Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
Search Article 
Advanced search 
  Users Online: 10 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

Table of Contents
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 301-305

An observational study of the quality of life among gender incongruent individuals from “Hijra” Community of India

1 Department of Endocrinology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Research Assistant, Diabetes-Obesity-Thyroid and Hormone Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 SJJT University, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission01-Apr-2020
Date of Decision04-May-2020
Date of Acceptance03-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication27-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
Anirban Majumder
26A, Gariahat Road South, Kolkata, West Bengal - 700 031
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_169_20

Rights and Permissions

Background: The term “hijra” is used to describe eunuchs, intersex, and gender incongruent individuals from hijra community people in the Indian subcontinent. Various adversities, violence, and discrimination experienced by many of them might have adverse consequences on their quality of life (QOL). The present study was conducted to assess the QOL among adult gender incongruent individuals from the hijra community. Methods: Data of thirty-seven hijra enrolled in the Endocrine outpatient clinic (hijra group) and thirty-seven healthy employees of the hospital (control group) were analyzed with regard to QOL. QOL was assessed by using the physical and mental health Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire. Results on continuous measurements were presented as mean ± SD and results on categorical measurements were presented in number and percent. Mann–Whitney U test or Student t-test was used to find the significance of study parameters between the two groups according to the data distribution. Results: In the domain namely role limitation due to emotional problem, the hijra cohort had a statistically significantly lower score (66.4 ± 20.2) versus the control cohort (83.4 ± 23.7), P = 0.002. No difference was observed between two groups with regards to other QOL domains namely general health perception, physical functioning, role limitation due to physical problem, bodily pain, general mental health, social functioning, and vitality. Conclusions: QOL of the gender incongruent individuals from the hijra community included in this study and the control group comprising of hospital employees were almost similar, though the former had reported lower levels of emotional health issues than the latter.

Keywords: Hijra, transgender persons, quality of life, SF-36 questionnaire

How to cite this article:
Majumder A, Roychaudhuri S, Chakraborty S, Bhattacherjee K. An observational study of the quality of life among gender incongruent individuals from “Hijra” Community of India. Indian J Endocr Metab 2020;24:301-5

How to cite this URL:
Majumder A, Roychaudhuri S, Chakraborty S, Bhattacherjee K. An observational study of the quality of life among gender incongruent individuals from “Hijra” Community of India. Indian J Endocr Metab [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 26];24:301-5. Available from: https://www.ijem.in/text.asp?2020/24/4/301/293597


Cisgender: Denoting to a person whose sense of personal gender identity corresponds with their assigned birth sex.

Gender identity: Internal sense of being male or female or identifying with both or neither.

Intersex or DSD (disorder of sexual differentiation): Denoting to a person born with reproductive or sexual anatomy that does not fit typical definitions of female or male.

Transfeminine: Denoting to a transgender person who were assigned male at birth, but identify with femininity to a greater extent than with masculinity.

Transmasculine: Denoting to a transgender person who were assigned female at birth, but identify with masculinity to a greater extent than with femininity.

Transgender: Denoting to a person whose sense of personal gender identity does not correspond with the assigned birth sex.

   Introduction Top

Gender incongruence (the incongruence between assigned gender and expressed or experienced gender) is associated with social stigma in our country.[1] It may be observed amongst apparently normal individuals, amongst individuals suffering from a disorder of sexual differentiation (DSD), and also amongst some individuals known as “hijra". Most of the hijra are gender incongruent individuals. Hijra has great traditional significance in India. As per the last census in 2011, there are about 5 lakh transgender individuals in India, which is most likely an underestimation. Despite their long-standing presence, the social circumstances faced by them to date, are quite deplorable and they live as a disadvantaged minority.[2] They are found living along the fringes of society and the term “hijra” by which they are labeled, is considered derogatory in the societal perspective.[3] A traditional and ritual adoption process is the gateway into the community. The societal acceptance as well as an outlook towards the hijra have been very different in India and is in stark contrast to that seen in the western world. They face discrimination in education, health, housing, employment, and bureaucratic dealings.[4],[5] As they face discrimination in employment, they generate income from petty extortion, performing at ceremonies, begging, or working as sex-workers.[6] In general, most Indians consider hijra to be sex workers and they face discrimination and are subject to physical, verbal, and sexual abuse since their teenage years.[7] Among the numerous issues faced by transgender people, harassment, perceived discrimination, verbal and physical abuse, and perceived healthcare discrimination still remain important challenges in the western world also.[8] Many of them experience abuse since childhood and also through the rest of their life.[7] Accordingly, these might have adverse consequences on their quality of life (QOL). The QOL among the hijra community of India is understudied and in this context the present study was conducted to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing self-rated health and overall quality of life among gender incongruent individuals from the hijra community of India. The term “hijra” is used as both plural and singular in this article.

   Subjects and Methods Top

Study participants

This was a retrospective case-control study and the case group (hijra cohort) comprised participants from the hijra community who were enrolled in the Endocrine outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital at Kolkata as gender incongruent individuals seeking gender reaffirmation as female. The diagnosis of gender incongruence was reconfirmed using The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V-TR) criteria. From June 2018 to December 2019, gender incongruent patients coming from the hijra community were automatically enrolled in the study. Individuals were excluded from the study if they had an inability to respond to, or an unwillingness to participate in the study or were suffering from severe psychiatric disorders or any limiting chronic disease or DSD. Thirty-seven gender incongruent individuals from the hijra community (hijra cohort) were compared to a control group (control cohort) of 37 apparently healthy volunteer employees of the hospital.

Data collection

After obtaining written informed consent from all the voluntary participants, a detailed history regarding the socio-demographic data was routinely recorded using a semi-structured format. The following variables were acquired by an interview and a self-administered questionnaire regarding age, gender, educational level, and relationship status. All 74 individuals (37 cases and 37 controls) were interviewed face to face in the local language (Bengali) by a trained person using a health survey questionnaire. The data was processed and analyzed by an authorized person and was anonymized and deidentified before analysis.

Main outcome measures

To measure QOL of the case group and the control group, we used the validated version of the self-reported physical and mental health Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire.[9] This questionnaire has 36 independent questions and cover eight domains: general health perceptions (determines the overall sense of well-being), physical functions (evaluates the presence and severity of limitations to physical activities), role limitations due to physical health problems (assesses the limitations to work or other daily activities), role limitations due to emotional problems (assesses the impact of emotional problems in performing daily activities), pain (determines the impact of pain in daily activities), general mental health (evaluates the presence or severity of mental health indicators: like anxiety and depression), social functioning (measures the impact of health in engaging in social activities), and vitality (evaluates the influence of health on energy level and fatigue).

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out with Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.2 for Windows, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA) and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Complex Samples, Version 21.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Microsoft Word and Excel were used to generate graphs and tables. Results on continuous measurements were presented as mean ± SD and results on categorical measurements were presented in number percent (%). Significance was assessed at a level of 5%.

The following assumptions were made of the data:

  1. Cases of the samples were independent.
  2. The populations from which the samples were drawn had the same variance (or standard deviation) and
  3. The samples drawn from different populations were random.

The normality of data was tested by the Anderson Darling test, Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test, and visually by QQ plot. Mann–Whitney U test or Student t-test was used to find the significance of study parameters between the two groups (hijra and control group) according to the data distribution.

   Results Top

A total of 37 gender incongruent individuals from hijra community (hijra cohort) and 37 apparently healthy employees (control cohort) of the hospital were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the control group was 25.25 years and that of the hijra group was 26.77 years. Age, gender, educational level (post-graduate/professional, graduate, high-school, secondary-school, class eight standards, literate or illiterate), and relationship status (married, unmarried-single or unmarried in relationship) of both the group are shown in [Table 1]. Out of the 37 control cohort, 40.54% were straight heterosexual male and 59.45% were straight heterosexual female. The study population of the hijra cohort was gender incongruent individuals from hijra community. The education level of control group was much better compared to hijra group. The study population of the hijra cohort was either unmarried or unmarried in relation.
Table 1: Demography, Education,and Relationship status for Control Cohort and Hijra Cohort

Click here to view

Perceived QOL characteristics of the 37 gender incongruent individuals from hijra community and 37 controls are shown in [Table 2]. Both hijra cohort and control cohort, rated their QOL equal in the dimensions of general health perceptions, physical function, role limitations due to physical health problems, pain, general mental health, social functioning, and vitality. The domain of role limitation due to emotional problems deals with the aspects of emotional health issues interfering with routine activities as experienced by both the groups. Hijra cohort rated their emotional health problems less than the control group (P value 0.003).
Table 2: Crude means and standard deviations for the SF-36 domains for control cohort and hijra cohort

Click here to view

   Discussion Top

Transgender people face considerable challenges in their life. Challenges can be physiological (development of secondary sexual characteristics), social (rejection, discrimination, victimization, transphobia), and psychological (anxiety, depression, low self-esteem). These challenges have a profound negative impact on QOL. A systematic review and meta-analysis, looking at the different dimensions of QOL, suggest that treatment-seeking gender incongruent people display poorer QOL than the general population, independent of the QOL domain investigated.[9] QOL is a complex concept and can be described in different ways and can be considered as a way of quantifying the level of functioning and perceived wellbeing of people's lives.[10] The QOL should be assessed based on different physical and psychosocial domains. SF-36 health survey questionnaire[11] (a shortened version of a battery of 149 health status questions) as a measure of patient outcome, seems acceptable to the patients, internally consistent, and a valid measure of the health status.[12] The SF36 health survey questionnaire is often used to measure the QOL of transgender people,[13],[14] and this questionnaire is used in this study also.

Most of the studies showed that the QOL of transgenders is lower in the physical function subscale.[15],[16] A systematic meta-analysis of the studies on QOL in transgender people, found poorer QOL than the general population, particularly before the gender-affirming treatments.[9] However, there is a significant difference between transmasculine and transfeminine individuals in mental health outcomes.[16] Keeping in the background the cultural preference and the desire to have male children by most of the parents of India, males who seek to change gender have poor family and community acceptance. Not only mental health but all dimensions of the QOL get affected because of this lack in family and social support. Most of the studies carried out in different parts of the world show a similar trend and lower QOL in MTF (male to female) compared to FTM (female to male) transgender.[16],[17],[18]

We have a cohort of gender incongruent individuals seeking gender reaffirmation as female (hijra cohort) in this study, and they are at different stages of the treatment protocol in our institute. The gender incongruent individuals from hijra community of our study cohort reported similar QOL in most of the dimensions (general health perceptions, physical functions, role limitations due to physical health problems, pain, general mental health, social functioning, and vitality) compared to the control group ([Table 2]- P values were not significant). Unexpectedly, the hijra group reported less emotional health problems (P-value 0.002). These people, usually were shunned by their families in their early adulthood, and they left their homes and moved to a new location to live with the hijra community, as members of a rundown section of the society. They were given new names and new identities in the community. A sense of isolation drove them towards the hijra community, as an association of like-minded souls. They forgot their past and accustomed themselves to the course of hijra life and emerged with a new name and a new gender role. Hijra have a recorded history in the Indian subcontinent from antiquity onwards and have served as a traditional support group since then, in sharp contrast to the professional modern support group system of western countries formed in the last few decades only.

Gender affirming treatments (long-term hormone therapy, upper and lower sex reassignment surgical interventions) in transgenders are associated with improvement in QOL and improvement in a sense of general health.[9],[14],[17] However, all hijra in the study population were in the nascent stages of the gender-affirming process. Age, better educational status, better socio-economic status, obtaining jobs, presence of family, and community support have a positive correlation to the overall state of the physical and mental health in the transgenders. Nevertheless, family and social support are a very important aspect affecting the transgender QOL.[19],[20],[21]

The human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people (LGBT) are coming into sharper focus around the world, with advances in the adoption of new legal protections. In April 2014, the Supreme Court of India (NALSA judgment) granted legal recognition of the third gender and upheld the fundamental rights (the right of equality and equal protection) of the LGBT community as is guaranteed in Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution.[22] Since the judgment laid the framework for better protection from discrimination based on gender identity, the Government's approach on LGBT has evolved considerably. Now, the Government has directed to provide medical care to transgender people in the hospitals, planned to include the community in various social welfare schemes, promoted the creation of jobs in Indian companies, and are taking steps to create public awareness about the LGBT community, so that these people from weaker sections of the society, feel that they are also a part and parcel of normal societal structure. All these measures have a positive impact on the Hijra community and are possibly reflected in QOL assessment process.


Although this study reveals several results that served towards the goal of a better understanding of the hijra community of India, it has some limitations also. The study is a case-control model and is limited in its ability to elucidate causal relationships. The study exclusively included gender incongruent individuals from the hijra community who were seeking medical help for their gender incongruence and hence did not include the hijra who could not access medical interventions but form a large majority within the class. Socio-economic status, which can be scored on the basis of occupation, education, and income (Kuppuswamy scale) has a significant effect on QOL. As these confounding factors weree not considered for QOL assessment, it remains a major limitation of this study. The relatively small sample size in this study is also a potential limitation. A large sample should, therefore, be analyzed before reaching the conclusion. The control group in this study was recruited from volunteers among the employees of our hospital and not from the community. In particular, the control group was not matched in socio-demographic characteristics, although we tried to match in age. Hence, our data cannot be generalized to the large hijra community of India.

   Conclusion Top

QOL of gender incongruent individuals from the hijra community are similar to the present control group in all dimensions but is better with regards to emotional health issues. This can be partially to the recent legislation passed and social upliftment measures adopted by the Indian Government in favor of the hijra community.


We express our gratitude to all of the participants who consented to participate.

Abbreviations: ANOVA: Analysis of variance; FTM: Female to male; IQR: interquartile range; MTF: Male to female; QOL: Quality of life; SF-36: Short form 36

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Kalra S. The eunuchs of India: An endocrine eye opener. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012;16:377-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
Somasundaram O. Transgenderism: Facts and fictions. Indian J Psychiatry 2009; 51:73-5.   Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Nanda S. The hijras of India: Cultural and individual dimensions of an institutionalized third gender role. J Homosex 1985;11:35-54.  Back to cited text no. 3
Bradford J, Reisner SL, Honnold JA, Xavier J. Experiences of transgender-related discrimination and implications for health: Results from the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study. Am J Public Health 2013;103:1820-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
Kosenko K, Rintamaki L, Raney S, Maness K. Transgender patient perceptions of stigma in health care contexts. Med Care 2013;51:819-22.  Back to cited text no. 5
Abdullah MA, Basharat Z, Kamal B, Sattar NY, Hassan ZF, Jan AD, et al. Is social exclusion pushing the Pakistani Hijras (Transgenders) towards commercial sex work? A qualitative study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2012;12:32.  Back to cited text no. 6
Friedman MS, Marshal MP, Guadamuz TE, Wei C, Wong CF, Saewyc E, et al. A meta-analysis of disparities in childhood sexual abuse, parental physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority individuals. Am J Public Health 2011;101:1481-94.  Back to cited text no. 7
Reback CJ, Clark K, Holloway IW, Fletcher JB. Health disparities, risk behaviors and healthcare utilization among transgender women in Los Angeles county: A comparison from 1998-1999 to 2015-2016. AIDS Behav 2018;22:2524-33.  Back to cited text no. 8
Nobili A, Glazebrook C, Arcelus J. Quality of life of treatment-seeking transgender adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2018;19:199-220.  Back to cited text no. 9
Newfield E, Hart S, Dibble S, Kohler L. Female-to-male transgender quality of life. Qual Life Res 2006;15:1447-57.  Back to cited text no. 10
Available from: http://www.sf-36.org/. [Last accessed on 2017 Dec 19]  Back to cited text no. 11
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: An outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993;306:1440-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
Valashany BT, Janghorbani M. Quality of life of men and women with gender identity disorder. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018;16:167.  Back to cited text no. 13
Gorin-Lazard A, Baumstarck K, Boyer L, Maquigneau A, Gebleux S, Penochet JC, et al. Is hormonal therapy associated with better quality of life in transsexuals? A cross-sectional study. J Sex Med 2012;9:531-41.  Back to cited text no. 14
Reisner SL, Vetters R, Leclerc M, Zaslow S, Wolfrum S, Shumer D, et al. Mental health of transgender youth in care at an adolescent urban community health center: A matched retrospective cohort study. J Adolesc Health 2015;56:274-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
Motmans J, Meier P, Ponnet K, T'Sjoen G. Female and male transgender quality of life: Socioeconomic and medical differences. J Sex Med 2012;9:743-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
Ainsworth TA, Spiegel JH. Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery. Qual Life Res 2010;19:1019-24.  Back to cited text no. 17
Gómez-Gil E, Zubiaurre-Elorza L, de Antonio IE, Guillamon A, Salamero M. Determinants of quality of life in Spanish transsexuals attending a gender unit before genital sex reassignment surgery. Qual Life Res 2014;23:669-76.  Back to cited text no. 18
Simons L, Schrager SM, Clark LF, Belzer M, Olson J. Parental support and mental health among transgender adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2013;53:791-3.  Back to cited text no. 19
Davey A, Bouman WP, Arcelus J, Meyer C. Social support and psychological well-being in gender dysphoria: A comparison of patients with matched controls. J Sex Med 2014;11:2976-85.  Back to cited text no. 20
Başar K, Öz G, Karakaya J. Perceived discrimination, social support, and quality of life in gender dysphoria. J Sex Med 2016;13:1133-41.  Back to cited text no. 21
Sayan Bhattacharya. The Transgender Nation and its Margins: The Many Lives of the Law. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal. 2019; 20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4930. [Last accessed on 2020 Feb 10].  Back to cited text no. 22


  [Table 1], [Table 2]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Article Tables
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded248    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal