four continents. Materials and Methods: Data was collected at baseline, at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks. This short communication presents the results for patients enrolled from Yanbu, Saudi Arabia. Results: A total of 499 patients were enrolled in the study. Four different insulin analogue regimens were used in the study. Study patients had started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart (n = 256), insulin detemir (n = 146), insulin aspart (n = 3), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 55) and other insulin combinations (n = 37). At baseline glycaemic control was poor for both insulin naïve (mean HbA 1 c: 9.4%) and insulin user (mean HbA 1 c: 9.5%) groups. After 24 weeks of treatment, both the study groups showed improvement in HbA 1 c (insulin naïve: −2.1%, insulin users: −1.8%). SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events did not occur in the study patients. Conclusion: Starting or switching to insulin analogues was associated with improvement in glycaemic control with a low rate of hypoglycaemia. Keywords: A 1 chieve study, insulin analogues, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Saudi Arabia, Yanbu
How to cite this article:
El Harby M, Saeed A. Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Yanbu cohort of the A 1 chieve study. Indian J Endocr Metab 2013;17, Suppl S2:441-4 |
How to cite this URL:
El Harby M, Saeed A. Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Yanbu cohort of the A 1 chieve study. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 May 8];17, Suppl S2:441-4. Available from: https://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2013/17/8/441/122065 |
| Introduction | |  |
Diabetes prevalence in Saudi Arabia is estimated to be 16.2%, affecting 2.7 million people. [1] Fear of hypoglycaemia and gain in body weight are barriers for initiation of insulin therapy. [2] Modern insulin analogues are a convenient new approach or tool to glycaemic control, associated with low number of hypoglycaemia and favourable weight change. [3] A 1 chieve, a multinational, 24-week, non-interventional study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of insulin analogues in people with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care. [4] This short communication presents the results for patients enrolled from Yanbu, Saudi Arabia.
| Materials and Methods | | |
Please refer to editorial titled: The A 1 chieve study: Mapping the Ibn Battuta trail.
| Results | | |
A total of 499 patients were enrolled in the study. The patient characteristics for the entire cohort divided as insulin-naïve and insulin users is shown in the [Table 1]. Glycaemic control at baseline was poor in this population. The majority of patients (51.3%) started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart. Other groups were insulin detemir (n = 146), insulin aspart (n = 3), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 55) and other insulin combinations (n = 37).
After 24 weeks of treatment, overall hypoglycaemia reduced from 16.3 to 7.2 events/patient-year in insulin user group whereas hypoglycaemic events increased from 0.9 to 2.0 events/patient-year in the insulin naïve group. However, this hypoglycaemia incidence in insulin naive group at 24 weeks was still lower than that observed in insulin users at baseline. SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events did not occur in the study patients. Body weight and blood pressure decreased from baseline, while overall lipid profile improved at week 24 in complete cohort [Table 2] and [Table 3].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in the total cohort [Table 4].
Biphasic insulin aspart ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 256 patients started on biphasic insulin aspart ± OGLD, 153 (59.7%) were insulin naïve and 103 (40.3%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks of treatment, hypoglycaemic events or episodes increased for both the groups (insulin naïve: from 0.3 to 2.3 events/patient-year; insulin users: from 6.9 to 7.1 events/patient-year). Body weight decreased in both insulin naïve and user groups after 24 weeks [Table 5] and [Table 6].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart for both insulin naïve and insulin user groups [Table 7]. | Table 7: Biphasic insulin aspart±oral glucose-lowering drug efficacy data
Click here to view |
Basal + insulin aspart ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 55 patients started on basal + insulin aspart ± OGLD, of which 17 (30.9%) were insulin naïve and 38 (69.1%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks, hypoglycaemic events reduced from 42.1 to 5.5 events/patient-year in insulin user group whereas hypoglycaemia increased from 0.0 to 2.4 events/patient-year in insulin naive group [Table 8] and [Table 9].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were basal + insulin aspart ± OGLDs for both insulin naïve and insulin user groups [Table 10].
Insulin detemir ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 146 patients started on insulin detemir ± OGLD, of which 133 (91.1%) were insulin naïve and 13 (8.9%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks of starting or switching to insulin detemir, hypoglycaemic events reduced from 4.0 to 0.0 events/patient-year in insulin users whereas no change in hypoglycaemia was noted in insulin naïve group compared to baseline. Body weight also decreased at the end of the study [Table 11] and [Table 12].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched to insulin detemir ± OGLDs for both insulin-naïve and insulin user groups [Table 13].
Insulin aspart ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 3 patients started on insulin aspart ± OGLD and all of them were insulin users. After 24 weeks of treatment, hypoglycaemic events reduced from 30.3 to 0.0 events/patient-year. All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched insulin aspart ± OGLDs.
| Conclusion | | |
Our study reports improved glycaemic control following 24 weeks of treatment with any of the insulin analogues (biphasic insulin aspart; basal + insulin aspart; insulin detemir; insulin aspart) with or without OGLD. Their administration even caused a small weight reduction. SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events did not occur in the study patients. Though the findings are limited by number of patients, still the trend indicates that insulin analogues can be considered effective and possess a safe profile for treating type 2 diabetes in Yanbu, Saudi Arabia.
| References | | |
| 1. | IDF Diabetes Atlas. 5 th ed. Available from: http://www.idf.org/atlasmap/atlasmap [Last accessed on 2013 Jun 10]. 
|
| 2. | Korytkowski M. When oral agents fail: Practical barriers to starting insulin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26 Suppl 3:S18-24.
|
| 3. | Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med 2005;352:174-83.
|
| 4. | Shah SN, Litwak L, Haddad J, Chakkarwar PN, Hajjaji I. The A1chieve study: A 60 000-person, global, prospective, observational study of basal, meal-time, and biphasic insulin analogs in daily clinical practice. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;88 Suppl 1:S11-6.
|
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9], [Table 10], [Table 11], [Table 12], [Table 13]
|
