|
| |
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2013 | Volume
: 17
| Issue : 8 | Page : 574-578 |
|
Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Chennai cohort of the A 1 chieve study
JS Kumar1, A Paneerselvam2
1 Department of Medicine, SRM Medical College Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Medicine, Aruna Diabetes Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| Date of Web Publication | 27-Nov-2013 |
Correspondence Address:
J S Kumar
SRM Medical College Research Institute, Chennai
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.122141
 Abstract | | |
Background: The A 1 chieve, a multicentric (28 countries), 24-week, non-interventional study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care across four continents. Materials and Methods: Data was collected at baseline, at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks. This short communication presents the results for patients enrolled from Chennai, India. Results: A total of 1334 patients were enrolled in the study. Four different insulin analogue regimens were used in the study. Patients had started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart (n = 983), insulin detemir (n = 205), insulin aspart (n = 42), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 41) and other insulin combinations (n = 63). At baseline glycaemic control was poor for both insulin naïve (mean HbA 1 c: 9.4%) and insulin users (mean HbA 1 c: 9.3%) groups. After 24 weeks of treatment, both groups showed improvement in HbA 1 c (insulin naïve: −2.1%, insulin users: −1.9%). SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events or episodes did not occur in any of the study patients. Conclusion: Starting or switching to insulin analogues was associated with improvement in glycaemic control with a low rate of hypoglycaemia. Keywords: A 1 chieve study, Chennai, insulin analogues, type 2 diabetes mellitus
How to cite this article:
Kumar J S, Paneerselvam A. Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Chennai cohort of the A 1 chieve study. Indian J Endocr Metab 2013;17, Suppl S2:574-8 |
How to cite this URL:
Kumar J S, Paneerselvam A. Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Chennai cohort of the A 1 chieve study. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Jun 24];17, Suppl S2:574-8. Available from: https://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2013/17/8/574/122141 |
| Introduction | |  |
62.4 million Indians were reported to have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) putting India on the forefront of diabetic epidemic across globe. [1],[2] Fear of hypoglycaemia and gain in body weight are barriers for initiation of insulin therapy. [3] Modern insulin analogues are a convenient new approach or tool to glycaemic control, associated with low number of hypoglycaemia and favourable weight change. [4] A 1 chieve, a multinational, 24-week, non-interventional study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of insulin analogues in people with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care. [5] This short communication presents the results for patients enrolled from Chennai, India.
| Materials and Methods | | |
Please refer to editorial titled: The A 1 chieve study: Mapping the Ibn Battuta trail.
| Results | | |
A total of 1334 patients were enrolled in the study. The patient characteristics for the entire cohort divided as insulin-naïve and insulin users is shown in [Table 1]. Glycaemic control at baseline was poor in this population. The majority of patients (73.7%) started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart. Other groups were insulin detemir (n = 205), insulin aspart (n = 42), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 41) and other insulin combinations (n = 63).
After 24 weeks of treatment, overall hypoglycaemic events reduced in both insulin naïve (from 1.2 events/patient-year to 0.9 events/patient-year) and insulin user (from 2.9 events/patient-year to 2.5 events/patient-year groups. The hypoglycaemia incidence in insulin naive group at 24 weeks was lower than that observed in insulin users at baseline. SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events or episodes did not occur in any of the study patients. Blood pressure decreased from baseline, while overall lipid profile and quality of life improved at week 24 in the total cohort [Table 2] and [Table 3].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in the total cohort [Table 4]. Approximately 30.0% of patients achieved HbA 1 c < 7.0% at week 24.
Biphasic insulin aspart ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 983 patients started on biphasic insulin aspart ± OGLD, of which 683 (69.5%) were insulin naïve and 300 (30.5%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks of starting or switching to biphasic insulin aspart, hypoglycaemic events reduced in both insulin naïve (from 0.9 events/patient-year to 0.8 events/patient-year) and insulin user (from 2.6 events/patient-year to 2.2 events/patient-year) groups. Quality of life also improved by the end of the study [Table 5] and [Table 6].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart for both insulin naïve and insulin user groups [Table 7]. | Table 7: Biphasic insulin aspart±oral glucose-lowering
drug effi cacy data
Click here to view |
Basal + insulin aspart ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 41 patients started on basal + insulin aspart ± OGLD, of which 10 (24.4%) were insulin naïve and 31 (75.6%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks of treatment, hypoglycaemic events reduced from 2.9 events/patient-year to 2.4 events/patient-year in insulin user group whereas hypoglycaemia increased from 2.6 events/patient-year to 3.3 events/patient-year in insulin naïve group. Body weight decreased and quality of life improved after 24 weeks of treatment [Table 8] and [Table 9].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched to basal + insulin aspart ± OGLDs for both insulin naïve and insulin user groups [Table 10].
Insulin detemir ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 205 patients started on insulin detemir ± OGLD, of which 167 (81.5%) were insulin naïve and 38 (18.5%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks of treatment, hypoglycaemic events reduced from 2.6 events/patient-year to 1.0 events/patient-year in insulin naive group whereas hypoglycaemia increased from 1.7 events/patient-year to 2.5 events/patient-year in insulin users. Quality of life improved after 24 weeks of treatment [Table 11] and [Table 12].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched to insulin detemir ± OGLDs for both insulin-naïve and insulin user groups [Table 13].
Insulin aspart ± OGLD
Of the total cohort, 42 patients started on insulin aspart ± OGLD, of which 29 (69.0%) were insulin naïve and 13 (31.0%) were insulin users. After 24 weeks of treatment, hypoglycaemic events reduced from 19.0 events/patient-year to 6.5 events/patient-year in insulin user group whereas hypoglycaemia increased from 0.0 events/patient-year to 0.5 events/patient-year in insulin naïve group. Body weight decreased and quality of life improved after 24 weeks of treatment [Table 14] and [Table 15].
All parameters of glycaemic control improved from baseline to study end in those who started on or were switched to insulin aspart ± OGLDs for both insulin naïve and insulin user groups [Table 16].
| Conclusion | | |
Our study reports improved glycaemic control and quality of life following 24 weeks of treatment with any of the insulin analogues (biphasic insulin aspart; basal + insulin aspart; insulin detemir; insulin aspart) with or without OGLD. SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events or episodes did not occur in any of the study patients. A slight increase in body weight was noted for overall cohort. Though the findings are limited by number of patients, still the trend indicates that insulin analogues can be considered effective and possess a safe profile for treating type 2 diabetes in Chennai, India.
| References | | |
| 1. | Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1047-53. 
|
| 2. | Shetty P. Public health: India's diabetes time bomb. Nature 2012;485:S14-6.
|
| 3. | Korytkowski M. When oral agents fail: Practical barriers to starting insulin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26 Suppl 3:S18-24.
|
| 4. | Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med 2005;352:174-83.
|
| 5. | Shah SN, Litwak L, Haddad J, Chakkarwar PN, Hajjaji I. The A 1 chieve study: A 60 000-person, global, prospective, observational study of basal, meal-time, and biphasic insulin analogs in daily clinical practice. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;88 Suppl 1:S11-6.
|
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9], [Table 10], [Table 11], [Table 12], [Table 13], [Table 14], [Table 15], [Table 16]
|
